DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee Judy Winn, UW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee Judy Winn, UW

Description:

Title: DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee Judy Winn, UW Milwaukee Mary Spidell, Milwaukee Public Schools Chris Guthrie, Elmbrook Schools WMC Green Lake Conference May 7 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: www4UwmE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee Judy Winn, UW


1
DeAnn Huinker, UW-MilwaukeeJudy Winn, UW
MilwaukeeMary Spidell, Milwaukee Public
SchoolsChris Guthrie, Elmbrook Schools WMC
Green Lake ConferenceMay 7, 2010
  • Collaborative Practices of General Special
    Education Teachers
  • Making a Difference in Students Mathematics
    Learning

2
Presentation Objective WALT
  • Objective
  • Develop a stronger alliance between special
    education teachers and general education
    teachers.
  • Investigate strategies that are showing promise
    in reaching the needs of students struggling to
    learn math.
  • WALT (We Are Learning To)
  • Collaborate with special education and general
    education teachers to plan and implement
    effective mathematics instruction.

3
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special
Education Learners
  • Vision
  • Improve mathematics performance for students in
    grades 4-8, particularly for students with
    special needs and for students who struggle, and
  • Support a school culture for collaboration of
    general and special education teachers on
    improving math for all students

4
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special
Education Learners
  • Goals
  • To strengthen the mathematics content knowledge
    of general and special education teachers
  • To enhance mathematics instructional and
    assessment practices, focusing on appropriate
    accommodations and modifications for special
    education students
  • To increase collaboration on math instruction
    between general and special education teachers.

5
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special
Education Learners
6
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special
Education Learners
  • 3-year project funded by WI DPI, Mathematics and
    Science Partnership Program, ESEA Title II Part B
  •  17 credits over the 3 years
  • 35 participants
  • 17 special education teachers
  • 12 teachers of math
  • 2 special education diagnostic teachers
  • 4 math teacher leaders
  • 6 instructors
  • Meet on Tuesday evenings during the school year
    and summers

7
Vocabulary Activity
  • Everyone will have a vocabulary card taped to
    his/her back.
  • Move around the room asking each person a yes or
    no question to try to figure out the vocabulary
    word or phrase on your back.
  • You may not ask the same person two questions in
    a row. 
  • You have 10 minutes to try to figure out your
    word or phrase.
  • When you think you know your word, find others
    who have the same word and form a group.

8
Vocabulary Activity
  • Inclusion
  • Resource
  • Support
  • Parallel
  • Accessibility
  • Barriers
  • Plans
  • Station

9
Three arrangements for math instruction for
students with disabilities
  • Inclusion without special education support
  • Resource/pull-out without regular education
    support
  • Co-teaching
  • There is not one best way to collaborate what is
    important is that there is collaboration.

10
6 Models of Co-teaching
  • One teach, One support
  • One teach, One observe
  • Station Teaching
  • Parallel Teaching
  • Alternative Teaching
  • Team Teaching
  • Source Friend, M.

11
One teach, One support
  • One teacher leads the lesson while one teacher
    moves around the room providing support to
    students as needed.

12
One teach, One observe
  • One teacher leads the lesson while the other
    teacher observes the lesson.
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses

13
Station Teaching
  • Teachers work with students at different stations
    that students rotate through.
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses

14
Parallel Teaching
  • Both teachers give the same lesson at the same
    time to different heterogeneous groups.
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses

15
Alternative Teaching
  • One teacher provides instruction to the large
    group while the other teacher works with a
    smaller group of students.
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses

16
Team Teaching
  • Both teachers share the instructional activities
    equally
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses

17
Alliance Participants
  • We collaborate daily on what we need to work on
    the next day by discussing our thoughts on
    student achievement for that days activities
  • Our conversations are mostly around management
    and the attainment of IEP goals at about the time
    the IEP is due. Occasionally we talk about
    content.
  • We talk on a daily basis about concepts being
    taught in classroom. We work on assessments
    together


18
Alliance Participants
  • Talk about strategies we use what has worked,
    what hasnt, what they seem to understand.
  • We meet at least once per month to discuss pacing
    and strategies
  • We are collaborating to teach a small group of
    learners-primarily with cognitive disabilities.
    We just started collaborating but we expect 50/50
    share in teaching

19
Essentials for Co-teaching
  • Voluntary participation
  • Time to plan together
  • Mutual respect
  • Administrative support
  • Flexibility creativity
  • Personal and professional compatibility
  • Shared instructional philosophy

20
Planning StrategiesAddressing Accessibility in
Mathematics
  1. Focus on mathematics
  2. Focus on students
  3. Identify potential barriers
  4. Brainstorm accessibility strategies
  5. Share the strategies
  6. Plan follow-up actions

21
Planning StrategiesAddressing Accessibility in
Mathematics
1. Focus on the mathematics What are the mathematics goals? What are the tasks? What is most important for all students to learn?
2. Focus on students What are your students strengths and weaknesses?
3. Identify potential barriers What is the match or mismatch between the lessons mathematics content and the students strengths and weaknesses?
22
Planning StrategiesAddressing Accessibility in
Mathematics
4. Brainstorm accessibility strategies What strategies would you use to meet students needs and enable them to reach the mathematics goals?
23
Planning StrategiesAddressing Accessibility in
Mathematics
5. Share the Strategies What strategies would you choose for your student? What strategies would you use if you had all these students?
24
The Problem
25
The Activity
  • Solve the problem
  • Identify the Big Math Ideas for the problem
  • Based on your tables student vignette, and using
    the provided planning sheet, identify
  • The students strengths
  • Potential barriers for the students
  • How to make this problem accessible for the
    student
  • Be prepared to share

26
Accessibility Strategies
  • -

Kevin
Read descriptions to him or seat him with strong reader Have him paraphrase descriptions once he hears them Have him highlight important information in the story and then match to graph Provide hints (Adapted from Brodesky et. al, 2004)
27
Accessibility Strategies
Isabelle
-Allow Isabelle movement breaks during the problem. -Ask Isabelle to repeat or rephrase instructions given by the teacher -Have a secret code or signal between teacher and Isabelle to help tune her back in. -When working in a small group, ask Isabelle to be the record keeper to help keep her on task. Have Isabelle review her work and initial each step after she reviews it.
28
Accessibility Strategies

Danny
Use a planning sheet Consider using only three graphs Consider a template for his response - Preview activity with Danny and review turn taking and listening skills (Adapted from Brodesky et. al, 2004)
29
Accessibility Strategies
Sarah
Have Sarah paraphrase what she is to do Have her tell identify places on graphs showing slow growth of the plant Model linking one graph to the story and numbers for her -Have her use graph paper to graph one set of numbers - Give her written hints (Adapted from Brodesky et. al, 2004)
30
Co-Teaching What is the literature telling us?
  • Requires mutual respect, trust, commitment to
    planning and common philosophy
  • Requires administrative support
  • Requires TIME for planning
  • Difficult if teachers did not select models
  • Voluntary participants more favorable than those
    who are assigned
  • Gets better over time
  • (Reviewed in Friend, 2007 Mastroprieri et. Al,
    2005 Stivers, 20)

31
Teachers speak out
  • The special educator I work with says she doesnt
    really know the curriculum and is uncomfortable
    participating in instruction. Im not sure what
    she is supposed to do.
  • The classroom teacher told me that I should not
    talk during instruction. He told me that after
    he finished, I could walk around and help my
    students. I feel like a teaching assistant.
  • We never have a chance to plan, so it is not a
    real partnership.
  • (M. Friend, 2007)

32
Teachers speak out
  • I knew this wasnt going to work after all, I
    dont have special education training. But I
    have to admit, its the best thing we have ever
    done for our kids. I could never go back to the
    old system.
  • I never realized how much potential these
    students have. Theyre making more progress than
    I ever thought possible when I had them in the
    special education classroom.
  • Why didnt we do this years ago?
  • (M. Friend, 2007)

33
Card Activity Wrap-up
  • How could you differentiate this activity?
  • Content
  • Process
  • Product

34
Helpful website with many links to other helpful
websites
  • Addressing Accessibility in Mathematics
    www.edc.org/accessmath
  • This website has excellent planning tools and
    strategies as well as links to many other helpful
    websites.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com