Edwards v. Aguillard Trial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Edwards v. Aguillard Trial

Description:

Edwards v. Aguillard Trial * * Background Creationism and evolution had been fought by various politicians for years. In 1929, the Butler Act was introduced and it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: AbbyM6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Edwards v. Aguillard Trial


1
Edwards v. Aguillard Trial
2
Background
  • Creationism and evolution had been fought by
    various politicians for years. In 1929, the
    Butler Act was introduced and it basically
    outlawed teaching evolution in public schools.

3
Background
  • In the 1960s, evolution was again put into public
    school agendas though many people were not happy
    with it and tried to get it outlawed again. In
    the 1980s, some states decided that they want
    creationism taught while evolution was taught.
    They wanted creationism to be taught and seen as
    another theory.

4
Background
  • One of the states that passed such a law was
    Louisiana. The new legislature was created by
    Sate Senator Bill P. Keith of Caddo Parish. The
    bill was entitled Balanced Treatment for
    Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public
    School Instruction Act. It was otherwise known as
    the Creationism act. The act made it law that
    when evolution was being taught so must creation
    science be taught along with it.

5
Background
  • Don Aguillard was a high school advanced biology
    teacher in Louisiana. He took notice of the new
    creation science law. He believed it threatened
    academic freedom, because it imposed religious
    implications in science. He believed that
    allowing this was unconstitutional in violation
    of the establishment clause.

6
Trial
  • Don Aguillard challenged the law by suing Edwin
    W. Edwards, who was the governor of Louisiana at
    the time. The cause when to the Supreme court in
    December 10, 1986.

7
Trial
  • The Supreme court heard Aguillards argument of
    the act being in violation of the first amendment
    and threatening of academic freedom. The judges
    put these accusations to the test by using the
    lemon test.

8
Lemon Test
  • The lemon test was created after the case of
    Lemon v. Kurtzman in 1971, which was a case about
    reinbursement of nonpublic school teacher
    salaries. The lemon test was a test made based on
    this case for future cases that had to do with
    the violation of the first ammendment having to
    do with Religion.

9
Lemon Test
  • The three part Lemon test is as follows
  • 1. The government's action must have a secular
    legislative purpose
  • The government's action must not have the primary
    effect of either advancing or inhibiting
    religion
  • The government's action must not result in an
    "excessive government entanglement" with religion.

10
Lemon Test
  • If any of these parts of the test are violated,
    the ruling is that it is unconstitutional. and in
    violation of the establishment clause.

11
Decision
  • In Edwards v. Aguillard, the Supreme court used
    the Lemon test. In June 19, 1987, the act failed
    the Lemon test, because it did not pass all three
    parts of the test. The court ruled that teachers
    were limited by only able to teach evolution if
    they also taught creation science. They could not
    determine, which scientific principles to be
    taught.

12
Dissenting Opinion
  • The ruling was that the act was made to impose
    religious purpose in public schools. Justice
    Antoin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist
    dissented. They argued that the acts purpose of
    protecting academic freedom was a secular purpose
    and valid.

13
Aftermath
  • The ruling only affected public schools to
    refrain from teaching creation science. Nonpublic
    schools could continue to teach such sciences. A
    few years later, intelligent design theory was
    created where creation science was just changed
    to intelligent design or designer for the text
    book of Of Pandas and People. Intelligent design
    in the 1990s became a new movement of thought and
    theory in the minds of religious and nonreligious
    alike. Of Pandas and People textbook also became
    public in the trial of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area
    School District.

14
Quiz
  • What was the other name for the Balanced
    Treatment for Creation-Science and
    Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction
    Act?
  • The Evolution Act
  • The Butler Act
  • The Intelligent Design Act
  • The Creation Act -

15
Quiz
  • 2. Where was this act passed?
  • Arkansas
  • Tennessee
  • Louisiana-
  • Kentucky

16
Quiz
  • 3. Who was Aguillard?
  • A state representative
  • A scientist
  • A parent of a student
  • A teacher-

17
Quiz
  • 4. What did the plantiff state that the act was
    in violation of?
  • The Establishment Clause
  • Threatened academic freedom
  • The First Amendment
  • All of the Above-
  • None of the Above

18
Quiz
  • 5. What was the name of the test that the Supreme
    Court used to judge this case?
  • The Lee mon test
  • The Lemon test-
  • The Religious test
  • The Evolution test

19
Quiz
  • 6. True or False. The act passed the Lemon test.
  • True
  • False-

20
Quiz
  • 7. True or False. The act was considered
    unconstitutional.
  • True-
  • False

21
Quiz
  • 8. The Supreme Court ruling affected all of the
    following except
  • Public Schools
  • Public School Teachers
  • Independent Schools-
  • Public School Students

22
Quiz
  • 9. Which Justices had a dissenting opinion?
  • Chief Justice William Rehnquist
  • Thurgood Marshall
  • Sandra Day OConnor
  • Antonin Scalia
  • AB
  • AC
  • AD-

23
Quiz
  • 10. What was creation sciences name changed to
    in the 1990s?
  • Evolution
  • Intelligent Design-
  • Creationsim
  • Creator Science

24
Resources
  • http//www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1
    513
  •  
  • http//www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/US
    SC_CR_0482_0578_ZS.html
  •  
  • http//ncse.com/creationism/legal/edwards-v-aguill
    ard
  •  
  • http//www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/case
    .aspx?id464
  •  
  • http//atheism.about.com/library/decisions/evo/bld
    ec_EdwardsAguillard.htm
  •  
  • http//law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conl
    aw/edwards.html
  •  
  • http//aclu.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceI
    D495
  •  
  • http//www.jstor.org/pss/4450650
  •  
  • http//wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_Edwards_and_Agui
    llard_in_the_US_Supreme_Court_case_Edwards_v._Agui
    llard
  •  
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com