Titel f - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Titel f

Description:

DDGS Whole Stillage Centrifuge Dryer Wet Grains Results/Analysis Discussion/Conclusion Background Schematic diagram of the dry grind process. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: MSp
Category:
Tags: ddgs | titel

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Titel f


1
New Green Process Technology For Energy Efficient
Ethanol Production and Decreased Fermentation
Time Via Enzymatic Water Removal From Distillers
Grains
Bia Henriques, David Johnston and Muthanna
Al-Dahhan
Results/Analysis
Discussion/Conclusion
Background
Schematic diagram of the dry grind process.
Enzyme addition is represented by dashed line
into fermentor.
  • Multifect GC showed highest dewatering capability
  • Suggested dosage of 0.67kg per metric ton dry
    corn
  • Mash with 30 solids loading
  • Observed 16-20/w increase in dewatering
  • GC106 gave highest reduction in fermentation time
  • Suggested Dosage of 0.67kg per metric ton dry
    corn
  • Mash with 30 solids loading
  • Significant reduction in fermentation time
  • Reduction in viscosity of mash with enzymes
  • Potential oil separation with Multifect GC
  • GC220, Multifect GC and GC 106 are commercially
    available, enzyme cocktails

Control No Treatment
  • Dewatering increased with increasing GC220 load
  • Dewatering effect tapers off at around 0.015 mL
    of enzyme/100 mL of mash
  • 95 of maximum dewatering achieved with 0.015 mL
    of enzyme
  • Small increase in dewatering with increasing
    protease load
  • Benefits to drier
  • Emissions reduction
  • Residence time reduction
  • Operating temperature reduction
  • Energy input reduction
  • Benefits to fermentation
  • Fermentation time reduction
  • Productivity increase
  • Benefits to centrifuge
  • Viscosity reduction
  • Evaporator able to handle extra water
  • Possible improvement in water recycle
  • Possible savings of 0.8 to 1.2 million for
    40mmgpy plant
  • Bonds between water molecules and polyssacharides
  • Different bonding types and strengths
  • Maximum water binding capacity
  • One hydrogen bond between water and
    polyssacharide
  • Molecule is highly hydrophilic
  • Duplicate data
  • Differences in dry solid pellet weight were not
    significant for the most part
  • Some material may be solubilizing but the amount
    is too small to be quantified
  • Attempt to disrupt network of hydrogen bonding
  • Free water
  • Cell wall degrading enzymes hydrolyze and cleave
    cellulose and hemicellulose
  • Possible use of enzymes to disrupt bonding
  • Cell wall degrading and proteolytic enzymes
  • Increase
  • Water removal during centrifugation
  • Productivity
  • Decrease
  • Drier temperature, residence time and emissions
  • Fermentation time
  • Decrease in dewatering with increase in protease
    load
  • Specially as MGC load is increased, dewatering
    effect decreases with increasing protease load
  • MGC and GC106 could have inhibiting effect when
    added together to mash
  • Highest dewatering seen when no protease is
    present

Future Work
  • Addition of enzymes to fermentation
  • Maximize activity time
  • Look at commercially available enzyme
    combinations
  • Maintain industrial parameters
  • Temperature
  • pH
  • Residence times
  • Centrifugal force
  • Ferm Gen Experiment
  • Reduce fermentation time
  • Centrifuge Modeling
  • Compare theoretical to experimental data
  • Plant Trial
  • Center Ethanol Sauget, IL
  • Scheduled
  • October 2008
  • Duplicate data
  • Definite downwards trend in the dry solid pellet
    weights
  • Statistically only weights at 0.02 mL of GC220
    and above are different from rest
  • Some solubilization could be occurring but not
    possible to quantify

Methodology
Acknowledgements
Saccharification, Fermentation and Enzymatic
Hydrolysis
Corn Grind
Liquefaction
  • Thank you Genencor and Novozymes for all of the
    enzymes
  • Thank you Dr. Vijay Singh for providing the corn
    from UofI Urbana/Champagne
  • I would like to thank the following people for
    all their support
  • Dr. Muthanna Al-Dahhan (Advisor)
  • Dr. David Johnston (Advisor USDA)
  • Dr. Kevin Hicks (Research Leader USDA)
  • Dr. Andy McAloon (Modeling and Economics USDA)
  • Financial support from
  • USDA
  • WashU-SIUE/NASEO Grant 65356
  • CREL sponsors
  • Graph shows weight loss of fermentation flasks
    over time
  • Enzyme treated mash has significant increase in
    weight loss rate compared to control
  • At 32 hours enzyme treated mash is at 95
    completion whereas control is at 79 completion
  • Fermentation time can be decreased, increasing
    ethanol production

Evaporation
Centrifugation
Analysis
Filtration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com