Awareness during general anesthesia ; concepts and controversies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Awareness during general anesthesia ; concepts and controversies

Description:

Awareness during general anesthesia ; concepts and controversies Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain (2006) 25, 211-218 Stuart A Formal M.D, Ph D – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:384
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: ocsu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Awareness during general anesthesia ; concepts and controversies


1
Awareness during general anesthesia concepts
and controversies
  • Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine
    and Pain (2006) 25, 211-218
  • Stuart A Formal M.D, Ph D
  • ?????
  • ???????
  • R4 ???

2
Introduction
  • In 1845, Horace Wells
  • N2O anesthesia
  • Pt moved and cried out
  • No recall of his operation
  • In 1846, W.T.G. Morton
  • Ether anesthesia
  • Surgeons considered it a success
  • Pt. had been aware, no pain.
  • From a pts perspective, Wells anesthetic may be
    considered more successful than Mortons.

3
Introduction
  • Aims
  • Explain how and why awareness during GA
  • Summarizing research on the multiple actions of
    GA which are mediated by different parts of CNS.
  • Review clinical research on awareness during GA
  • Emphasis on recognizing high-risk pts and
    strategies for preventing this problem.

4
Anesthetic actions and anatomic substrates
  • GA affect a wide variety of neural functions,
    suppressing different neural circuits at
    different concentrations.
  • Most important therapeutic actions of GA
  • Suppression of memory, awareness, and movement.
  • Supression of these three CNS functions occurs at
    different anesthetic concetrations.
  • Each of these anesthetic-sensitive actions is
    controlled by different neural circuits in the
    CNS.

5
Anesthetic actions and anatomic substrates
  • Movement in response to pain
  • Supressed by anesthetic effects that are almost
    entirely within spinal cord
  • Inhibition of awareness and memory
  • due to effects on different brain circuits
  • Different GA act via distinct mechanisms at the
    molecular level.
  • Many intravenous and volatile anesthetics affect
    the CNS
  • Gamma-aminobutyric a. type A(GABAA) Receptor
  • Dominant inhibitory NT-activated ion ch. in the
    brain.
  • N2O and ketamine
  • Inhibit Glutamate and acetylcholine R.

6
Assessment of anesthetic depth how do we know
how much is enough?
  • Surgical anesthesia
  • Suppression of movement in response to surgical
    pain.
  • Movement after an incision is suppressed in half
    of subjects at MAC
  • MAC BAR(MAC- Blockade of Autonomic Reflexes)
  • Deeper planes of GA
  • Suppress autonomic responses to extremely painful
    stimuli
  • MAC-awake
  • Suppress perceptive awareness(Perceive
    non-painful stimuli, interpret them, and respond
    appropriately)
  • About 1/3 of MAC for volatile agents
  • about 2/3 of MAC for N2O

7
Assessment of anesthetic depth how do we know
how much is enough?
  • Ensuring adequate anesthesia
  • Large patient-to patient variability
  • Some factors
  • Old ages require less anesthetic
  • Core temperature influence sensitivity to
    anesthetics
  • Chronic exposure to neuro-depressants
  • Induce resistance to GA
  • Acute exposure to neuro-modulators
  • Can shift anesthetic requirements upward or
    downward.
  • Anxiety and pain
  • Increased surgical pain inc. MAC, MAC-awake
  • Neuroaxial blockade
  • Reducing MAC and dec. BZD and volatile anesthetic
    requirements
  • Pharmacologic interventions

8
Assessment of anesthetic depth how do we know
how much is enough?
  • Introduction and widespread use of m. relaxants
  • Dramatically changed clinical practice and
    created new unexpected problems
  • M. relaxant
  • Immobile pt. and optimal surgical conditions
  • Enabling anesthetists to use lighter anesthesia
    and avoiding the cardiovascualr depression.
  • NMB makes assessment of anesthetic depth much
    more difficult.

9
Assessment of anesthetic depth how do we know
how much is enough?
  • When muscle relaxants are used,
  • Autonomic responses ( HR, BP, pupil size, and
    sweating) are observed. to assess pt responses
    to various stimuli.
  • Modified by pt position, surgical events,
    neuroaxial blockade, and a variety of medications
    that do not affect consciousness.
  • Monitors that use EEG signals to estimate depth
    of anesthesia
  • Accurate assessment of explicit vs implicit
    memory
  • Recall of validated word lists and performance on
    exclusion vs inclusion tests using post-exposure
    word lists.

10
Types of awareness during general anesthesia
events
  • Intraop. awareness
  • Duration
  • Experience of pain and/or anxiety
  • Explicit recall is present.
  • Awake paralysis
  • Aware, experiencing pain and anxiety, and able to
    remember these experiences.
  • Most case
  • Explicit recall are brief, and usually no pain
  • Awareness without explicit recall
  • Vague memories
  • Dreams or dream-like experiences
  • Associated with intraoperative events

11
Types of awareness during general anesthesia
events
  • Awareness can also be classified as preventable
    or not.
  • Most cases have been deemed preventable
  • Drug administration errors
  • Mis-labeled drug syringes
  • Empty vaporizers
  • Leaky gas delivery circuits
  • Dysfunctional or misused drug infusion pumps
  • Intravenous lines that stopping running
  • Diffcult airway cases

12
Incidence of awareness during general anesthesia
  • Estimate the incidence of awareness
  • Multiple post-anesthetic interviews, usually
    using a modified Brice interview
  • Definite awareness
  • Recall conversations or music that they hear in
    the OR during the period of awareness
  • Probable awareness
  • Hearing voices or feeling discomfort asso with
    intubation or surgery
  • Possible cases
  • More vague and dream-like
  • Psychological sx. without explicit recall
  • They have implicit recall of intraop. Events or
    that the trauma or the experience results in
    memory suppression.

13
Incidence of awareness during general anesthesia
  • One large study in Sweden
  • definite awareness 0.06
  • A 2004 study in US academic centers
  • awareness with recall 0.13
  • Uncertainties
  • One possible explanation
  • Awareness experiences reported days after surgery
    may represent pt memories formed in the PACU
    rather than OR.
  • Pt may be reticent to report negative experiences
    such as awareness while still dependent on the
    care of hospital staff.
  • Anesthetist may alter their anethetic technique
    subtly when they know that intraop. Awareness
    will be monitored.
  • Pt may be more prone to give positive responses
    to questions about intraop. Awarenss, simply they
    are asked.

14
Risk factors for awareness during general
anesthesia
  • Anesthetic technique
  • The type of surgery
  • Use of neuromuscular blockade
  • Light anesthesia techniques
  • Cardiac anesthesia without hypnotic agents and
    N2O-narcotic-relaxant
  • Up to 4 awareness
  • Highest risk surgeries
  • Prevent the hemodynamic consuquences of high
    conc. Of volatile or intravenous agents.
  • Cardiac surgery 1-1.5 awareness
  • Trauma surgery 11-43
  • C/S under GA 0.4
  • Ptrelated f.
  • Chronic alcohol, antiepileptic, opiate, or other
    sedative drug use, history of awareness during
    GA., limited cardiovascular reserve, or ASA Class
    ?-?

15
Psychological harm and awareness during general
anesthesia
  • PTSD(post-traumatic stress disorder)
  • Most harmful consequence
  • Depression, anxiety attacks, sleep disorders,
    flashbacks to the experience, and nightmares.
  • Pt who have no explicit recall of intraop events,
    but who develop symptoms suggestive of
    intraoperative awareness, such as recurrent
    dreams about being buried alive.
  • A pts understanding of their experiences can
    affect the psychological impact of awareness.
  • Pt may think their awareness is impossible
  • Leading them to become confused or question their
    own sanity.

16
Medicolegal consequences of awareness during
general anesthesia
  • Legal action against their anesthesia providers
  • Woman, complain of PTSD
  • ASA closed claim database
  • 1971 -2001 1 - 3 continue growing.
  • Reported awards to pts for awareness with recall
  • 1000 600, 000
  • Several actions (Table 2)
  • Reduce the psychological harm to the patient and
    probability of legal action.

17
Strategies to prevent awareness during general
anesthesia
18
To use electroencephalographic awareness monitors
or not
  • Most visible controversy
  • Use of EEG monitors for anesthetic depth
  • A follow-up study to the Swedish awareness survey
  • Routine use of BIS monitoring reduced
    intraoperative awareness by nearly 80
  • Uncertainty about whether methodology in the two
    groups was identical make this result
    questionable.
  • Randomization to BIS/No BIS was applied to high
    risk pts
  • Incidence of explicit awareness
  • 80 lower in pts with BIS guided anesthesia
  • Incidence of probable and possible
    awareness was not reduced
  • US multi-center study
  • Higher rate of intraoperative awareness with
    recall among BIS monitored pts.
  • Applied device incorrectly or they failed to
    appropriately use the information the monitor
    provides.

19
To use electroencephalographic awareness monitors
or not
  • A per pt. cost of 20 for BIS disposables and an
    assumed average malpractice payout of 50,000 if
    a malpractice payout is made for one in every
    2500 cases.
  • High-risk patients
  • The incidence of intraoperative awareness
  • 0.5-2 or higher (ie, trauma)
  • The patient should be informed of the risk of
    intraoperative awareness, and the use of
    awareness monitoring is justified.
  • Currently available EEG monitoring is not a
    panacea for the problem of intraop. Awareness.
  • Remember that BIS only reduces the incidence of
    awareness with recall, and not other more
    frequent types of pt awareness reports.
  • In the end, decision regarding routine use of
    monitors depend on the cost of avoiding harm vs
    the value that the anesthesist and pt place on
    avoiding that harm.

20
Anesthetic drugs, awareness, and
electroencephalographic monitoring
  • Opioids
  • Alone use
  • Do not suppress awareness
  • Large doses
  • Unresponsive to pain
  • Respond to loud noises and remain aware of their
    surroundings
  • when added to N2O
  • Do not alter the incidence of awareness
  • Do not alter basal BIS measurements
  • Opioids
  • Reduce the amount of cortical arousal asso. with
    peripheral pain
  • Reduce the possibility that surgical pain will
    cause pt to awaken.
  • Psychological trauma asso. with awareness and
    pain is greater than that of awarenes without pain

21
Anesthetic drugs, awareness, and
electroencephalographic monitoring
  • Propofol, barbiturates, etomidate, and
    halogenated volatile agents
  • Modulate GABAA R. activity
  • Shift the cortical EEG to lower frequencies
  • BIS and EEG based monitor
  • Provide strong correlation with hypnosis for this
    group
  • N2O and ketamine
  • Do not modulate GABAA R., but they do produce
    hypnosis
  • Unchanged or increased high frequency EEG signals
  • High reported incidence of dreaming during
    anesthesia
  • BIS and EEG monitors
  • Do not accurately predict the depth of anesthesia
  • New correlates of consciousness
  • Lead to development of more universally
    applicable monitors for anesthetic depth.
  • Potent analgesia- NMDA receptor inhibition in
    spinal cord.
  • Suppress cortical arousal during painful
    stimulation reduce the prabability of awareness

22
Anesthetic drugs, awareness, and
electroencephalographic monitoring
  • N2O-volatile mixtures
  • MAC for N2O and voaltile agent
  • Additive
  • Eg, mixture of 0.5 MAC N2O 0.5 MAC volatile
    agent
  • Supress movement in response to pain like 1 MAC
    volatile
  • Hypnotic activities of N2O and volatile agent
  • Sub-additive
  • Eg, mixture of 0.5MAC awake N2O 0.5 MAC awake
    volatile agent
  • Is not as hypnotic as 1 MAC awake volatile
  • N2O
  • Antagonizes the hypnosis induced by volatile
    agent, perhaps via direct cortical arousal.

23
Summary and recommendations
  • ASA Taskforce
  • It is up to you to decide what is best for your
    patient.
  • Anesthesist should educate themselves thoroughly
    about intraop. Awareness and pre-anesthetic
    evaluation(pts risk for this problem)
  • Strategies to reduce the chance of awareness
    should be applied whenever possible.
  • Postop. Patient should be asked questions
    designed to elicit reports of awareness
    experience
  • Intraop awareness is suspected,
  • Responsible anesthetist, their departmental
    administrators, and quality assurance team
    members
  • Activate a series of interventions
  • Defining the nature of the events and its causes,
    while minimizing its impact by providing
    supportive care to patients
  • High risk for intraop awareness should be
    informed about their status
  • Anesthetic plans should explicitly incorporate
    approaches to reduce this risk, including the use
    of EEG-based monitoring.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com