Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges

Description:

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges Uyen Trang Nguyen Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering York University (Toronto, Canada) Wireless Networks: Taxonomy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:540
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Dept47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges


1
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Issues and Challenges
  • Uyen Trang Nguyen
  • Dept. of Computer Science Engineering
  • York University (Toronto, Canada)

2
Wireless Networks Taxonomy
Wireless Networks
Infrastructure-based
Infrastructureless
Cellular Networks
Static Nodes
Mobile Nodes
Wireless LANs
Ad Hoc Networks
Mobile Adhoc Networks
Sensor Networks
3
MANETs Introduction
  • No infrastructure (no base stations or access
    points)
  • Mobile nodes
  • Form a network in an ad-hoc manner
  • Act both as hosts and routers
  • Communicate using single or multi-hop wireless
    links
  • Topology, locations, connectivity, transmission
    quality are variable.

4
Operations
X
D
D
Y
X
Z
S
S
5
Applications
  • Civil
  • Disaster recovery
  • Taxi cabs
  • Communications over water using floats
  • Vehicular ad-hoc network
  • Defense
  • Battlefield communications
  • Monitoring and planning

6
Challenges
  • Unpredictable mobility
  • Wireless channels error-prone media
  • Low bandwidth channels
  • Devices low power, limited resources
  • Maintaining connectivity, states
  • Security

7
Issues to Be Discussed
  • Medium access control
  • Transport layer issues
  • Security
  • Incentives for cooperation

8
MAC for MANETs Requirements
  • To avoid interference among simultaneous
    transmissions
  • But enable as many non-interfering transmission
    as possible
  • Maintain fairness among transmissions
  • No centralized coordinators fully distributed
    operations
  • No clock synchronization asynchronous operations

9
Carrier Sensing in MANETs
  • Problems
  • Hidden terminal problem
  • Exposed terminal problem
  • Sensing range ? Transmission range
  • Contention matters only at the receivers end

10
Hidden Terminal Problem
B
A
X
No carrier ? OK to transmit
11
Exposed Terminal Problem
B
A
X
Y
Presence of carrier ? holds off transmission
12
MACs Suitable for MANETs
  • MACA Karn 1990
  • Proposes to solve the hidden terminal problem by
    RTS/CTS dialog
  • MACAW Bharghanvan 1994
  • Increasing reliability by RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK dialog
  • IEEE 802.11
  • Distributed Coordination Function (DCF)
  • Also use RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK dialog

13
RTS/CTS dialog (1)
Defer
RTS
Any node hearing this RTS will defer medium access
14
RTS/CTS dialog (2)
Defer
Defer
RTS
CTS
Any node hearing this CTS will defer medium access
15
RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK dialog
Defer
Defer
Data
ACK
16
IEEE 802.11 DCF
  • Uses RTS/CTS exchange to avoid hidden terminal
    problem
  • Any node overhearing a CTS cannot transmit for
    the duration of the transfer.
  • Any node overhearing an RTS cannot transmit for
    the duration of the transfer (to avoid collision
    with ACK)
  • Uses ACK to achieve reliability
  • CSMA/CA
  • Contention-based random access
  • Collision detection not possible while
    transmitting

17
IEEE 802.11 DCF (cont.)
  • Carrier sense in 802.11
  • Physical carrier sense
  • Virtual carrier sense using Network Allocation
    Vector (NAV)
  • RTS/CTS specify duration of subsequent DATA/ACK
  • NAV is updated based on overheard RTS/CTS
  • Collision avoidance
  • Nodes stay silent when carrier sensed busy
    (physical/virtual)
  • Backoff intervals are used to reduce collision
    probability

18
Backoff Interval
  • When channel is busy, choose a backoff interval
    in the range 0, cw.
  • Count down the backoff interval when medium
    becomes idle.
  • Count down is suspended if medium becomes busy
    again.
  • When backoff interval reaches 0, transmit RTS.
  • Binary exponential backoff in 802.11 DCF
  • When a node fails to receive CTS, cw is doubled
    up (up to an upper bound).
  • When a data transfer completes successfully, cw
    is reset to cwmin.

19
IEEE 802.11 CSMA/CA Example
  • DIFS DCF inter-frame space SISF short
    inter-frame space

20
Disadvantages of IEEE 802.11 DCF
  • High power consumption
  • Hidden terminal problem not totally solved (e.g.,
    collision of RTS)
  • Exposed terminal problem not solved
  • Fairness problem among different transmitting
    nodes
  • Only providing best-effort service

21
MAC for Multicast a Challenging Issue
  • Multicast efficient info delivery from a source
    to a set of destinations simultaneously
  • Uses 802.11 CSMA/CA
  • Cannot use RTS/CTS exchange
  • Currently there are no effective MAC protocols
    for multicast

22
Issues to Be Discussed
  • Medium access control
  • Transport layer issues
  • Security
  • Incentives for cooperation

23
TCP in Wired Networks
  • Receiver sends ACKs for packets received
    correctly
  • Sender times out on unacknowledged packets,
    retransmits
  • Sender adjusts congestion window

24
TCP in MANETs
  • TCP is designed for wired networks
  • Low bit error rate
  • Loss mainly caused by congestion
  • Routes relatively fixed
  • TCP in MANETs
  • High bit error rate
  • Unreliable wireless channels
  • Route changes due to node mobility

25
Consequences
  • TCP sender misinterprets losses as congestion
  • retransmits unacknowledged segments
  • Why retransmit when there is no route
  • invokes congestion control
  • enters slow start recovery
  • Throughput is always low
  • Why use TCP at all in such cases?
  • For interactions with the Internet and seamless
    portability to applications using standard TCP
    (file transfer, email, browsers).

26
Approaches to Improving TCP
  • Hide error losses from the sender
  • Sender will not reduce congestion window
  • Determine the cause of loss
  • If due to errors, do not reduce window size
  • Modifications are done at
  • the sender only
  • the receiver
  • intermediate nodes only
  • combinations of the above

27
ATCP in the TCP/IP Stack
Sender
Receiver
TCP
TCP
ATCP
IP
IP
Link layer
Link layer
28
ATCP Approach
  • Uses network layer feedback from intermediates
    nodes for appropriate actions
  • Different types of network feedback
  • ICMP Destination Unreachable message indicates
    route break
  • Stops transmission
  • Waits until a new route is found and resumes trx
  • ECN ACK with ECN flag indicates network
    congestion
  • Invokes congestion control
  • Retransmission time-out or 3 duplicate ACKs
  • Retransmits unacknowledged segments without
    shrinking congestion window

29
Multicast Transport
  • Reliable delivery
  • Feedback ACK, NACK
  • Congestion control
  • Feedback loss rate, data rate
  • Group-based
  • not scalable
  • feedback implosion
  • exposure
  • Tree-based
  • scalable
  • feedback implosion solved
  • limited exposure

30
Multicast Transport in MANETs a Challenging
Issue
  • Tree-based
  • extremely difficult to establish a tree-based
    structure due to node mobility
  • Group-based
  • not scalable
  • feedback suppression random timer, probabilistic
  • multiple simultaneous transmissions potential
    collisions
  • Calculation of round-trip-time difficult due to
  • node mobility
  • route break

31
Issues to Be Discussed
  • Medium access control
  • Transport layer issues
  • Security
  • Incentives for cooperation

32
Vulnerabilities of MANETs
  • Wireless links ? jamming
  • Broadcast nature ? eavesdropping
  • Mobility, dynamics ? difficult to detect
    anomalies (e.g., bogus routes)
  • No central authorities or infrastructures
  • ? difficult key management
  • Trade-offs between resource constraints and
    security

33
Potential Attacks
  • Impersonation
  • An attacker assumes identity and privileges of an
    authorized node
  • Denial of service (e.g., jamming, flooding)
  • Network layer attacks
  • Blackhole
  • a node falsely advertises good paths
  • drops packets
  • Wormhole 2 colluding attackers form a tunnel
  • Byzantine creating routing loops, non-optimal
    paths
  • Resource consumption attack generating
    unnecessary packets (false route requests,
    beacons)

34
Attack Countermeasures
  • Defense against external attacks
  • Authentication encryption (needs key and trust
    management)
  • Defense against internal attacks
  • Secure routing protocols (e.g. SEAD, ARAN, SAODV)
  • Protect routing metrics by hashing
  • Intrusion detection techniques
  • CONFIDANT

35
Security Open Issues
  • Key management
  • Still relies on a central authority (or a group
    of trusted nodes)
  • Consumes high power for processing
  • Intrusion detection
  • Can only detect a group of potential attackers
  • Cannot single out the true attackers or
    compromised nodes
  • High rate of false alarm due to unreliable
    wireless links and randomness of channel access
  • No solutions to flooding/jamming attacks
  • Incentives for nodes to cooperate

36
Issues to Be Discussed
  • Medium access control
  • Transport layer issues
  • Security
  • Incentives for cooperation

37
Incentives
  • Rewards per-hop payment in every packet or in
    counters embedded in nodes
  • may not always be effective
  • Punishment
  • punishing both selfish and malicious nodes
  • Example CONFIDANT Buchegger 2002
  • Based on the biological example in The Selfish
    Gene by Richard Dawkins (Oxford University
    Press, 1989 edition, 1976)

38
The Selfish Gene
  • Reciprocal altruism is beneficial for every
    biological system when favors are granted
    simultaneously
  • Example survival chances of birds grooming
    parasites off each others head.
  • 3 types of birds
  • Suckers always help others
  • Cheats get help from but never help others
  • Grudgers start out by helping every bird
  • but bears a grudge against those that do not help
  • and subsequently no longer groom their heads

39
CONFIDANT
  • Every node has 4 components
  • The monitor
  • The trust manager
  • The reputation system (node rating)
  • The path manager

40
CONFIDANT Components
  • The monitor neighborhood watch
  • Listening to transmissions of next nodes
  • Observing route protocol behaviors (no
    forwarding, unusual route attraction, unusually
    frequent route updates)
  • Calling the reputation system when a bad behavior
    is detected
  • The trust manager distributed and adaptive
  • Using trust function to calculate trust levels
  • Forwarding ALARM messages to warn others of
    malicious/selfish nodes
  • Filtering ALARM messages based on trust level of
    the reporting node

41
CONFIDANT Components (cont.)
  • The reputation system (node rating) based on
  • Own experience greatest weight
  • Observations smaller weight
  • Reported experience (from ALARM messages) weight
    function according to trust level
  • Rating lists are maintained locally, may be
    exchanged with friends
  • The path manager
  • Deleting paths containing malicious nodes
  • Dealing with route requests from malicious nodes
    (e.g., ignore, alert the source)

42
Disadvantages of CONFIDANT
  • Authentication is a prerequisite
  • Requires efficient key management
  • Implementing all the components
  • requires high processing power and storage
  • incurs lots of overheads

43
Summary
  • MANETs
  • Unpredictable mobility
  • Low bandwidth channels
  • Wireless channels error-prone media, vulnerable
    to attacks
  • Devices low power, limited resources
  • Issues
  • Medium access control
  • Transport layer issues
  • Security
  • Incentives for cooperation

44
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com