Poster - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Poster

Description:

The Effect of Miscommunication Rate on User Response Preferences Hua Ai, University of Pittsburgh Thomas Harris, Carolyn Penstein Ros , Carnegie Mellon University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Branisla8
Category:
Tags: poster | wizard

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poster


1
The Effect of Miscommunication Rate on User
Response Preferences Hua Ai, University of
Pittsburgh Thomas Harris, Carolyn Penstein Rosé,
Carnegie Mellon University
Show Tell
2 Speech Modality
1 Motivation Smart Home
  • Prompt users to switch to direct manipulation
    when continuous errors occur
  • Direct manipulation serves as an interpretation
    of users speech input to train the speech
    recognizer
  • Direct manipulation makes the user feel in
    control, thus increases user satisfaction rate

Voice-control Air conditioner
Smart Kitchen
Security System
Remote Water Monitoring
However, the undesirable error rate and the high
cost of error resolution degrade system
performance and frustrate users
However, How likely will the user follow the
system prompts to resort direct manipulation?
Personalized Room Modes
Garage Door Sensors
3 Wizard-of-Oz Experiments
4 Conclusions
System prompts Miscommunication
condition askRepeat Could you repeat
that? showMe Could you show me what do you
mean? Normal condition ok OK, Ill do that
for you. Done Im done!
Miscommunication Rate Low error rate (30) Mid
error rate (50) High error rate (70)
  • While user does not always follow the systems
    advice, it does have an effect on their choice
    regardless of misrecognition rate
  • Significant effect of system response to
    miscommunication on the likelihood of user direct
    manipulation (Plt.05) and Repeat (Plt.05)
  • Overall, users were significantly more likely to
    continue with speech interaction when the system
    ask the user to repeat (p lt .01)
  • While we would predict that users are more likely
    to resort to direct manipulation as
    miscommunication rate increased, our surprising
    finding was that users were most likely to resort
    to direct manipulation where communication
    success was least predictable. we found a
    significant effect of High versus Low Certainty
    on the likelihood of Direct Manipulation (p lt
    .005) and likelihood of continuing with speech (p
    lt .01)

Stereo
User actions Direct Manipulation Repeat Rephrase
  • Experimental Design
  • 3X2 within subjects Factorial Design
  • explore the separate and joint effects of 3
    miscommunication rate and 2 system response to
    miscommunications (askRepeat and showMe) on user
    behavior
  • Experimental setups
  • 9 subjects, 4 females and 5 males, recruited on
    CMU campus.
  • Each subject is required to complete 10 tasks
    with a stereo while staying alive in an eyes
    hands busy video game.
  • Sample task turn the stereo on, play a CD, skip
    over a song, etc.
  • Subjects are told that the stereo is an
    intelligent stereo that can accept commands
    either via direct manipulation or through speech
    commands. No vocabulary list is given.
  • Subjects are randomly assigned to the 3
    miscommunication rate conditions, 3 people per
    group.
  • A wizard plays the pre-recorded system prompts to
    interact with the subjects.
  • The wizard decides the faked miscommunication
    points according to a pre-defined random
    sequence. Then either askRepeat or showMe prompts
    are given.
  • The subject can response by Direct Manipulation
    or speech (Repeat or Rephrase).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com