Abuse of Dominance: Designing remedial measures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Abuse of Dominance: Designing remedial measures

Description:

Abuse of Dominance: Designing remedial measures Jennifer Skilbeck 13th January 2006 for VCAD Remedies in Vietnamese Competition Law Remedies may be divided into 4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: alancar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Abuse of Dominance: Designing remedial measures


1
Abuse of Dominance Designing remedial measures
  • Jennifer Skilbeck
  • 13th January 2006
  • for VCAD

2
Remedies in Vietnamese Competition Law
  • Remedies may be divided into 4 categories
  • Interim measures (Article 61)
  • Final measures such as fines, penalties and
    Declarations (Article 117(23))
  • Compulsory licensing
  • Restructuring (Article 117(3))

3
1. Interim measures
  • Stop now provisions, eg
  • Do not raise prices,
  • continue supply
  • These are kept in place until the question has
    been fully resolved by the competition
    authorities.

4
2. Fines penalties
  • A number of fines and penalties are set out in
    the Law (Article 117). These are self
    explanatory
  • These provisions are useful as deterrents
  • It is believed in the UK that the threat of being
    denied directorships of companies is a very
    significant deterrent

5
Declarations
  • This term is used to refer to any decision
    addressed to an organisation by a regulatory
    authority or court, eg
  • the organisation must not charge X a higher
    price than Y, or
  • X may not withhold supplies from Y

6
The use of Declarations
  • A finding of fact will generally be sufficient,
    without a Declaration
  • If the firm continues to act unlawfully, then
    penalties and specific Declarations may follow.

7
Declarations following undertakings
  • Undertakings (eg to continue supply) may be
    obtained to settle a matter. Then a company acts
    unlawfully if it breaches its undertakings, and
    Declarations may follow

8
Declarations that pose difficulties
  • Declarations that require supervision by the
    courts eg complex access issues (telecoms)
  • Declarations that require cost or price
    calculations (these calculations are usually
    carried out by specialist regulators and then
    challenged in the courts)

9
3. Compulsory licensing
  • Politically controversial
  • Difficult to fix a fair royalty
  • Can sometimes be avoided by controlling prices of
    the owner of the intellectual property under
    abuse of dominance provisions
  • May be able to obtain supplies under the
    essential facilities doctrine

10
4. Industry restructuring
  • Organisations may be broken up
  • Into different functional parts of the business
    (vertical separation), or
  • Into smaller similar units (horizontal
    separation), or
  • Access to a monopolists assets may be given to
    other businesses.
  • The UK probably has more experience of these
    remedies than any other jurisdiction

11
4(1) Vertical separation UK Gas
  • British Gas (privately owned) was separated into
    a pipelines business providing the infrastructure
    (Transco), and a retail business selling to
    customers (British Gas).
  • The retail business was then opened to
    competition.
  • Companies buy gas under long term contracts and
    compete to sell to customers.
  • Only one gas is carried through the pipes and
    competition is financial only

12
4(2) Vertical separation UK postal services
  • The publicly owned postal service was separated
    into counter services (The Post Office) and
    delivery (The Royal Mail)
  • Both services are now open to competition
  • It is expected that post will still be delivered
    by Royal Mail as a contractor to all postal
    services

13
Ensuring the supply is provided by the network
owner
  • Failure by the owners of the gas and postal
    networks to supply access to competitors would be
    an abuse of a dominant position
  • If others enter the market (possibly postal
    delivery) then the present supplier may no longer
    be dominant

14
4(2) Horizontal separation UK breweries
  • The few main breweries owned large numbers of
    bars in which only their own beers were available
  • They were obliged to sell a large number of their
    outlets
  • In addition they had to provide a guest beer
    brewed by another brewery in every bar

15
4(2) Horizontal separation UK water industry
  • The water industry (publicly owned) was separated
    into geographical sections and each sold to the
    private sector
  • Mergers and takeovers are permitted subject to
    the merger rules, which helps to encourage
    efficiency.

16
3. Access arrangements telecoms and broadcasting
  • The privatised telecoms company is required to
    give access to its network to other telephone
    companies for landline calls and broadband
  • Television companies are required to outsource
    25 of their programmes to independent programme
    makers

17
The typical results
  • Increased efficiency and lower prices
  • And a failure
  • The railways were separated into one private
    company to run the network (the track) and
    several others to run the trains.
  • Safety expenditure was reduced by the network
    company to an unacceptable level and the network
    (only) was returned to public ownership.

18
Supervisory issues
  • In most cases monopoly issues remain
  • Most of these industries have a specific Regulator

19
Some regulatory tasks
  • Access
  • The price at which access is given in telecoms
    must be negotiated
  • Physical access terms must be agreed for the
    competitors to link physically to the telecoms
    supplier

20
Price control one supplier only (UK airports)
  • A price formula is based on the retail price
    index (RPI)
  • Costs, revenues and a fair return on capital are
    calculated by the regulator for a 5 year period
  • A price formula of RPIx is calculated (eg RPI1,
    RPI-2)
  • The company then has an incentive to reduce costs
    throughout the period to increase profits
  • The efficiencies lead to a lower price formula
    for the next 5 years

21
Price control many suppliers (UK water)
  • There are many water suppliers, each dominant
    in its area
  • Costs are calculated for each company and a
    relative index is calculated, ranked by
    efficiency, taking account of differing cost
    conditions
  • Prices for each are fixed combining actual costs
    and those achieved by the most efficient
    companies and fixed for five years

22
Price controls objectives
  • Ensure some element of competition
  • Provide an incentive to increase profits through
    efficiencies
  • Return the benefits of those efficiencies to the
    consumers in the next period

23
Competition through licensing
  • The right to run a utility may be sold by tender
  • Competitions may be held every few years,
    depending on the levels of investment the
    licensee must make
  • Examples (UK) railways, oil rights,
    broadcasting, motorway service stations

24
Licensing advantages
  • Provides government revenue
  • Licenses can be sold on the basis of specified
    prices to consumers
  • Little regulation required
  • BUT
  • Low incentive on licensee to invest in safety
    (railways, water)

25
Finally
  • Privatisation and competition (even if
    artificial) has led to great benefits to
    consumers in the UK
  • Pricing etc issues are increasingly complex to
    provide appropriate incentives
  • Main difficulty encouraging investment,
    specially in safety

26
Thank You
  • For more information
  • www.monckton.com
  • and
  • jskilbeck_at_monckton.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com