F.F. Dragan (Kent State) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

F.F. Dragan (Kent State)

Description:

F.F. Dragan (Kent State) A.B. Kahng (UCSD) I. Mandoiu (Georgia Tech/UCLA) S. Muddu (Silicon Graphics) A. Zelikovsky (Georgia State) Global Buffering via Buffer Blocks ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: ionma
Learn more at: https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu
Category:
Tags: buffers | dragan | kent | state

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: F.F. Dragan (Kent State)


1
Provably Good Global Buffering Using an Available
Buffer Block Plan
  • F.F. Dragan (Kent State)
  • A.B. Kahng (UCSD)
  • I. Mandoiu (Georgia Tech/UCLA)
  • S. Muddu (Silicon Graphics)
  • A. Zelikovsky (Georgia State)

2
Global Buffering via Buffer Blocks
  • VDSM ? buffer / inverter insertion for all global
    nets
  • 50nm technology ? 106 buffers
  • Buffer Block (BB) methodology
  • isolate buffer insertion from block
    implementations
  • improve routing area resources (RAR) utilization
  • RAR(2k-buffer block) ? ? RAR(k-buffer
    block)
  • For high-end designs ? ? 1.6
  • Buffer block planning Cong99 TangW00
  • given block placement nets
  • find shape and location of BBs
  • Global buffering via BBs
  • given nets BB locations and capacities
  • find buffered routing for each net

3
Global Buffering via Buffer Blocks
4
Global Buffering Problem
  • Given
  • Pin BB locations, BB capacities
  • list of 2-pin nets, each net has
  • upper-bound on buffers
  • parity requirement on buffers
  • non-negative weight (criticality coefficient)
  • L/U bounds on wirelength b/w consecutive
    buffers/pins
  • Find buffered routing of a maximum weighted
    number of nets subject to the given constraints

5
Global Buffering Problem
  • Given
  • Pin BB locations, BB capacities
  • list of 2-pin nets, each net has
  • upper-bound on buffers
    new
  • parity requirement on buffers
    new
  • non-negative weight (criticality coefficient)
    new
  • L/U bounds on wirelength b/w consecutive
    buffers/pins
  • Find buffered routing of a maximum weighted
    number of nets subject to the given constraints
  • Previous work 1 buffer per connection, no weights

6
Outline of Results
  • Provably good algorithm for the Global Buffering
    Problem
  • integer node-capacitated multi-commodity flow
    (MCF) formulation
  • approximation algorithm for solving fractional
    relaxation
  • provably good randomized rounding based on
    RaghavanT87
  • allows tradeoff between run-time and solution
    quality
  • Fast heuristic based on ideas from the
    approximation algorithm
  • superior to simpler greedy approaches
  • almost matches the provably good algorithm for
    loosely constrained instances

7
Integer Program Formulation
8
High-Level Approach
  • Solve fractional relaxation rounding
  • first introduced for global routing RaghavanT87
  • fractional relaxation node-capacitated
    multi-commodity flow (MCF)
  • can be solved exactly using Linear Programming
    (LP) techniques
  • exact LP algorithms are not practical for large
    instances
  • Key idea approximate solution to the relaxation
  • we generalize edge-capacitated MCF approximation
    of GargK98, F99
  • GargK98 successfully applied to global routing
    by Albrecht00

9
Approximating the Fractional MCF
  • ?-MCF algorithm
  • w(v) ?, f 0
  • For i 1 to N do
  • For k 1, , nets do
  • Find a shortest path p ? P for net k
  • While w(p) lt min 1, ?(12?)I do
  • f(p) f(p) 1
  • For every v ? p do
  • w(v) ? ( 1 ?/c(v) ) w(v)
  • End For
  • End While
  • End For
  • End For
  • Output f/N

Run time for ?-approximation
10
Rounding to an Integer Solution
  • Random walk algorithm RaghavanT87
  • probability of routing a net proportional to
    nets flow
  • probability of choosing an arc proportional to
    fractional flow along arc
  • run time O( inserted buffers )
  • To avoid BB overuse, scale-down fractional flow
    by 1-? before rounding
  • Modifications
  • approximate MCF underestimates optimum
  • ? few violations unused BB capacity for large ?
  • resolve capacity violations by greedily deleting
    paths
  • greedily route remaining nets using unused BB
    capacity

11
Implemented Heuristics
  • ?-MCF w/ greedy enhancement
  • solve fractional MCF with ? approximation
  • round fractional solution via random walks
  • apply greedy deletion/addition to get feasible
    solution
  • Greedy
  • sequentially route nets along shortest available
    paths
  • 1-shot integer MCF
  • assign weight w1 to each BB
  • repeat until total overused capacity does not
    decrease
  • for each net find shortest path
  • for each BB r increase weight by factor (1 ?
    usage(r) / cap(r))
  • apply greedy deletion/addition to get feasible
    solution

12
Experimental Setup
  • Test instances extracted from next-generation SGI
    microprocessor
  • 4,000 nets
  • U4,000 ?m, L500-2,000 ?m
  • 50 buffer blocks
  • BB capacity
  • 400 (fully routable instances)
  • 50 (hard instances, 50-60 routable)

13
Fully Routable Instance (4212 nets)
14
Fully Routable Instance (4212 nets)
15
Running Time vs. Solution Quality
16
57 Routable Instance (4212 nets)
17
Conclusions and Ongoing Work
  • Provably good algorithm based on node-capacitated
    MCF approximation
  • Extensions
  • combine global buffering with BB planning
  • combine with compaction

18
Combining with compaction
19
Combining with compaction
20
Combining with compaction
  • Sum-capacity constraints cap(BB1) cap(BB2) ?
    const.

21
Conclusions and Ongoing Work
  • Provably good algorithm based on node-capacitated
    MCF approximation
  • Extensions
  • combine global buffering with BB planning
  • combine with compaction
  • enforce channel capacity constraints
  • multi-terminal nets (ASPDAC-01)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com