wounds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

wounds

Description:

... Klebsiella spp. Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp. Diabetic foot ulcers Aerobes: Staph aureus, Streptococcus spp. P. aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: mic5161
Category:
Tags: candida | wounds

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: wounds


1
(No Transcript)
2
Wound Infection
  • Dr. Kiarash Ghazvini
  • Department for bacteriology and virology,
  • Mashhad University of medical Sciences

3
WOUNDS AND ABSCESS
  • Infections of soft tissues are associated with
    production of pus and said pyogenic.
  • A wide variety aerobic and anaerobic species
    participate singly or in combination in
    infectious of wounds.

4
WOUNDS AND ABSCESS
  • The commonest pyogenic bacteria are S.aureus, S
    .pyogenes ,P. aeruginosa, coliforms bacilli.,
    anaerobic organisem particularly Clostridium
    perfringens , bacteroides spp ,anaerobic cocci..
  • In many cases there is a mixed infection with
    more than one bacterial spp.

5
wounds
  • Wound infections may be endogenous or exogenous.
  • Endogenous infections are caused by organisms
    that are in commensal in the patient .
  • Exogenous infections the source is out of the
    body cross-infection is a particular example.the
    causal organism is spread from person to person.
    infection may occur after accidental or
    intentional trauma of the skin or tissue.
    (Surgical postoperative sepsis. )

6
  • Wounds are liable to contamination with a
    multiplicity of organisms from the body surfaces
    and environment.
  • Infection of a wound is difficult to define , and
    no clear rules can be given to distinguish it
    from colonization and contamination.

7
Contamination
  • The contaminating organisms are present in small
    numbers

8
Colonization
  • In the case of commensal or low grade pathogenes
    it can be described colonization.

9
Infection
  • Infection occurs when they evades the host
    defences.replicates in large numbers and attacks
    the host tissue.

10
WoundsClassification
  • Acute
  • Caused by external damage to intact skin
  • Types
  • Surgical
  • Bites
  • Burns
  • Minor cuts
  • Abrasions
  • Severe traumatic
  • Chronic
  • Precipitated by predisposing conditions that lead
    to compromise of dermal/epidermal tissue
  • Types
  • Impaired venous drainage
  • Impaired arterial supply
  • Metabolic diseases eg. diabetes

11
Wound infections Etiology
  • Surgical wounds
  • Aerobes S. aureus, coagulase negative
    staphylococci, Enterococcus spp. E. coli, P.
    aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.
  • Anaerobes Bacteroides spp., Peptostreptococcus,
    Closthdium spp.
  • Acute soft tissue infections
  • Staph aureus only organism in 30
  • 30-50 mixed aerobes/anaerobes
  • 20-30 other eg. Group A streptococci,
    Clostridium spp.
  • Bite wounds
  • Special pathogens Pasteurella muftocida,
    Capnocytophaga canimorsus, Bartonella henselae,
    Eikenelfa corrodens
  • Other mixed aerobes and anaerobes

12
Wound infections Etiology
  • Burn wounds
  • Primarily aerobic organisms P. aeruginosa,
    Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella spp.
    Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp.
  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Aerobes Staph aureus, Streptococcus spp. P.
    aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., enterics
  • Anaerobes Peptostreptococcus, Bacteroides spp.,
    Prevotella spp.
  • Decubitus ulcers
  • Mixed aerobic and anaerobic bacteria

13
SAMPLING
  • Biopsy
  • ? Aspirate from depth of the wound
  • if possible pus or exudate should be submitted in
    a small screw-capped bottle, a firmly stoppered
    tube or sterile syringe and needle.

14
SAMPLING
  • Swabs are inefficient sampling and are strongly
    discouraged.
  • If it is decided to send swabs tow swab is
    necessary , one for microscopy ,one for culture.

15
SAMPLING
  • Delay in the transit of specimen to the
    laboratory must be avoided.especially swabs where
    the exudate may dry.

16
CONTINUE
  • If the swab is dry, moisture it well with a
    little sterile broth or saline .
  • the examination of material on swabs for
    mycobacteria is always unsatisfactory.
  • Physicians should be instructed that when a
    special investigation is required ,they usually
    should state on the request form.

17
SAMPLING
  • ? Clean the wound margins with 70 ethyl alcohol.

18
Wound Cultures
  • For closed Wounds
  • Prepared site as described for obtaining Blood
    Culture
  • Aspirate as much purulant material as possible
  • Transport in aerobic /anaerobic transport media

19
Laboratory examination
  • Special methods of examination should be applied
    to particular specimens.
  • the basic procedures usually include
  • Naked eye examination, (for macroscopy criteria
    ,such as color , odor consistency,..)
  • The microscopical examination,
  • Culture on aerobic and anaerobic blood agar
    plates, on MacConkey agar and in cooked meat
    broth .

20
Microscopy
  • Much useful information may be obtained from
    smear by Gram-staining. We should notice
  • presence and relative numbers of PMNs , SEC and
    bacteria
  • morphology of Gram positive or Gram negative
    bacteria.
  • Examination of a wet film for fungi or motile
    bacteria.
  • A smear stained by the Ziehl- Neelsen method
    should be examined when the clinical
    circumstances suggest the tubercle bacillus.,
    another mycobacterium or a nocardia may be
    present

21
Wound Cultures
  • Culture for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria if
    appropriately collected
  • Gram stain results suggest adequate collection or
    presence of inflammation
  • Tissues or aspirates vs. swabs
  • Primary plating media 5 SBA, Choc agar,
    MacConkey agar anaerobic plates and thio if
    appropriately collected
  • Identify anaerobes to Genus level only
  • Perform susceptibility testing of predominant
    organisms only

22
CULTURE
  • the specimen should be inoculated on two plates
    of blood agar (SBA 5),
  • the one for incubation at 37c, 5-10 CO2.,for
    18-24h.
  • The other for incubation anaerobically .
  • It should also be plated on Mac Conkey or CLED
    agar, for identification of coliforms ,
    staphylococci , enterococci, also be inoculated
    into a tube of cooked meat broth for the
    enrichment of exacting aerobes and anaerobes.

23
CULTURE
  • Colonies should be noted and more tests for
    identification and antibiotic susceptibility
    tests done.
  • If there is no growth after 24h ,all plates
    should be reincubated for another 24h
  • for slow-growing pathogen such as Actinomyces
    israeli or some species of bacteroides it should
    be incubated longer for about 7 days.

24
CULTURE
  • if at 24 h or 48 h there is growth on cooked-meat
    broth , but no growth on the plates , the broth
    should be filmed and subcultured.
  • if tuberculous or fungal infection is suspected ,
    the specimen should be cultured by the
    appropriate methods on special media.

25
Wound Cultures Extent of Workup
  • Possible approaches
  • Use Gram stain result
  • Work up organisms seen on stain only
  • List others
  • Work up any potential pathogens to maximum of
    three, list others present by morphology
  • Work up any quantity S. aureus, P. aeruginosa,
    beta hemolytic streptococci, enterics and
    gram-negative anaerobes

26
Wound Specimens Algorithms
  • Three approaches
  • PMN predominance
  • Q-Score
  • Q-2-3-4 system

27
(No Transcript)
28
Wound Cultures Examples
  • Gram stain results (Acceptable)
  • Many neutrophils, no epithelial cells, Many gram
    positive cocci in clusters, Many gram negative
    bacilli, Few morphotypes resembling skin flora
  • Work up (identify and perform susceptibility
    testing) Gram positive cocci in clusters and
    gram neg bacilli
  • Culture report Many S. aureus, many Klebsiella
    pneumoniae, light aerobic bacteria resembling
    skin flora

29
Workup of Wound Cultures
  • Q-Score System
  • Good quality specimen (Q3)
  • Up to 3 organisms can be considered as potential
    pathogens and worked up (ID/AST)
  • Lower quality specimen (Q2, Q1)
  • More SEC
  • Fewer organisms are worked up

30
Workup of Wound Cultures
  • Q-Score System
  • If the Q-score is greater than or equals the PP
    in culture
  • Workup all potential pathogens
  • If Q-Score is less than the PP in culture
  • Look at the Gram stainWorkup all PP that are
    seen on GSMorphologically ID othersIf all PP
    present on GS then only Morph ID all

31
(No Transcript)
32
Wound Cultures Examples
  • Gram stain many neutrophils, few epithelial
    cells, Gram positive cocci in clusters, Gram
    positive cocci in chains,
  • Culture grows many S. aureus, many Group A
    streptococci, few enteric bacilli
  • Work up S. aureus, Group A streptococcus
    limited ID and no susceptibility on enteric
    bacilli susceptibility testing on Group A strep
    not required

33
Wound Cultures Example
  • Gram stain many neutrophils, few epithelial
    cells, Gram positive cocci in clusters, Gram
    positive cocci in chains,
  • Culture grows many S. aureus, many Group A
    streptococci, few enteric bacilli

34
Workup of Wound Cultures
  • Q/2-3-4 System
  • Culture workup is based on the of PP present
  • 2PP-ID/AST
  • 3PP
  • Look at the Gram stain
  • " Workup two PP if they are seen on GS
  • " If all 3 present on GS then Morph ID
  • 4PP
  • Morph ID only

35
Wound Cultures Example
  • Q score 2 PMN (3), few epi (-1)
  • Q/2-3-4 3 PP
  • look at gram stain
  • Work up S. aureus, Group A streptococcus, Morph
    ID and no susceptibility on enteric bacilli

36
Interpretation and reporting
  • A pure growth of a recognized pathogen obtained
    from a wound or closed abscess is easily
    interpreted as significant and will be reported
    to the physician as being so.
  • Mixed cultures grown from superficial lesions are
    the basic difficulty.

37
Interpretation and reporting
  • Scanty growths of skin commensals such as staph
    or diphteheroid bacilli are usually disregarded
    and not reported. and a few colonies of E.coli
    grown from a perineal . But clostridium
    perfringens is important.
  • In superficial lesions such as varicose ulcers ,
    present of mixed commensal is not important.
  • The result is reported Many mixed fecal and skin
    bacteria present. without giving identities or
    antibiotic sensivities.

38
  • But a pure growth of a commensal from an
    aspirated deep wound is not contamination and
    should be reported with AST performance.
  • In general, a numerous or predominant organism is
    likely to have pathogenic significance.

39
  • But the relative numbers of the colonies of the
    different organisms on a culture plate may not
    reflect the relative numbers of the organisms in
    the lesion .for they are subject to many
    variations such as the relative speed of growth
    of different species., antibiotic interactions
    between different species and the greater
    tendency of the more delicate pathogenes to die
    during transport of specimens.
  • For such reason a causal pathogen may be cultured
    in smaller numbers than a contaminating commensal.

40
Wound Cultures Examples
  • Gram stain Many neutrophils, few epithelial
    cells, multiple morphotypes
  • Culture grows more than 3 potential pathogens
  • Consider source
  • Tissue or aspirate ?
  • Contamination likely ?
  • Type of patient
  • May need to consult with clinician or Infectious
    Diseases service

41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com