SUSTRUS Developing a sustainability model for Russia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

SUSTRUS Developing a sustainability model for Russia

Description:

... rate / fixed exchange rate - regional capital fixed on short term - investment = savings - GDP deflator used as numeraire ... Change 2026 2023 2018 2013 2007 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: trans9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SUSTRUS Developing a sustainability model for Russia


1
SUSTRUSDeveloping a sustainability model for
Russia
  • Christophe Heyndrickx (TML)
  • Victoria Alexeeva-Talebi (ZEW)
  • Natalia Tourdyeva (CEFIR)

2
Overview
  • Introducing the project
  • Model characteristics
  • Applications
  • Conclusions

3
Overview
  • Introducing the project
  • Model characteristics
  • Applications
  • Conclusions

4
The SUSTRUS project
  • Goal Development of a tool for sustainability
    assessment in Russia
  • Partners CEFIR, Ural State University, Voronezh
    State University, Far Eastern Centre for economic
    development, Institute for the Economy in
    Transition, ZEW
  • Time funding 3 years, EU DG Research grant
  • Expected result (s)
  • Development of a regional computable general
    equilibrium model that can be used for integrated
    analysis of current sustainability policy in
    Russia
  • Database on economy, society and environment of
    Russia
  • Results of current policy analyzed with the model

5
Workplan
6
Sustainability ?
  • EU Sustainable development framework
  • Environmental protection
  • Social equity and cohesion
  • Economic prosperity
  • Meeting international responsibilities
  • Russian context
  • Unfavorable demographic situation and low labour
    mobility
  • Agglomeration around large cities (Moskow,
    Sint-Petersburg, Ekaterinburg,..)
  • Medium to highly educated labour force
  • Large areas in very cold regions (economic
    coldness)
  • Misallocated investments in infrastructure and
    economic development under Soviet regime
  • Abundant natural resources (gas, crude oil,
    timber)
  • Dependent on export of resources and primary
    energy
  • Polluted areas and health problems in some
    regions
  • Increasing inequality in income and regional
    development
  • Poor institutional development
  • Large informal economy

7
  • In general, there is no specific model, which
    fits all requirements for comprehensive SIA, but
    rather a package of models or methods depending
    on the policy measure or issue to be assessed and
    the availability of data (Böhringer C., Löschel,
    2006)

8
(No Transcript)
9
Overview
  • Introducing the project
  • Model characteristics
  • Applications
  • Conclusions

10
SUSTRUS (1)
  • Formulation based on our experience with regional
    economic models for Belgium (ISEEM) and the
    Netherlands (RAEM)
  • Some elements were removed, others were extended
    to fit with the Russian context
  • Input and experience with other models (GEM-E-3,
    EPPA, WorldScan)
  • Consumers three household types with LES-type
    utility function (low, middle and high incomes)
  • Producers perfect or imperfect competition
  • Factor market nested CES functions
  • Foreign sector small open economy assumption,
    Armington in imports, CET in exports
  • Region 7 regions (Russian federal level),
    intraregional trade in goods and services
  • Transport and trade trade involves consumption
    of transport (margins) produced by a
    representative transport and trade sector, we do
    not use the iceberg transport cost assumption

11
SUSTRUS (2)
  • Government taxation and subsidies, depending on
    available data income tax, VAT, corporate income
    tax, import tax, export subsidies, product
    tax/subsidy, etc Federal and regional level
    government
  • Investment representative investment agent with
    Cobb-Douglas utility
  • Model dynamics recursive dynamic structure with
    accumulation of capital through investment
  • Closure (s)
  • - labour supply fixed on short term, mobile
    between sectors
  • - flexible exchange rate / fixed exchange
    rate
  • - regional capital fixed on short term
  • - investment savings
  • - GDP deflator used as numeraire
  • - Government consumption / savings fixed

12
SUSTRUS structure
ENVIRONMENTAL MODULE
TRADE MODULE
SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODULE
13
Production
KLEM
KLE
MAT
KL
E
K
L
Elec
Nonelec
Coal
Petr
Gas
14
Supply
XD
Sigma T
XXD
EXP
Sigma A1
Reg1
Reg2
Reg..
EU
EROW
Eu1
Eu2
ROW1
ROW2
15
Sales
X
Sigma T
XDD
IMP
Sigma A1
Reg1
Reg2
Reg..
EU
EROW
Eu1
Eu2
ROW1
ROW2
16
Production commodities
Agriculture, ea Machinery
Fishing Electric and optics
Coal Transport Eq.
Gas Other manufacturing
Oil Electricity, gas and water (distribution)
Mining (non-energy) Electricity
Food, beverage and tobacco Construction
Textiles Wholesale trade
Leather Hotels and restaurants
Wood Communication
PulpPaper Transport
Cokes, petroleum refineries Financial intermediation
Chemicals Government service and defence
Rubber and plastics Real estate, renting and business activities
Non-metallic products Education
Basic metals Health and social work
17
Socio-economic module
  • Optional monopolistic competition of
    Dixit-Stiglitz type, based on concentration
    indices (Herfindahl index) in Guriev S. (2004)
  • Unemployment modelling via simplified wage curve
    for each skill type
  • Different household types modelled, based on
    CEFIR data on
  • Income by household type (low, middle and high
    income)
  • Source of income (capital, labour by skill type,
    transfers)
  • Consumption data by household type
  • Production sector has demand for each skill type
    ? endogenous labour price by skill
  • Labour demand by skill type is based on ILO data

18
Environmental module
  • Built in as an endogenous module within SUSTRUS,
    based on the GEM-E-3 modelling approach.
  • ZEW translated the environmental module of
    GEM-E-3 to fit within our framework
  • Emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses and
    the most important non-greenhouse gasses NOx,
    Sox, PM and VOC on regional level
  • Elements modelled
  • Emissions (combustion) by fuel type and sector
  • Abatement (end-of-pipe) by sector
  • ETS system with caps on national and regional
    level
  • Recursive dynamics within the emissions module
  • Grandfathering of emissions / hot air / other
    constraints

19
International module
  • Armington and CET functions for disaggregation of
    imports/exports by international destination
  • EU countries and RoW countries are grouped
  • Full disaggregation
  • ? Middle East, Africa, South America, North
    America, West Europe, East Europe, Scandinavia,
    Baltics, South Europe, Rest Europe, Rest Asia,
    FSU, China, Japan, Ukraine, RoW
  • FDI is treated within the recursive dynamic
    structure of the model

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Overview
  • Introducing the project
  • Model characteristics
  • Applications
  • Conclusions

24
Possible applications
ENV
ECO
Taxation redistribution Innovation
Energy Tax Emission tax Energy efficiency Abatemen
t
Trade infrastructure Trade openness Energy prices
TRADE
25
Stabilization of CO2 emissions
  • Sensitivity analysis of the SUSTRUS model to the
    introduction of a general cap on CO2 emissions
  • Introduce a cap on emissions equal to the 2006
    level
  • Run the model for 20 time periods
  • Economic growth increases the demand for emission
    permits gradually over time
  • We assume that demand for emission permits grows
    with 2 in each year
  • Test both model dynamics and environmental module

26
(No Transcript)
27
Main indicators - country
    2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Welfare Mil.Rubles (e4) -8.62 -75.04 -157.44 -281.01 -385.01
  Change -0.05 -0.30 -0.49 -0.69 -0.82
Tax Revenue Mil.Rubles (e4) 7.62 83.23 198.10 381.13 535.18
  Change 0.08 0.61 1.15 1.73 2.10
GDP Mil.Rubles (e4) -17.87 -151.52 -309.83 -538.24 -725.57
  Change -0.07 -0.43 -0.68 -0.93 -1.09
28
(No Transcript)
29
GDP regional level
GDP Region 2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Change Central -0.05 -0.26 -0.36 -0.44 -0.49
  NorthEast -0.07 -0.44 -0.70 -0.97 -1.14
  SouthWest -0.07 -0.33 -0.42 -0.45 -0.46
  Volga -0.07 -0.46 -0.78 -1.12 -1.34
  Urals -0.08 -0.64 -1.11 -1.57 -1.83
  Siberia -0.10 -0.66 -1.13 -1.62 -1.93
  FarEast -0.07 -0.43 -0.66 -0.86 -0.99
mil. Rubles (e4) Central -4.76 -32.89 -58.08 -90.70 -117.52
  NorthEast -1.80 -15.12 -31.11 -54.70 -74.33
  SouthWest -1.24 -8.39 -13.77 -18.90 -22.13
  Volga -3.01 -26.55 -56.91 -104.01 -144.37
  Urals -3.79 -39.41 -87.84 -158.16 -213.95
  Siberia -2.50 -23.16 -50.47 -92.24 -127.31
  FarEast -0.76 -6.00 -11.66 -19.53 -25.96
30
SWF-regional level
  2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Central -2.69 -22.78 -47.86 -87.13 -121.51
NorthEast -1.36 -12.16 -26.01 -46.93 -64.44
SouthWest -0.69 -5.13 -9.47 -15.04 -19.40
Volga -1.54 -13.85 -29.97 -55.00 -76.41
Urals -1.09 -10.35 -21.77 -37.27 -49.10
Siberia -0.93 -8.16 -17.18 -30.67 -41.97
FarEast -0.33 -2.61 -5.19 -8.97 -12.18
31
CO2 emission abatement
CO2 (Mtonnes) 2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Central -6 -47 -87 -134 -164
NorthEast -4 -26 -44 -64 -77
SouthWest -4 -23 -37 -52 -60
Volga -4 -32 -59 -89 -109
Urals -2 -19 -38 -60 -76
Siberia -4 -32 -56 -82 -99
FarEast -2 -11 -19 -27 -32
Total -25 -189 -341 -508 -616
32
CO2 emissions by fuel
    2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Change coal -2.35 -14.69 -23.34 -30.95 -35.11
  gas -2.12 -14.23 -23.39 -31.66 -36.22
  petrol -0.47 -3.64 -6.58 -9.73 -11.71
  total -2.00 -13.19 -21.53 -29.07 -33.24
Mtonnes coal -7.75 -54.66 -95.86 -140.33 -168.94
  gas -17.03 -128.54 -233.22 -348.62 -423.21
  petrol -0.66 -5.72 -11.43 -18.67 -23.84
  total -25.44 -188.93 -340.52 -507.63 -616.00
33
Market price by good
Price () 2007 2013 2018 2023 2026
Gas -0.85 -5.31 -8.19 -10.38 -11.41
Coal -0.26 -1.47 -2.14 -2.54 -2.67
Trade -0.05 -0.47 -0.92 -1.46 -1.81
Oil -0.03 -0.25 -0.52 -0.90 -1.18
Petrol 0.05 0.36 0.66 1.01 1.24
Basic metal 0.05 0.48 0.98 1.61 2.05
Heating 0.09 0.81 1.65 2.72 3.47
Electricity 0.55 4.53 8.71 13.71 17.15
34
Conclusions
  • Preliminary results of simulation follow economic
    intuition
  • Regions dependent on resource intensive sectors
    experience a decrease in GDP
  • Emissions from gas and coal decrease relatively
    more than petrol emissions
  • Emission permit system leads to higher energy
    efficiency
  • Market price for electricity, heating and heavy
    manufacturing increase
  • The results illustrate the relative difference
    between regional structure
  • The SUSTRUS model is sufficiently broad to handle
    not only environmental issues, but also
    socio-economic and interregional or international
    issues consistently

35
Thank youFor your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com