Title: Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education Policies
1Part 2
- Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education
Policies - Sajitha Bashir
- May 3, 2006
2Structure of the Presentation
- Why model fiscal implications of education
policy? - Structure of models
- Choice of Scenarios
- Examples DRC and Benin
- Limitations
3What will NOT be covered
- How to build a model
- Building a model is a technical exercise takes
time and care. But it is a tool which can be done
by a technician - For the PER author, what is important is to
understand how to use this tool
4Why Undertake Fiscal Modeling?
- PER analysis should reveal areas where public
resources are - not aligned with government objectives
- not used efficiently
- do not promote equity
- Government Education Plan sets out objectives and
strategies - usually without costs
5Usefulness of Fiscal Modeling in PER
- Identifies fiscal impact of measures to improve
efficiency - Can assess sustainability/feasibility of proposed
plan - Has impact on policy discussions, especially with
Ministry of Finance
6Different Modeling Approaches
- Aggregate Fiscal Discipline
- Sectoral Expenditure Envelope set by MOF (3-5
years) usually as part of MTEF - Within Sector determine priorities, objectives,
strategies (PER sectoral analysis) - Cost Strategies
- Is it consistent with resource availability?
- Iterations alternative strategies suggest
savings
- Simulation Model
- Set Sectoral Objectives and Strategies
(PER/sectoral analysis/sectoral plan) - Estimate costs
- Check macro/budget implications
- Estimate domestic resource gap compare with
external financing - Iterations come up with realistic resource gap
7Simulation Model
- Purpose
- Evaluate tradeoffs required to arrive at fiscally
sustainable and technically sound educational
strategy consistent with government objectives
for coverage, quality, equity - Method
- Develop different scenarios with varying
assumptions - Results
- Evolution of expenditures by type
- Evolution of education system (pupil numbers,
staff, schools, classes)
8Structure of Model
- Spreadsheet all quantifiable variables of
education system are linked to each other - Five categories of elements
- Base year data
- Objectives
- Assumptions about macro environment
- Policy parameters
- Results
9Simple or Complex Models?
- Model whole education sector?
- Usually desirable to see sub-sectoral trade-offs
- Level of complexity should be determined by
purpose of exercise and results of sectoral
analysis - If focus is on primary, more detailed strategies
at primary level
10Limit Number of Scenarios
- Macro Assumptions x Objectives x Policy
Parameters potentially scores of scenarios - Choose 3 5 scenarios!
- Judgment is required base selections on
PER/sectoral analysis - What are the critical decisions confronting the
government?
11Macro Assumptions
- Economic growth
- Determines public receipts, public expenditures
- Demographic growth
- Determines growth of child population entering
primary school - Usually invariant across scenarios
12Sector Objectives
- Pre-primary
- Population coverage
- Primary
- Entry and completion rates (usually 100)
- Secondary and higher
- Transition rates
- Years by which objectives are to be achieved can
also vary
13Key Policy Parameters (1)
- Internal efficiency
- Repetition and drop out rates
- Service delivery targets (access/quality)
- School availability (proximity to habitation) and
size - Teacher pay (by category of teacher)
- Pupil-teacher ratio
- Ratio of teachers to non-teaching staff
- Use of multigrade teaching
- Spending on non-salary items
- Year for attainment of target is also variable
14Key Policy Parameters (2)
- Construction
- Type of construction (community?)
- Financing
- of enrolment in private sector (residual
determines maximum for public financing) - Set public financing as ratio of domestic
resources - Household financing in public sector (by category
of expenditure and sub-sector) reasonable in
relation to household income? - External financing (by category of expenditure
and sub-sector) - realistic?
15Illustration Democratic Republic of Congo
- Challenges limited public resources high
dependence on private financing low coverage
even at primary level but rapid growth at other
levels inefficiency in public spending - Policy issues expansion of post primary levels
abolition of fees raising teacher salaries - EFA plan sets ambitious objectives and strategies
which are not costed
16DRC- Common Assumptions of Scenarios
17(No Transcript)
18DRC- Cost Saving Measures of Scenarios 3 and 4
19DRC- Impact on Education Indicators
20DRC- Expenditure Requirements (FC and 2001US )
21DRC - Preliminary Conclusions
- Universal pre-school is not feasible
- Staffing rationalization/use of multigrade
teaching yields considerable savings - Reducing transition rates in post primary
education is still required - Scenario 4 is most acceptable
- Examine relative unit costs and composition of
expenditures to further assess suitability
22Other trade-offs are possible
- Eliminate school feeding - expensive even when
targeted to 30 of pupils - What is its objective ? (increase attendance?
improve student attentiveness?) Are resources
better used elsewhere e.g., to raise teachers
salaries? - Raise pupil-teacher ratio
- Stagger construction
- Raise private financing share in higher education
(but equity trade-off)
23Benin Issues
- Primary GER 97 but high disparities between
regions, gender and social groups - Quality very low less than 10 percent of 3rd
graders could read with comprehension - Primary completion rate 46
- Repetition rate 36 in final primary grade
- Less than 2 of domestic education budget on
books and teacher training - Very rapid growth in higher education (mainly
private, but also public)
24Large Differences in Salaries of Primary Teachers
Salary per teacher in ( of per cap GDP) of total teachers
Primary teachers 1 860 (4.9) 100
Permanent 3 011 (7.9) 56.1
Contractual 750 (2.0) 19.9
Community 300 (0.8) 23.9
Francophone Africa (6.3)
Anglophone Africa (3.6)
25Distribution of schools by pupil-teacher ratio in
grade 1
26Objectives for Primary Education
Goal Target Impact
Primary completion 100 (1.76 millions pupils by 2015) Classrooms/ teachers
Quality Pupil-teacher ratio 40 Teachers
Internal efficiency Repetition rate 10 Reduces rooms/teachers
27Expenditure requirements policy trade-offs
- Number of teachers will need to double
- If only permanent teachers at current salary
levels expenditure needs will multiply by 4 - Using contractual/community teachers
expenditures will multiply by 3 - A new statute for teachers?
- Post primary transition rate will also need to be
reduced
28Major Reforms to Improve Quality Difficult to
Model
- Example Benin French as language of
instruction from class 1 may be impeding quality - Alternatives are
- use local language (18 in Benin)
- use small groups in classes 1 and 2 (teaching
aides?) - Use radio instruction to reinforce learning
- How do you model costs?
- Use some key cost drivers (eg additional
teachers teacher support additional materials)
29To Improve Efficiency of Public Spending Link
with Budgetary Processes
- Usually modeling serves analytical purpose
illustrates possible choices - Whether it is used in practice to guide policy
choices depends on institutional framework - Often difficult to link with budget preparation
- Policy parameters with greatest fiscal impact
often the most difficult to change (e.g., teacher
pay policy, ratios of teachers to administrative
staff)
30Address Public Expenditure Management and
Institutional Framework
- Who undertakes modeling in the sector?
- Are results evaluated by key policy makers?
- Are scenarios used in budget preparation? eg is
discussion within MTEF framework based on these
trade-offs? - Is the model updated regularly?
- Is there willingness to undertake this work
within the government? - If so, what are capacity building requirements?