Title: Casting Light on Dark Matter?
1Casting Light on Dark Matter?
John ELLIS, Kings College London CERN
2The Current Context
- Three major new experimental results
- The discovery of a Higgs boson _at_ LHC
- Constraints on models of dark matter
- But no evidence of dark matter particles
- Planck satellite data
- Consistent with ?CDM model
- Constraints on inflationary models
- First data from the AMS-02 experiment
- Rising positron fraction
- Astrophysics or dark matter annihilations?
3Unofficial Combination of Higgs Search Data from
March 6th
Is this the Higgs Boson?
No Higgs here!
No Higgs here!
4It Walks and Quacks like a Higgs
- Do couplings scale mass? With scale v?
- Red line SM, dashed line best fit
Global fit
JE Tevong You, arXiv1303.3879
5What else is there?
- Successful prediction for Higgs mass
- Should be lt 130 GeV in simple models
- Successful predictions for Higgs couplings
- Should be within few of SM values
- Naturalness, GUTs, string,
- Could explain the dark matter
6Lightest Sparticle as Dark Matter
- Stable in many models because of conservation of
R parity - R (-1) 2S L 3B
- where S spin, L lepton , B baryon
- Particles have R 1, sparticles R -1
- Sparticles produced in pairs
- Heavier sparticles ? lighter sparticles
- Lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) stable
- Present in Universe today as relic from Big Bang
Fayet
7Relic Density Calculation
- Freeze-out from thermal equilibrium
- Typical annihilation cross section 3 ? 10-26
cm2 - Lower if coannihilation with related particles
8Supersymmetric Signature _at_ LHC
Look for missing transverse energy carried away
by dark matter particles
9Searches 5/fb _at_ 8 TeV
Supersymmetry Searches _at_ LHC
Classic missing-energy search
Multiple searches including b, leptons
10Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
2
5
Scan of CMSSM
Impacts of searches with full 2012 data
Update of Buchmueller et al arXiv1207.3715
p-value of simple models lt 10
11Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
5
1
Gluino mass
CMSSM
Update of Buchmueller, JE et al arXiv1207.3715
Favoured values of gluino mass significantly above
pre-LHC, gt 1.5 TeV
12Cosmological Inflation in Light of Planck
- A scalar in the sky? A Wess-Zumino model?
13Inflationary Models in Light of Planck
- Planck CMB observations consistent with inflation
- Tilted scalar perturbation spectrum
- ns 0.9585 0.070
- BUT strengthen upper limit on tensor
perturbations r lt 0.10 - Challenge for simple
- inflationary models
- Starobinsky R2 to rescue?
- Supersymmetry to rescue?
Croon, JE Mavromatos arXiv1303.6253
14Higgs Inflation a Single Scalar?
Bezrukov Shaposhnikov, arXiv0710.3755
- Standard Model with non-minimal coupling to
gravity - Potential similar to Starobinsky, but not
identical
BUT needs MH gt 127 GeV ? LHC?
15Supersymmetric Inflation in Light of Planck
- Supersymmetric Wess-Zumino (WZ) model consistent
with Planck data
?4
?2
?
WZ
?2/3
Croon, JE, Mavromatos arXiv1303.6253
16No-Scale Supergravity Inflation
- The only good symmetry is a local symmetry
- Early Universe cosmology needs gravity
- Supersymmetry gravity Supergravity
- BUT potentials in generic supergravity models
have potential holes with depths MP4 - Exception no-scale supergravity
- Appears in compactifications of string
- Flat directions, scalar potential global model
controlled corrections
JE, Nanopoulos Olive, arXiv1305.1247, 1307.3537
17No-Scale Supergravity Inflation
Looks like R2 model
JE, Nanopoulos Olive, arXiv1305.1247, 1307.3537
18Strategies for Detecting Supersymmetric Dark
Matter
- Scattering on nucleus in laboratory
- ? A ? ? A
- Annihilation in core of Sun or Earth
- ? ? ? ? ? µ
- Annihilation in galactic centre, dwarf galaxies
- ? ? ? ? ?
- Annihilation in galactic halo
- ? ? ? positrons, antiprotons, ?
19Direct Searches for Dark Matter
New CDMS result
Best limit XENON100 with 225 days of
data Confusion at low WIMP masses?
Aprile et al.
20Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
5
2
Spin-independent Dark matter scattering
--- 1/fb ___ 5/fb
Excluded by XENON100
Excluded by LHC
Buchmueller, JE et al arXiv1207.3715
Favoured values of dark matter scattering cross
section significantly below XENON100
21Strategies for Detecting Supersymmetric Dark
Matter
- Scattering on nucleus in laboratory
- ? A ? ? A
- Annihilation in core of Sun or Earth
- ? ? ? ? ? µ
- Annihilation in galactic centre, dwarf galaxies
- ? ? ? ? ?
- Annihilation in galactic halo
- ? ? ? positrons, antiprotons, ?
22Neutralino Annihilation Rates
In some supersymmetric models may be much
smaller than order-of-magnitude estimate
JE, Olive Spanos, arXiv1106.0768
23Annihilation Branching Fractions
Vary in different regions of parameter space
Must be modelled correctly
JE, Olive Spanos, arXiv1106.0768
24Fermi ? line_at_ 130 GeV?
Weniger analysis claimed 4 s (3 s with
look-elsewhere effect)
- BUT Fermi Collaboration also sees bump in
control sample of ?s from Earths limb - Presumably a systematic effect
25AMS-02 on International Space Station (ISS)
26Positron Fraction Rising with E
- Dark Matter? Galactic cosmic rays? Local sources?
27Dark Matter Fit to AMS Positron Data
- Can find good fit ?2 18 with annihilation to
tt- by modifying cosmic ray parameters
JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
28Dark Matter Fit to AMS Positron Data
- BUT very large annihilation cross section
- 3 ? 10-23 cm2 gtgt required for relic density
- OR very large boost from halo density
fluctuation(s)
JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
29Galactic Cosmic Rays Alone?
Blum, Katz Waxman, arXiv1305.1324
- Rising positron fraction compatible with
model-independent bound on secondary e
30Galactic Cosmic Rays Alone?
- Can fit positron data with modified cosmic-ray
model - BUT problems with e-, p
_
JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
31Assume Local Source Constrain any extra Dark
Matter Contribution
- Dark Matter annihilation could give feature above
otherwise smooth distribution
Bergstrom et al, arXiv1306.3983
32The LHC may cast light on dark matter
dark matter experiments may cast light
on fundamental questions in particle physics