Casting Light on Dark Matter? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Casting Light on Dark Matter?

Description:

Annihilation in galactic halo positrons, antiprotons, ? Best limit: XENON100 with 225 days of data Confusion at low WIMP masses? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: cern96
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Casting Light on Dark Matter?


1
Casting Light on Dark Matter?
John ELLIS, Kings College London CERN
2
The Current Context
  • Three major new experimental results
  • The discovery of a Higgs boson _at_ LHC
  • Constraints on models of dark matter
  • But no evidence of dark matter particles
  • Planck satellite data
  • Consistent with ?CDM model
  • Constraints on inflationary models
  • First data from the AMS-02 experiment
  • Rising positron fraction
  • Astrophysics or dark matter annihilations?

3
Unofficial Combination of Higgs Search Data from
March 6th

Is this the Higgs Boson?
No Higgs here!
No Higgs here!
4
It Walks and Quacks like a Higgs
  • Do couplings scale mass? With scale v?
  • Red line SM, dashed line best fit

Global fit
JE Tevong You, arXiv1303.3879
5
What else is there?
  • Supersymmetry
  • Successful prediction for Higgs mass
  • Should be lt 130 GeV in simple models
  • Successful predictions for Higgs couplings
  • Should be within few of SM values
  • Naturalness, GUTs, string,
  • Could explain the dark matter

6
Lightest Sparticle as Dark Matter
  • Stable in many models because of conservation of
    R parity
  • R (-1) 2S L 3B
  • where S spin, L lepton , B baryon
  • Particles have R 1, sparticles R -1
  • Sparticles produced in pairs
  • Heavier sparticles ? lighter sparticles
  • Lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) stable
  • Present in Universe today as relic from Big Bang

Fayet
7
Relic Density Calculation
  • Freeze-out from thermal equilibrium
  • Typical annihilation cross section 3 ? 10-26
    cm2
  • Lower if coannihilation with related particles

8
Supersymmetric Signature _at_ LHC
Look for missing transverse energy carried away
by dark matter particles
9
Searches 5/fb _at_ 8 TeV
Supersymmetry Searches _at_ LHC
Classic missing-energy search
Multiple searches including b, leptons
10
Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
2
5

Scan of CMSSM
Impacts of searches with full 2012 data
Update of Buchmueller et al arXiv1207.3715
p-value of simple models lt 10
11
Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
5
1
Gluino mass
CMSSM
Update of Buchmueller, JE et al arXiv1207.3715
Favoured values of gluino mass significantly above
pre-LHC, gt 1.5 TeV
12
Cosmological Inflation in Light of Planck
  • A scalar in the sky? A Wess-Zumino model?

13
Inflationary Models in Light of Planck
  • Planck CMB observations consistent with inflation
  • Tilted scalar perturbation spectrum
  • ns 0.9585 0.070
  • BUT strengthen upper limit on tensor
    perturbations r lt 0.10
  • Challenge for simple
  • inflationary models
  • Starobinsky R2 to rescue?
  • Supersymmetry to rescue?

Croon, JE Mavromatos arXiv1303.6253
14
Higgs Inflation a Single Scalar?
Bezrukov Shaposhnikov, arXiv0710.3755
  • Standard Model with non-minimal coupling to
    gravity
  • Potential similar to Starobinsky, but not
    identical

BUT needs MH gt 127 GeV ? LHC?
15
Supersymmetric Inflation in Light of Planck
  • Supersymmetric Wess-Zumino (WZ) model consistent
    with Planck data

?4
?2
?
WZ
?2/3
Croon, JE, Mavromatos arXiv1303.6253
16
No-Scale Supergravity Inflation
  • The only good symmetry is a local symmetry
  • Early Universe cosmology needs gravity
  • Supersymmetry gravity Supergravity
  • BUT potentials in generic supergravity models
    have potential holes with depths MP4
  • Exception no-scale supergravity
  • Appears in compactifications of string
  • Flat directions, scalar potential global model
    controlled corrections

JE, Nanopoulos Olive, arXiv1305.1247, 1307.3537
17
No-Scale Supergravity Inflation
  • Good inflation for

Looks like R2 model
JE, Nanopoulos Olive, arXiv1305.1247, 1307.3537
18
Strategies for Detecting Supersymmetric Dark
Matter
  • Scattering on nucleus in laboratory
  • ? A ? ? A
  • Annihilation in core of Sun or Earth
  • ? ? ? ? ? µ
  • Annihilation in galactic centre, dwarf galaxies
  • ? ? ? ? ?
  • Annihilation in galactic halo
  • ? ? ? positrons, antiprotons, ?

19
Direct Searches for Dark Matter
New CDMS result
Best limit XENON100 with 225 days of
data Confusion at low WIMP masses?
Aprile et al.
20
Global Fit to Supersymmetric Model
5
2
Spin-independent Dark matter scattering
--- 1/fb ___ 5/fb
Excluded by XENON100
Excluded by LHC
Buchmueller, JE et al arXiv1207.3715
Favoured values of dark matter scattering cross
section significantly below XENON100
21
Strategies for Detecting Supersymmetric Dark
Matter
  • Scattering on nucleus in laboratory
  • ? A ? ? A
  • Annihilation in core of Sun or Earth
  • ? ? ? ? ? µ
  • Annihilation in galactic centre, dwarf galaxies
  • ? ? ? ? ?
  • Annihilation in galactic halo
  • ? ? ? positrons, antiprotons, ?

22
Neutralino Annihilation Rates
In some supersymmetric models may be much
smaller than order-of-magnitude estimate
JE, Olive Spanos, arXiv1106.0768
23
Annihilation Branching Fractions
Vary in different regions of parameter space
Must be modelled correctly
JE, Olive Spanos, arXiv1106.0768
24
Fermi ? line_at_ 130 GeV?
Weniger analysis claimed 4 s (3 s with
look-elsewhere effect)
  • BUT Fermi Collaboration also sees bump in
    control sample of ?s from Earths limb
  • Presumably a systematic effect

25
AMS-02 on International Space Station (ISS)
26
Positron Fraction Rising with E
  • Dark Matter? Galactic cosmic rays? Local sources?

27
Dark Matter Fit to AMS Positron Data
  • Can find good fit ?2 18 with annihilation to
    tt- by modifying cosmic ray parameters

JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
28
Dark Matter Fit to AMS Positron Data
  • BUT very large annihilation cross section
  • 3 ? 10-23 cm2 gtgt required for relic density
  • OR very large boost from halo density
    fluctuation(s)

JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
29
Galactic Cosmic Rays Alone?
Blum, Katz Waxman, arXiv1305.1324
  • Rising positron fraction compatible with
    model-independent bound on secondary e

30
Galactic Cosmic Rays Alone?
  • Can fit positron data with modified cosmic-ray
    model
  • BUT problems with e-, p

_
JE, Olive Spanos, in preparation
31
Assume Local Source Constrain any extra Dark
Matter Contribution
  • Dark Matter annihilation could give feature above
    otherwise smooth distribution

Bergstrom et al, arXiv1306.3983
32
The LHC may cast light on dark matter
dark matter experiments may cast light
on fundamental questions in particle physics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com