MANE 4240 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

MANE 4240

Description:

MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Prof. Suvranu De Numerical Integration in 1D MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Numerical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Suvra1
Category:
Tags: mane | integral

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MANE 4240


1
MANE 4240 CIVL 4240Introduction to Finite
Elements
Prof. Suvranu De
  • Numerical Integration in 1D

2
Reading assignment Lecture notes, Logan 10.4
  • Summary
  • Newton-Cotes Integration Schemes
  • Gaussian quadrature

3
Axially loaded elastic bar
A(x) cross section at x b(x) body force
distribution (force per unit length) E(x)
Youngs modulus
x2
x1
For each element
Element stiffness matrix
where
4
Only for a linear finite element
Element nodal load vector
Question How do we compute these integrals using
a computer?
5
Any integral from x1 to x2 can be transformed to
the following integral on (-1, 1)
Use the following change of variables
Goal Obtain a good approximate value of this
integral 1. Newton-Cotes Schemes (trapezoidal
rule, Simpsons rule, etc) 2. Gauss Integration
Schemes NOTE Integration schemes in 1D are
referred to as quadrature rules
6
Trapezoidal rule Approximate the function f(x)
by a straight line g(x) that passes through the
end points and integrate the straight line
7
  • Requires the function f(x) to be evaluated at 2
    points (-1, 1)
  • Constants and linear functions are exactly
    integrated
  • Not good for quadratic and higher order
    polynomials
  • How can I make this better?

8
Simpsons rule Approximate the function f(x) by
a parabola g(x) that passes through the end
points and through f(0) and integrate the parabola
9
  • Requires the function f(x) to be evaluated at 3
    points (-1,0, 1)
  • Constants, linear functions and parabolas are
    exactly integrated
  • Not good for cubic and higher order polynomials

How to generalize this formula?
10
Notice that both the integration formulas had the
general form
Trapezoidal rule M2
Accurate for polynomial of degree at most 1 (M-1)
Simpsons rule M3
Accurate for polynomial of degree at most 2 (M-1)
11
Generalization of these two integration rules
Newton-Cotes
  • Divide the interval (-1,1) into M-1 equal
    intervals using M points
  • Pass a polynomial of degree M-1 through these M
    points (the value of this polynomial will be
    equal to the value of the function at these M-1
    points)
  • Integrate this polynomial to obtain an
    approximate value of the integral

f(1)
f(x)
f(-1)
g(x)
x
-1
1
12
With M points we may integrate a polynomial of
degree M-1 exactly. Is this the best we can do
? With M integration points and M weights, I
should be able to integrate a polynomial of
degree 2M-1 exactly!! Gauss integration rule
See table 10-1 (p 405) of Logan
13
Gauss quadrature
How can we choose the integration points and
weights to exactly integrate a polynomial of
degree 2M-1? Remember that now we do not know, a
priori, the location of the integration points.
14
Example M1 (Midpoint qudrature)
How can we choose W1 and x1 so that we may
integrate a (2M-11) linear polynomial exactly?
But we want
15
Hence, we obtain the identity
For this to hold for arbitrary a0 and a1 we need
to satisfy 2 conditions
i.e.,
16
For M1
f(x)
f(0)
g(x)
x
-1
1
  • Midpoint quadrature rule
  • Only one evaluation of f(x) is required at the
    midpoint of the interval.
  • Scheme is accurate for constants and linear
    polynomials (compare with Trapezoidal rule)

17
Example M2
How can we choose W1 ,W2 x1 and x2 so that we may
integrate a polynomial of degree (2M-14-13)
exactly?
But we want
18
Hence, we obtain the 4 conditions to determine
the 4 unknowns (W1 ,W2 x1 and x2 )
Check that the following is the solution
19
For M2
f(x)
x


-1
1
  • Only two evaluations of f(x) is required.
  • Scheme is accurate for polynomials of degree at
    most 3 (compare with Simpsons rule)

20
Exercise Derive the 6 conditions required to
find the integration points and weights for a
3-point Gauss quadrature rule
Newton-Cotes
Gauss quadrature
1. M integration points are necessary to
exactly integrate a polynomial of degree 2M-1
2. Less expensive 3. Exponential convergence,
error proportional to
1. M integration points are necessary to
exactly integrate a polynomial of degree M-1
2. More expensive
21
Example
Exact integration
Integrate and check!
Newton-Cotes
To exactly integrate this I need a 4-point
Newton-Cotes formula. Why?
Gauss
To exactly integrate this I need a 2-point Gauss
formula. Why?
22
Gauss quadrature
Exact answer!
23
Comparison of Gauss quadrature and Newton-Cotes
for the integral
Newton-Cotes
Gauss quadrature
24
In FEM we ALWAYS use Gauss quadrature
Linear Element
Stiffness matrix
Nodal load vector
Usually a 2-point Gauss integration is used. Note
that if A, E and b are complex functions of x,
they will not be accurately integrated
25
Quadratic Element
2
Nodal shape functions
You should be able to derive these!
Stiffness matrix
Assuming E and A are constants
26
Need to exactly integrate quadratic terms. Hence
we need a 2-point Gauss quadrature scheme..Why?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com