Title: Intelligence: Theories
1Intelligence Theories
- EDU 330 Educational Psychology
- Daniel Moos
2Intelligence Introduction (I)
What comes to mind when you hear diversity?
3Intelligence Introduction (II)
- How is intelligence studied?
- Factor Analysis
- Statistical analysis used to measure a latent
variable (i.e. cant directly measure the
variable) - Results identify underlying manifest variables
(i.e. variables that can be directly measured)
4Intelligence Introduction (III)
- Example of Factor Analysis How is athletic
ability measured at NHL tryouts?
Athletic Ability
Strength
Speed
Agility
5Intelligence Factor Models (I)
- Charles Spearman (1927)
- Two factors
- g factor ? domain-general and homogeneous (i.e.
intellectual functioning relatively homogenous
across a number of different tasks) - Specific factor ? Specific factors that are
pertinent to specific task (butg factor is what
most interested Spearman)
g factor
6GARDNERS THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE
Dimension Description
Example
Linguistic
Ability to use language
Logical
Reasoning, numbers, symbols
Musical
Sensitivity to pitch, tone
perceive the visual-spatial world accurately
Spatial
Kinesthetic
Ability to use body coordinated movements
Interpersonal
Understanding of social interactions
Intrapersonal
Understanding of self
Naturalistic
Recognize similarities/diff in physical world
7GARDNERS THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE
Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish
by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its
whole life believing that it is stupid. (Albert
Einstein)
8GARDNERS THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE, APPLICATION TO
REAL-LIFE CONTEXT
Linguistic
Ability to use language
Identify THREE specific examples of how you might
address different intelligences within your
class? In other words, how might you design
activities/lessons, etc to meet the needs of
students with diverse set of intelligences?
Logical
Reasoning, numbers, symbols
Musical
Sensitivity to pitch, tone
Spatial
Perceive words accurately
Kinesthetic
Ability to use body coordinated movements
Interpersonal
Understanding of social interactions
Intrapersonal
Understanding of self
Naturalistic
Recognize similarities/diff in physical world
9STERNBERGS TRIARCHIC THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE
Intelligence
Analytical (componential)
Creative (experiential)
Practical (contextual)
Prior knowledge For solving problems, learn new
information, making judgments, evaluating,
problem solving
Novelty problems Unique situations Automation Ap
ply learned material to novel situation
Adaptation Adapt to environment Shaping Change
environment Selection Select new environment
10Intelligence Thought Question
- Parents at an elementary school back-to-school
night want to know why their child is not ability
grouped in every content area. They feel that
their child is being held back. How would you
answer their question? - On separate (but possibly related to note), to
what extent do you believe intelligence is
nature or nurture? - (1 Nature 10 Nurture)
11Intelligence Nature or Nurture?
- Foster parent-child .20
- ? The relationship between intelligence scores
for a child and foster parent is mildly positive - Parent-child .50
- Siblings reared together .49
- Fraternal twins (two eggs) .53
- Identical twins (one egg splitting) reared apart
.75 - Identical twins reared together .87
- Note Data from 1963
12Intelligence IQ Tests (I)
- Mental Age Represents number passed by average
child of same age - Example If a child passed a number of items
equal to the number passed by the average 15-year
old, that child would have a mental age of 15
(regardless of the childs chronological age) - Intelligence Quotient
- (mental age chronological age) x 100
- Example A 10 year-old with a mental age of 10
- (10/10) x 100 100
- Example A 21 year-old with a mental age of 21
- (21/21) x 100 100
- Example A 10 year-old with a mental age of 9
- (9/10) x 100 90
- Example A 10 year-old with a mental age of 11
- (11/10) x 100 110
13Intelligence IQ Tests (II)
- Issues with IQ Tests
- Does mental age intelligence?
- Example 7-year old and 10-year old have same
mental age comparable intelligence? - Example Two children with IQ of 120
- 5 year-old (mental age of 6)
- 10 year-old (mental age of 12)
- IQ tests are standardized
- May not accurately measure intelligence among
minority children, ELL (test administration may
bias results)
14Intelligence Ability grouping (I)
- Ability grouping Placing students of similar
abilities into groups, and attempting to match
instruction to needs of the groups (Lou, Abrami,
Spence, 2000) - Elementary
- Between-class grouping Divides students at a
certain grade into levels (e.g., high, average,
low) - Within-class grouping Divides students in a
class into subgroups based on reading or math
scores - Joplin plan Regroups across grade levels
- MS, HS
- Tracking Places students in different classes or
curricula on basis of achievement
15Intelligence Ability grouping (II)
- What are some pros and cons of ability
grouping/tracking? - Pros Teachers can adjust methods, instructional
pace and materials to better meet needs of
learner - Cons Logistical problems, improper placement,
stigmatization, negative effects of homogeneous
groups (as opposed to heterogeneous groups)
16Intelligence Socioeconomic status (I)
- Socioeconomic status (SES) Combination of
parents income, occupation, and level of
education that describes relative standing in
society - Powerful predictor in student achievement,
particularly test scores, grades, suspension
rate, and dropout rates (Macionis, 2006) - Why do think that SES is such a powerful
predictor?
17Intelligence Socioeconomic status (II)
- SES influences learning in at 3 ways
- Note The below describes group differences
individuals within a group vary widely
High SES (gt160,000) Low SES (lt25,000)
Basic needs experiences Well nourished, stable homes -Access to ed. activities outside home -Sometimes lack proper nourishment -Homelessness, lack access to learning experiences outside of school
Parental involvement -Highly involved, involvement in extracurricular activities -Low involvement in extracurricular activities
Attitudes values -Parents value/emphasize autonomy -High expectations -Parents value conformity -Lower expectations