GETTING STARTED ON COURSE REDESIGN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

GETTING STARTED ON COURSE REDESIGN

Description:

Title: ENHANCING ACADEMIC (LEARNING) PRODUCTIVITY Author: USer Last modified by: Patti's Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: thencatOr5
Learn more at: https://www.thencat.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GETTING STARTED ON COURSE REDESIGN


1
GETTING STARTED ON COURSE REDESIGN
2
TODAYS DISCUSSION
  • Introduction to Course Redesign
  • Proven Model for Successful Redesign
    Developmental Math at the Northern Virginia
    Community College by Teresa Overton
  • Examples from 4-year colleges
  • Discussion of Potential Obstacles
  • Available Resources

3
  • Established in 1999 as a university Center at
    RPI funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Became an independent non-profit organization in
    2003
  • Mission help colleges and universities learn how
    to use technology to improve student learning
    outcomes and reduce their instructional costs

4
WHAT DOES NCAT MEAN BY COURSE REDESIGN?
  • Course redesign is the process of redesigning
    whole courses (rather than individual classes or
    sections) to achieve better learning outcomes at
    a lower cost by taking advantage of the
    capabilities of information technology.

5
WHY REDESIGN?
  • Look for courses where redesign will have a high
    impact lets make a difference
  • Improving Student learning
  • High withdrawal/failure rates
  • Inconsistency of preparation
  • Difficulty in subsequent courses
  • Reducing Instructional Costs
  • Students on waiting lists
  • Students turned away graduation bottleneck
  • Over enrollment of courses leading to multiple
    majors
  • Difficulty getting qualified adjuncts

6
TEAM EFFORT IS KEY
  • Each team included
  • Administrator
  • Faculty experts
  • Technology expertise
  • Assessment assistance

7
250 REDESIGNED COURSES
  • 250,000 students nationwide annually
  • Improved student learning 72 Equivalent student
    learning 28
  • Cost reduction 34 (5 to 81)
  • Other outcomes
  • Increased course-completion rates
  • Improved retention
  • Better student attitudes toward the subject
  • Increased student satisfaction with the mode of
    instruction

8
NCAT METHODOLOGYRelevance and Utility
  • Discipline math literature
  • Age traditional working adults
  • Institution small large
  • Location on-campus at a distance
  • Redesign current new courses
  • Level introductory advanced

9
REDESIGN MODELS
  • Supplemental Add to the current structure
    and/or change the content
  • Replacement Blend face-to-face with online
  • activities
  • Emporium Move all classes to a lab setting
  • Fully online Conduct all (most)
  • learning activities online
  • Buffet Mix and match according
  • to student preferences
  • Linked Workshop JIT workshops
  • linked to college level course

10
REDESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
  • Redesign the whole coursenot just a single class
  • Emphasize active learninggreater student
    engagement with the material and with one another
  • Rely heavily on readily available interactive
    softwareused independently and in teams
  • Mastery learningnot self-paced
  • Increase on-demand, individualized assistance
  • Automate only those course components that can
    benefit from automatione.g., homework, quizzes,
    exams
  • Replace single mode instruction with
    differentiated personnel strategies

Technology enables good pedagogy with large s of
students.
11
SUPPLEMENTAL MODEL
  • Maintain the basic current structure
  • Change the content so that more is available on
    line
  • Change interaction so that students are
    interacting more with the material
  • Change the use of the time to reduce or eliminate
    lecturing and increase student interaction

12
REPLACEMENT MODEL
  • Blend face-to-face with online activities
  • Determine exactly what activities required
    face-to-face and reduce the amount of time to
    focus only on those activities in class
  • Provide 24/7 online interactive learning
    materials and resources
  • Include online self-assessment activities with
    immediate feedback

13
EMPORIUM MODEL
  • Move all classes to a lab setting
  • Permit the use of multiple kinds of personnel
  • Allow students to work as long as they need to
    master the content
  • Can be adapted for the kinds of students at a
    particular institution
  • Allow multiple courses the same time
  • Include multiple examples in math

14
FULLY ONLINE MODEL
  • Moves all or most of the learning environment
    online
  • Provides access to anyone, anywhere, anytime on
    demand
  • Allows international groups of students to
    interact easily and learn from
    each other

15
BUFFET MODEL
  • Assess each students knowledge/skill level and
    preferred learning style
  • Provide an array of high-quality, interactive
    learning materials and activities
  • Develop individualized study plans
  • Built in continuous assessment to provide
    instantaneous feedback
  • Offer appropriate, varied
  • human interaction
  • when needed

16
LINKED WORKSHOP MODEL
  • Retain basic structure of the college-level
    course, particularly the number of class meetings
  • Replace remedial/developmental course with
    just-in-time (JIT) workshops
  • Design workshops to remove deficiencies in core
    course competencies
  • Workshops consist of computer-based instruction,
    small-group activities and test reviews to
    provide additional instruction on key concepts
  • Students individually assigned software modules
    based on results of diagnostic assessments
  • Workshops facilitated by students who have
    previously excelled in core course students
    trained and supervised by core course faculty
  • JIT workshop activities designed so students use
    concepts during next core course class session,
    which in turn helps them see the value of the
    workshops and motivates them to do workshop
    activities

17
QUESTIONS?
18
REDESIGNINGDEVELOPMENTAL MATH
  • Teresa Overton
  • Northern Virginia Community College

19
QUESTIONS?
20
EXAMPLES FROM FOUR-YEAR INSTITUTIONS
  • University of Massachusetts Biology
  • University of Alabama Introductory Spanish
  • Arizona State University Computer Literacy

21
BIOLOGYUniversity of Massachusetts
  • CHALLENGES
  • Inconsistent student preparation
  • Poor class attendance
  • Lectures that repeated the contents of the
    textbook
  • High dissatisfaction with course by both faculty
    and students

22
BIOLOGYUniversity of Massachusetts
  • Continue to have large class meetings
  • Require short pre-tests before the start of the
    first class each week and these are available for
    the entire term as review
  • Receive small number of points for taking the
    online quiz
  • Provide 24/7 online study materials
  • Include small group interactions during class
    focused on applied biology problems
  • Class periods are now used to discuss biology
    problems, rather than lecture

23
BIOLOGYUniversity of Massachusetts
  • Student Outcomes
  • In spite of more difficult questions, scores on
    exams in the redesigned course averaged 73 vs.
    61 in the traditional course.
  • 23 of the exam questions in the traditional
    model required reasoning or problem solving
    skills vs. 67 in the redesigned course.
  • Attendance averaged 89.9 in the redesigned
    course vs. 67 in the traditional course.

24
INTRODUCTORY SPANISHUniversity of Alabama
  • Traditional Courses
  • Redesigned Courses
  • 3 5-credit-hour courses
  • Reduce 1 face-to-face class meeting with
    instructor
  • Online quizzes, vocabulary grammar exercises
    automatically graded
  • 33 enrollment increase
  • GTAs teach 4 sections instead of 3 per year for
    same time commitment
  • 3 5-credit-hour courses
  • All face-to-face class meetings with instructor
  • Taught primarily by GTAs
  • Paper textbook
  • Increasing demand with no way to accommodate more
    students

25
INTRODUCTORY SPANISHUniversity of Alabama
  • OUTCOMES
  • Traditional sections had an average final exam
    score of 65.5 in Spanish I.
  • Immediately after the initial redesign in 2005,
    there was no difference, although costs were
    reduced by 25.
  • In spring 2009, the final exam score average in
    the fully redesigned course was 80,
    demonstrating both sustainability and continued
    improvement.
  • Cost reduction of 245 to 183 per student

26
COMPUTER LITERACY Arizona State University
  • Redesign
  • 1 optional lecture per week
  • All content online assignments, quizzes and
    projects submitted via the Web
  • Scheduled guidance in lab and online staffed by
    ULAs
  • 65 received C or better in more difficult course
  • 35 cost-per-student
  • Traditional
  • 2 lectures per week
  • Paper-based assignments and multiple-choice exams
  • Open lab hours staffed by TAs and graders
  • 26 received C or better
  • 50 cost-per-student


27
EMPORIUM MODEL
  • Also being used at
  • LSU
  • Mississippi State University
  • Oklahoma State University
  • University of Alabama
  • University of Central Florida
  • University of Idaho
  • University of Nebraska - Omaha
  • University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
  • to name a few.

28
QUESTIONS?
29
MAJOR OBSTACLES TO GETTING STARTED ON COURSE
REDESIGN
30
POSSIBLE OBSTACLES
  • Willingness to Change
  • Faculty willingness to implement the redesigned
    course consistently and collaboratively
  • Departmental willingness to change
  • Student willingness and readiness to use
    technology-mediated materials and pedagogies
  • Institutional Support
  • Resources for the Redesign
  • Availability of needed facilities and technology
  • Faculty readiness to use technology-mediated
    materials and pedagogies

31
A STREAMLINED REDESIGN METHODOLOGYA Menu of
Redesign Options
  • Six Models for Course Redesign
  • Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign
  • Cost Reduction Strategies
  • Course Planning Tool
  • Course Structure Form
  • Four Models for Assessing Student Learning
  • Five Critical Implementation Issues
  • Planning Checklist

32
GUIDES TO REDESIGN
  • NCAT Guide 1 How to Redesign a Developmental
    Math Program Using the Emporium Model
  • NCAT Guide 2 How to Redesign a College-Level
    or Developmental Math Course Using the Emporium
    Model
  • See http//www.thencat.org/RedMathematics.htm
  • More Guides to Come Watch www.theNCAT.org

33
NCAT CONSULTING
  • NCAT Redesign Scholars
  • For specific disciplines
  • Over 50 experienced colleagues with their bios
  • http//www.thencat.org/RedesignAlliance/ScholarsPr
    ogram.htm
  • Dr. Carolyn Jarmon
  • For overall consulting on a new course redesign
    program or other redesign efforts
  • cjarmon_at_thenNCAT.org

34
What To Do Next?
  • Identify the problem you are trying to solve and
    collect data to support the situation
  • Establish a team and inform others of the
    redesign
  • Review other redesigns on the NCAT website in
    your academic field and the models you are
    considering
  • Review the NCAT Guide for your academic area
  • Visit other institutions who have done a redesign
  • Review resources available for the redesign
  • Establish your plan

35
GETTING STARTED ON COURSE REDESIGN
  • Teresa Overton
  • Coordinator of Developmental MathematicsAssistant
    Professor of Mathematics
  • Northern Virginia Community Collegetoverton_at_nvcc.
    edu
  • Dr. Carolyn Jarmon
  • Vice President
  • National Center for Academic Transformation
  • cjarmon_at_theNCAT.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com