Group A Membership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Group A Membership

Description:

Group A Membership Erv Blythe (Virginia Tech) Javad Boroumand (Cisco) Steve Corbat (Internet2) Wendy Huntoon (Pittsburgh SC, chair) Ron Johnson (Washington) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: GregoryA5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group A Membership


1
Group A Membership
  • Erv Blythe (Virginia Tech)
  • Javad Boroumand (Cisco)
  • Steve Corbató (Internet2)
  • Wendy Huntoon (Pittsburgh SC, chair)
  • Ron Johnson (Washington)
  • Michael Krugman (Boston University)
  • Rick Summerhill (Internet2)
  • Doug Van Houweling (Internet2)

2
Charge
  • Analyze NLR, Internet2, RON service plans
  • Identify technical and operational requirements
    and overlap
  • Identify areas where current or planned
    infrastructure falls short of requirements
  • Propose changes that would close the gap and
    enable convergence

3
Potential Services Capabilities
4
Group B Membership
  • Javad Boroumand (Cisco)
  • Bill Decker (Iowa)
  • Dave Farber (Carnegie-Mellon)
  • Tracy Futhey (Duke)
  • Ron Hutchins (Georgia Tech)
  • Greg Jackson (Chicago, chair)
  • Ron Johnson (Washington)
  • Larry Landweber (Wisconsin)
  • Jack McCredie (Berkeley)
  • Doug Van Houweling (Internet2)
  • Tom West (National LambdaRail)

5
Charge (part 3)
  • Propose one or more aggregation schemes that
    group the activities effectively
  • Schemes may correspond to the current Internet2,
    NLR, and RONs, but this is neither a requirement
    nor a goal
  • Each scheme should satisfy the diverse
    organizational requirements while minimizing
    overall complexity

6
Issues
  • Mission
  • Organization
  • Resources
  • Coherence and comprehensibility
  • Researcher relationships

7
Differentiating Dimensions
  • Membership
  • Governance
  • Network Services
  • Finances
  • Partnerships
  • Research
  • Other Activities
  • Culture

8
Status Quo (per Group A)
9
Allocation
10
Procreation
11
Integration
12
Antelope Freeway, ½ Mile
  • Report, mid-June
  • recommendations, if consensus
  • Board Council discussions, summer
  • joint?
  • Implementation, fall

13
The Bottom Line
  • Both Internet2 and NLR have evolved to meet real
    present and future requirements of the research
    and education advanced networking community
  • We must and will collaborate to respond to those
    requirements in an effective and organizationally
    efficient fashion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com