Built Environment Solutions That Meet Goals For Sustainability Outcomes PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Built Environment Solutions That Meet Goals For Sustainability Outcomes


1
Built Environment Solutions That Meet Goals For
Sustainability Outcomes
  • Mike OConnell and Chris Kane
  • BRANZ Ltd
  • Presentation to
  • International Conference on Sustainability
    Engineering and Science
  • 8th July 2004

2
Overview
  • Climate change and buildings
  • Sustainable design and construction
  • Strategies for climate change
  • Barriers and challenges
  • Opportunities and benefits
  • NOW Home

3
Building for survival or disaster?
  • to make no demands on nature that nature cannot
    continue to answer, and to refrain from
    squandering the limited resources whether of
    material (or) biological capital, on which all
    future generations, as well as ourselves, depend
    for survival
  • 1972 - Alex Gordon, RIBA Annual Conference, UK

4
Climate change impacts
Flooding - Lower N Island 2004
Hailstorm (Sydney)
5
Business as usual?
6
Orsustainable construction?
  • Sustainable construction is the set of processes
    by which the building and construction industry
    operates and delivers built assets to meet the
    aims of sustainable development
  • 2004 Rachel Hargreaves, Green Payback
  • Whats required to reduce carbon?
  • Technology exists for 80-90 less CO2
  • but constraints!

7
Strategies/approaches to reducing urban carbon
  • Preferred Policy Package
  • NEECS
  • Adaptation (NZ Climate Change Office, BRANZ
    guidance)
  • Kyoto Protocol dependent policies
  • Built environment policy (Construction Industry
    Council)
  • Urban Design Protocol (MfE)
  • Building Bill, NZ building code
  • Sustainability inclusions
  • Education - e.g. The Green Payback (BRANZ)
  • Voluntary initiatives e.g. NOW Home, BEACON
    Pathway

8
Challenges
  • Unsustainable status of existing building stock
  • Key constraints
  • Consumer attitude
  • Lifestyle choice - avg. home 195 m2!
  • Business As Usual, silo thinking
  • Decreasing industry skill base
  • Lack of awareness, information dissemination
  • Slow uptake of renewables
  • Energy demand vs. supply

9
Constraint e.g. silo thinking
  • required collaboration with the client, his
    professional and technical advisors, and the
    building team undertaking to integrate design
    factors for which they are normally separately
    responsible. Decision thus becomes a concurrent
    and not a sequential process
  • (Shepard 1971, cited in Cole 2004)

10
Opportunities
  • Sustainable buildings in practice
  • New/retrofitted 3-10 fold less energy use
  • Proven financial benefits for low-carbon
    buildings (Kats et al 2003)
  • 2 investment in green features
  • ?life cycle savings of 20 of construction costs
  • but can this translate to NZ?!
  • What action can we take in NZ?
  • Warm Home Energy Rating Schemes
  • EBEX21/CarboNZero

11
Ancient sustainability!
Barat, Yemen
12
Sustainable buildings - international
Passiv Haus, Austria
Condé-Nast, 4 Times Square, NY
BedZED, UK
13
Sustainable buildings - NZ
ZALEH, Wanaka
Paraparaumu library (image courtesy Warren
Mahoney)
Strawbale house, Canterbury
14
Benefits and co-benefits
  • Benefits
  • Reduced resource consumption, waste, etc
  • Lower business/household operational costs
  • Environment Canterbury EOC energy savings
  • Improved employee productivity, personal
    well-being
  • ING Bank, Amsterdam 15 less absenteeism
  • Co-benefits
  • Synergies with adaptation (natural
    cooling/warming)
  • Improved local air quality warmer houses vs.
    cleaner emissions, ? reduced PM10, etc
  • Health improved building envelope

15
Typical Kiwi Home
Built for the view, not for the sun!
  • Our home aspirations
  • privacy, security, etc
  • warm/cosy in winter, cool/open in summer
  • the dreamaffordability!

16
The NOW Home
Built for the sun, not the property lines!
  • Prototype NOW Home - Waitakere City
  • Construction consortium (includes BRANZ)
  • Design principles incorporated from start
  • Practice to make a difference
  • First stage of more involved project (BEACON
    Pathway)
  • Exemplary voluntary initiative in absence of
    tougher NZBC

17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com