Critical Listening - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical Listening

Description:

Critical Listening Does what the other person says make sense? Conversational Apologetics Open Questions To understand and know them Pointed Questions To remove the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:203
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: homm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical Listening


1
Critical Listening
  • Does what the other person says make sense?

2
Conversational Apologetics
  • Open Questions
  • To understand and know them
  • Pointed Questions
  • To remove the roof of their irrational
    assumptions
  • Explain the Gospel
  • Only when asked
  • Nurture The Relationship
  • Help unbelievers grow towards Christ
  • Help believers to grow IN Christ

3
Critical Listening
  • Logical Fallacies
  • Listen for something that doesnt make sense
  • Familiarize yourself with the most common Logical
    Fallacies and begin to listen for them theyre
    everywhere!
  • Two Common Fallacies
  • Appeals to Motives in place of Support
  • Changing the Subject

4
Motives in Place of Support
  • Appeal to Force the reader is persuaded to agree
    by force
  • Example You had better agree that Gay Marriage
    is OK, or well tell everyone youre gay!
  • Pointed Question How does lying about me prove
    that Gay Marriage is OK?

5
Motives in Place of Support
  • Appeal to Pity the reader is persuaded to agree
    by sympathy
  • Example Gays should be able to marry whomever
    they want they are the most discriminated-against
    minority in the world!
  • Pointed Question How does the fact that Gays
    may be discriminated against prove that same-sex
    marriage is OK?

6
Motives in Place of Support
  • Consequences the reader is warned of
    unacceptable consequences
  • Example You cant agree that Intelligent Design
    is true, because if it is, all of science will be
    undermined.
  • Pointed Question Even if all of science would
    be undermined, how does that disprove Intelligent
    Design?

7
Motives in Place of Support
  • Prejudicial Language value or moral goodness is
    attached to believing the author
  • Example I cant understand how any reasonable
    person can believe God would condemn people to
    everlasting torment, just because they dont
    believe in Him.
  • Pointed Question Do you think justice is
    reasonable?

8
Motives in Place of Support
  • Popularity a proposition is argued to be true
    because it is widely held to be true
  • Example Except for a handful of Christian
    wackos with PhDs, all scientists agree that
    evolution is true.
  • Pointed Question Is Michael Denton a
    Christian wacko?

9
Changing the Subject
  • Attacking the Person
  • The person's character is attacked
  • William Dembski, a leader in the ID movement,
    couldnt get a job for three years after getting
    his PhD.
  • The person's circumstances are noted
  • The ID movement is funded by conservatives and
    big corporations
  • The person does not practice what is preached
    (the You Too argument)
  • You say the Koran teaches the killing of
    infidels, but the Old Testament says to kill
    non-believers, too.

10
Changing the Subject
  • Appeal to Authority
  • The authority is not an expert in the field
  • According to Thomas Jefferson, the real Jesus
    didnt perform any miracles! (Jefferson wasnt
    a theologian or historian).
  • Experts in the field disagree
  • The Jesus Seminar says the real Jesus only said
    about 12 of the sayings attributed to Him in the
    Gospels. (Many scholars disagree with the
    Seminar).
  • The authority was joking, drunk, or in some other
    way not being serious
  • Even John MacArthur says that all roads lead to
    heaven. (John was speaking in a sermon as if he
    were someone else).

11
Changing the Subject
  • Anonymous Authority the authority in question is
    not named
  • Example Scientists have found all sorts of
    contradictions in the Bible.
  • Pointed Question What contradictions have they
    found?

12
Changing the Subject
  • Style Over Substance the manner in which an
    argument (or arguer) is presented is felt to
    affect the truth of the conclusion
  • Example Bush cant string two words together
    without stumbling how can anyone think he knows
    what hes doing?
  • Pointed Question Have you ever known someone
    who is smart, but cant express himself very
    well?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com