Title: Analyzing the Results of an Experiment
1Analyzing the Results of an Experiment
- -not straightforward..
- Why not?
2Variability and Random/chance outcomes
3Inferential Statistics
- Statistical analysis appropriate for inferring
causal relationships and effects. - Many different formulaswhich one do you use?
4Inferential Stat selection
- -Determine that you are analyzing the results of
an experimental manipulation, not a correlation - Identify the IV and DV.
- The IV Will always be nominal on some level, even
when it may seem to be continuous..low, medium
and high doses of a drug
5Inf. Stat Selection
- What is the scale of the DV?
- Scale of DV -Statistic to use
Nominal Chi-squared
Ordinal Mann-Whitney U-test
Continuous T-test or ANOVA
6t-test or ANOVA?
- How many levels of the IV are there?
2 levels more than 2 levels
T-test or ANOVA ANOVA
7There are different forms of T-tests and
ANOVAsDid the Study Use a Within Group or
Between group Experimental Design?
Between Group Within Group
Only 2 levels of the IV Unpaired t-tests (or t for independent samples). Paired t-tests ( or t for dependent samples)
Unpaired t-tests (or t for independent samples). Paired t-tests ( or t for dependent samples)
OrANOVA ( the basic ANOVA is fitted for between group designs) OrWithin group ANOVA (often referred to as a repeated measures ANOVA)
More than 2 levels of the IV ANOVA Repeated Measures ANOVA
8In some ways all inferential Stats are similar.
- They calculate the probability that a result was
due to the IV as opposed to random variability - Lets focus on the Basic ANOVA since it is likely
to be the statistic you may use most commonly.
9ANOVA
- ANOVA produces an F-value.
- F values are the ratio of overall between group
Variability to the Mean within group variability - Between Var. ( chance) /Mean within grp.
Variability ( chance) - What does this mean?
10Lets suppose
- Experiment- IV marijuana
- Control
- Placebo control
- Low dose
- High dose
11Dependent Variable is
- Performance on a short term memory task measured
number correct out of 10 test items. - 9 subjects in each group
12Possible out come 1
13Possible Outcome 1Control Placebo Low
dose High dose
- 4 2 2 2
- 5 3 3 3
- 6 4 4 5
- 5 6 4 3
- 5 5 5 4
- 6 5 4 4
- 4 4 5 4
- 3 4 6 6
- 7 3 3 5
14Distribution of scores for control sample
15Placebo scores
16Low dose scores
17High dose scores
18The population distribution of scores
19F value relatively low
High
low
placebo
control
w/in grp. var
Between grp. Var
20Now consider this Possible Outcome
2Control Placebo Low dose High dose
- 4 2 2 2
- 5 3 3 3
- 6 4 4 5
- 5 6 4 3
- 5 5 5 4
- 6 5 4 4
- 4 4 5 4
- 3 4 6 6
- 7 3 3 5
21Distribution of scores for control sample
22Placebo scores
23Low dose scores
24High dose scores
25F value relatively High
High
low
placebo
control
w/in grp. var
Between grp. Var
26The high F value reflects
- Logic!
- Distribution of score are much more obviously
separated, and in this case are completely
non-overlapping - Low F values indicate highly overlapping score
distributions
27So how do we decide if an F value is large enough
to consider the result as causal?
- We consult a table of established probabilities
of different F values, within the context of
Degree of freedom terms
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30ANOVA Significance table
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33Where is/are the difference (s)?
34Inferential Statistics
35The story of Scratch
36Why not jus use repeated t-tests? Probability
pyramiding
- 15 t-tests required for this data set
- Post-hocs include compensations for repeated
testing of a large data set
37After all this where so we stand?We can still be
wrong.
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Factors that affect power.Sample size
41One vs two-tailed testing
42(No Transcript)
43 44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)