Title: The Use of Modeling for Site Surveys
1The Use of Modeling for Site Surveys
- Marc Sarazin
- European Southern Observatory
2The Ideal Sites of the Past
- In the 40s
- On the national territory
- Close to a major educational center
- Cloud free area
- In the 60s
- Cloud free area
- Good seeing
- In the 80s
- Cloud free area (higher operation cost)
- Good seeing (better optics)
- Low precipitable water vapor (IR)
3The Ideal Sites of the Present
- Common Trends
- Telescopes and instruments are seeing limited
- Observatories operate in flexible scheduling
modes - Observatories are equipped with seeing monitoring
facilities - Observatories are equipped with cloud monitoring
facilities - Observatories receive meteorological forecasts
- Basic Site Requirements
- Cloud free area (spectroscopic sky gt 80 of the
time) - Good seeing (median lt1 at 0.5 micron)
4The Ideal Sites of the Present
- Requirements by Observing Technique
- Photometry and Spectroscopy
- Photometric sky (stable and isotropic extinction
coefficients) - Low light pollution (evolution controlled by
state laws) - Good seeing
- Classical Imaging
- Good seeing and slowly varying
- Imaging assisted by classical NGS adaptive optics
- Good seeing (nr. actuators) and low wavefront
velocity - Low high altitude turbulence (large isoplanatic
angle)
5The Ideal Sites of the (near) Future
- Requirements by Observing Technique
- Observations assisted by classical LGS adaptive
optics - Same as above
- Photometric sky (photon return of sodium laser
guide star) - Observations assisted by multi-conjugate LGS
adaptive optics - Same as above
- The increase in the corrected field of view
scales as the isoplanatic angle
6The Ideal Sites of the (near) Future
Have all good sites been discovered? Can a
continental site provide excellent seeing
conditions? Comparison of the seeing
distribution at Maidanak (Uzbekistan) with
conditions at ESO Observatories (Ehgamberdiev et
al., AA suppl, Aug. 2000)
7The new parameters for site surveys
The wind velocity at the tropopause is a good
indicator of the global isoplanatic
angle ESO-Paranal DIMM isoplanatic angle
compared to ECWMF 200mB wind during 9
months. (correction for exposure time averaging
of scintillation after A. Tokovinin, ESO internal
memo, July 2000)
8The new parameters for Site Surveys
The performance of AO systems is ultimately
determined by the real time vertical distribution
of the turbulence Gemini Web site Scidar
profiles at Mauna Kea (F. Roddier et al. SPIE Vol
1236, 485, 1990)
9The new parameters for site surveys
Climate Change is a reality also for the
astronomical seeing
Oscillations with periods from a few months to a
few decades
10The new parameters for site surveys
Pacific decadal oscillation, El Nino, global
warming?
Surveying a site for a few years long is not
safe climate change must be taken into account
11The new parameters for site surveys
The apparent magnitude of Sodium Laser Guide
Stars is naturally variable in time. It also
depends on the atmospheric transmission (A.
Quirrenbach, session VII) Variation of the
sodium profile through the night of August 31,
2000 at La Palma. Source Dainty et al., Imperial
College http//op.ph.ic.ac.uk/research/
12The Ideal Sites of the Future
- Additional Requirements
- Low Seismic Activity
- An ELT cannot be made stiff enough to survive
earthquakes - Low Wind at ground level
- An ELT is more sensitive to wind shake during
tracking - Crystal Clear Skies
- Laser guide star efficiency depends on
atmospheric extinction
13The new tools for site surveys
Coarse Cloudiness Maps are readily available. A
few km resolution is accessible (A. Erasmus,
session V) Source Surface Meteorology and Solar
Energy Data Set (SSE) of NASA's Earth Science
Enterprise Program (1x1 degree grid).
14The new tools for site surveys
Peak Ground Acceleration up to 5m/s2 10
probability of exceedance in 50 years
Source http//www.seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP/
15The new tools for site surveys
Global Models The wind at 700mb is not
accurately represented over mountains
ECMWF analysis over northern Chile, 60km (0.5
degree) grid.
16The new tools for site surveys
Global Models The wind at 500mb is accurately
represented
ECMWF analysis over northern Chile, 60km (0.5
degree) grid.
17The new tools for site surveys
Global Models The relative humidity is hard to
model accurately
ECMWF analysis over northern Chile
18The new tools for site surveys
Global Models Seasonal Variations are accurately
represented
ECMWF analysis over the VLT Observatory Paranal
in 1993
19The new tools for site surveys
Mesoscale models reveal local orographic effects
on the flow The terrain model, covers 120x120 km
with 500 m resolution. The initialization is
done at one corner with the grid point values of
a global model
First attempts to model the seeing at ESO Paranal
Observatory using Meteo-France Meso-Nh model
(Masciadri et al., 1997)
20The new tools for site surveys
Non-hydrostatic models can account for local
orographic effects on the potential temperature
because they allow vertical motion
First attempts to model the seeing at ESO Paranal
Observatory using Meteo-France Meso-Nh
model (Masciadri et al., 1997)
21The new tools for site surveys
Vertical cut of the turbulence Cn2 along the E-W
direction centered on Paranal
First attempts to model the seeing at ESO Paranal
Observatory using Meteo-France Meso-Nh
model (Masciadri et al., 1997)
22The new tools for site surveys
First attempts to model the seeing at ESO Paranal
Observatory using Meteo-France Meso-Nh
model (Masciadri et al., 1997) Map of the
integrated seeing in an area centered on Paranal
23The new tools for site surveys
MM5, a mesoscale model is available as freeware.
It is used at the Mauna Kea Weather Center
(http//hokukea.soest.hawaii.edu/forecast/mko/) to
produce vertical profiles of the
turbulence. Comparison of MM5 profiles above
Mauna Kea Observatory with in situ SCIDAR
observations