One-way migration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

One-way migration

Description:

Title: Modeling Populations Author: ozlen Last modified by: ozlen Created Date: 12/30/2003 9:47:04 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ozl
Category:
Tags: mate | migration | one | selection | way

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: One-way migration


1
One-way migration
2
Migration
  • There are two populations (x and y), each with a
    different frequency of A alleles (px and py).
  • Assume migrants are from population x, and
    residents are population x unidirectional).
  • After migration, m is the migrant portion of the
    population y, and (1-m) is the resident portion
    of the population y. py is the p after
    migration
  • py m x px (1-m) x py
  • dpy m x px (1-m) x py py
  • dpy m x px py m x py py
  • dpy m x px m x py
  • dpy m(px-py)

3
Change in allele frequency with one-way migration
(m 0.01)
4
Natural Selection
  • The interaction between alleles and environment
    shapes the direction of the change in allele
    frequencies resulting in evolution of adaptable
    traits.

5
Fitness and coefficient of selection (s)
  • Darwinian fitness is defined as the relative
    reproductive ability of a genotype.
  • The genotype that produces the most offspring is
    assigned a fitness (W) value of 1. Selection
    coefficient (s) equals (1-W)
  • AA produces on average 8 offspring
  • Aa produces on average 4 offspring
  • aa produces on average 2 offspring.
  • WAA 1.0 sAA 1-1 0
  • WAa 0.5 sAa 1-0.5 0.5
  • Waa 0.25 saa 1-0.25 0.75

6
How to calculate change in allele frequency after
selection
AA Aa aa
Initial genotypic frequencies p2 2pq q2
Fitness WAA WAa Waa
Frequency after selection p2 WAA 2pq WAa q2 Waa
Relative frequency after selection p2 WAA/WMEAN 2pq WAa /WMEAN q2 Waa /WMEAN
Wmean p2 WAA 2pq WAa q2 Waa
7
Possibilities
  1. WAA WAa Waa no natural selection
  2. WAA WAa lt 1.0 and Waa 1.0 natural
    selection and complete dominance operate against
    a dominant allele.
  3. WAA WAa 1.0 and Waa lt 1.0 natural selection
    and complete dominance operate against a
    recessive allele.
  4. WAA lt WAa lt 1.0 and Waa 1.0 heterozygote
    shows intermediate fitness natural selection
    operates without effects of complete dominance.
  5. WAA and Waa lt 1.0 and WAa 1.0 heterozygote
    has the highest fitness natural
    selection/codominance favor the heterozygote
    (also called overdominance).
  6. WAa lt WAA and Waa 1.0 heterozygote has lowest
    fitness natural selection favors either
    homozygote.

8
Selection against a recessive lethal phenotype
  • Recessive trait result in reduced fitness.
  • Frequency of the recessive allele decreases over
    time.
  • Not completely eliminated since present in
    heterozygotes.

9
Heterozygote superiority
  • Distribution of malaria and frequency of Hb-s
    allele leading to sickle cell disease in
    homozygotes.

10
Balance between mutation and selection
  • When an allele becomes rare, changes in frequency
    due to natural selection are small.
  • Mutation occurs at the same time and produces new
    rare alleles.
  • For a complete recessive allele at equilibrium
  • q vµ/s
  • If homozygote recessive is lethal (s 1) then q

11
Model 1
  • Simulate the change in allele frequencies
    directly by mathematical modeling of the forces
    that act on them.
  • Set initial values for p and q
  • Set initial sample size (effective population
    size)
  • Set the HWE as the null model (p2 2pq q2
    1)
  • Allow for forces such as mutation rate,
    migration, genetic drift, and selection to act on
    the null model.
  • Estimate the change in allele frequencies over
    time using iterations (i.e., the program loops
    over for a number of generations as given by the
    arguments).

12
Model 2
  • Simulate individuals of a population(s) having
    DNA sequence polymorphisms, and allow them to
    evolve randomly or under certain forces.
  • Set initial number of individuals (N at t 0,
    equals to the effective size of the population,
    Ne)
  • Generate a null matrix for N x K x G, where K 2
    (diploid), and G equals to the number of genes
    considered (start with a single gene, if else
    assume genes are not linked for simplicity).
  • Set the total number of alleles (Nk, start with
    Nk 2) for each G.
  • Set the initial number of homozygotes,
    heterozygotes for G.
  • Allow for the individuals mate randomly to
    produce offspring, iterate to simulate
    generations for simplicity assume that all
    individuals die after reproduction. E.g., annual
    plants where Nt1 bNt 0 Nt
  • Allow for forces to act on the null model, and
    test their effects on the allelic evolution.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com