Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS

Description:

... User specifies the offset distance f EXAMPLE NOZZLES Spraying systems LN-2 High-pressure micro-nozzles A, ... (LN-2 NOZZLE) 0.4 m below the nozzle 20 bar ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Hostik
Category:
Tags: fds | micro | mist | modeling | nozzle | spray | water

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS


1
Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS
  • Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference
    2011
  • Simo Hostikka, Jukka Vaari, Topi Sikanen, Antti
    PaajanenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
SPRAY COMPUTATIONS IN FDS
Droplet momentum
Size distribution
7
DRAG REDUCTION BY WAKE EFFECT
L
Ramírez-Munoz et al. (2007).
8
INTRODUCING THE DROPLETS INTO THE COMPUTATION
  • Segment of a spherical surface
  • Here ? 5 and ? 0
  • Initial velocity
  • User specifies the offset distance

f
9
EXAMPLE NOZZLES
  • Spraying systems LN-2
  • High-pressure micro-nozzles A, B and C from
    Marioff.
  • Multi-orifice spray heads

10
SPRAY PROFILE TESTS
NFPA 750
11
RESULTS SPRAY PROFILES (LN-2 NOZZLE)
  • 0.4 m below the nozzle
  • 20 bar pressure

12
RESULTS SPRAY PROFILES (A, B, C NOZZLES)
  • 1 m below the nozzle
  • 70 bar pressure

13
AIR ENTRAINMENT TESTS
  • Rectangular channel 2.0 m ? 0.6 m ? 0.6 m
  • Multi-orifice nozzles in the middle of the
    channel
  • Pressures 5010 bar
  • Air speed measurement 0.5 m upstream (center
    and 6 cm from wall)

14
RESULTS AIR ENTRAINMENT
Channel center 6 cm from wall
  • SH4 and SH5 have different perimeter angles
  • Difference in momentum transfer difficult to
    capture
  • Results were sensitive to offset value

15
RADIATION ATTENUATION TESTS
  • LPG gas heater
  • 0.2 m ? 0.3 m
  • Temperature 950 ?C
  • Nozzles A, B and C
  • 50, 70 and 100 bar
  • Experimental uncertainty lt 7

16
RADIATION ATTENUATION SIMULATIONS
  • Two sets of simulations
  • Set 1 good resolution
  • Set 2 even better

17
RADIATION ATTENUATION RESULTS
  • Set 1
  • Set 2

18
RADIATION ATTENUATION SENSITIVITY STUDY
?x 1.0 cm DROP INSERT RATE 1?105 1/s
?x 2.0 cm DROP INSERT RATE 1?105 1/s
19
(No Transcript)
20
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • Spray profile measurements were performed by
    Maria Putkiranta, Riina Rajala, Pentti
    Saarenrinne and Markus Honkanen of the Tampere
    University of Technology.
  • Co-operation with the members of the FDS
    development team
  • Funding
  • Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and
    Innovation,
  • Marioff Corporation Oy,
  • Rautaruukki Oyj,
  • YIT Kiinteistötekniikka Oy
  • Insinööritoimisto Markku Kauriala Ltd.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com