Title: Human Evolution
1Human Evolution
2What is a Hominid?
- Modern humans our direct and indirect ancestors
after our lineage split from the chimpanzee - Until recently, earliest hominids were dated
between 3.5 and 2.4 mya placed in the genus
Australopithecus - In last few years, time range of Australopithecus
pushed back to 4.2 mya, distribution expanded to
include regions outside E. and S. Africa - New finds from 4.5-7 mya are thought to be
hominids that predate Australopithecines,
although their status is debated
3Hominid Sites
- Earliest fossil hominid sites are in Africa
- They now span the latest Miocene to the early
Pleistocene from about 6-7 mya to about 1.6 mya - The major groups of sites are
- Ethiopia Middle Awash valley Hadar
(Australopithecus afarensis) - Kenya Lake Turkana
- Tanzania Olduvai Gorge
- South Africa various sites in limestone caverns
centered around Sterkfontein
4What Makes A Hominid? - Bipedalism
- Primary feature distinguishing hominids from
other hominoids is walking erect on two legs
erect bipedalism - Adaptations for bipedalism in the the partial
skeleton of Lucy, an australopithecine ( 3.2
mya) clearly seen in the hip, spine and leg bones
5Why did bipedalism become the primary adaptation
of hominids?
- Carrying behavior
- Reduction of overall heat stress - facilitates
heat loss through convection by exposing body to
air currents, only humans have sweat glands that
produce moisture to cool body - Most energy efficient way to travel long
distances - Allows for better vision in open environments
defensive action against predators by freeing
hands to throw objects
6Evidence for Early Bipedalism
- The record of bipedalism is most graphically
preserved in the fossilized footprints at
Laetoli, Tanzania! - 3.6 million year old tracks left by 2
individuals were uncovered in volcanic ash by
Mary Leakey (1978-79)
- Footprints were left by 2 australopithecines in
damp volcanic ash of Laetoli - In the Laetoli trail, prints of the 2 individuals
can be seen walking away from us - Notice how close the tracks are!
7Laetoli Footprints
- Laetoli footprints clearly show that the
creatures who made them were fully bipedal - Big toe hardly diverges from the rest of the
foot, unlike in apes - Gait heel-strike followed by toe-off the
way modern humans walk
8Laetoli Reconstruction
- In this reconstruction, the 2 early hominids,
identified as Australopithecus afarensis, walk
bipedally across an open ash field produced by an
erupting volcano - Region is wooded, but here trees are absent and
the volcanic ash, wetted by a light shower of
rain formed a flat shallow layer in which
footprints are deeply implanted - Footprints filled up with yet more ash, and were
thus preserved - Footprints reveal that, even at this early stage
of human evolution, our ancestors walked upright
with striding gait very similar to our own
9Orrorin Earliest Evidence for Walking on Two
Legs?
How far back in time does the record of
bipedalism extend?
- Fossils from Turgen Hills in Kenya have been
dated to about 6 mya - Include upper portion of a femur, lower portion
of the humerus, some lower jaw fragments, teeth
- Arm bone virtually identical to that of a
chimpanzee - Femur more human-like,most important for
showing adaptations for walking on 2 legs - Was Orrorin a direct human ancestor, or close to
the common ancestor of chimps and humans?
10Ardipithecus Earliest True Hominid?
- Between 4.5 and 5.5 mya from the Middle Awash
valley site - Remains very fragmentary limb bones, toe bones,
jaws teeth - Straight toe bones suggest it may have been
bipedal - Ardipithecus Orrorin are candidates for last
common ancestor of chimps humans - Each have mosaic of features seen in later
hominids modern chimpanzee
IT MAY WELL BE THAT THE LAST COMMON ANCESTOR OF
CHIMPS AND PEOPLE HAD A MIX OF FEATURES SOME
RETAINED IN HUMANS, OTHERS RETAINED IN CHIMPS!
11Hominid Evolution
12Australopithecus anamensis
- Turkana region of Kenya
- Dated to 4.2-3.9 MYA
- Probably walked upright
- Teeth covered with enamel much thicker than that
of Ardipithecus, so diet may have had
hard-to-chew foods
13Australopithecus anamensis
- Lived roughly 4 mya
- Only a few anamensis fossils have been found
- Those shown here include jawbone part of the
front of the face, parts of an arm bone (radius),
fragments of a lower leg bone (tibia)
14(No Transcript)
15Australopithecus afarensis
- Eastern Africa 3.9 3.0 MYA
- Pelvis and leg bones resemble modern humans in
some ways - Sexually dimorphic in body size
- May have been adept at tree climbing, based on
curvature of finger and toe bones - Ape-like features
- Small brain case averaging 430 cc
- Prognathic (jutting out) face
- U-shaped palate vs. the parabolic shape of modern
humans - Reduced canines
16Australopithecus afarensis
17A. afarensis Skeleton - Lucy
18Paranthropus aethiopicus
- Eastern Africa, dated 2.7-2.3 MYA
- Note widely flaring zygomatic arches (bones
arching around side of skull to join below eyes,
forming cheeks). Prominent sagittal crest
largest ever discovered in human lineage and
cheek teeth are correspondingly large.
Adaptations for heavy chewing - Small cranial capacity (410 cc) and prognathic
face - Black skull exhibits features more like A.
afarensis
19Paranthropus aethiopicus
20Paranthropus boisei (KNM-ER 406)
- Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania dated 2.2 1.2 MYA
- Absolutely largest teeth found in any hominid
species referred to as hyper-robust due to
massive molar and premolar teeth - Skull has extremely broad, short face with
flaring zygomatic arches (cheek bones),
relatively small brain, pronounced sagittal crest
in males - Skull and dental features adaptations for heavy
chewing
21Paranthropus boisei (KNM-ER 406)
22Paranthropus boisei (KNM-ER 406)
23Paranthropus boisei (OH 5)
24Kenyanthropus platyops
- Kenya, 3.5 to 3.2 MYA
- Ancestral features
- small ear canal more like that of chimps, A.
anamensis Ardipithecus - shape small size of braincase
- Derived features relatively flat face and small
molars - Importance flat, human-like face appeared early
in evolution alongside range of other facial
forms not outcome of progressive, linear
evolution
25Australopithecus africanus
- 3.3 2.5 MYA in Transvaal region of South Africa
- First australopithecine to be described (1924)
- More globular cranium slightly higher ratio of
brain to body size - Teeth face appear less ancestral (reduced in
size relative to earlier forms, face less
prognathic) - May represent 2 species or one very sexually
dimorphic species - Proportions of arm to leg lengths may be more
ape-like than in A. afarensis
26Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus africanus
Ms. Ples best known A. Africanus cranium
front view
Ms. Ples best known A. Africanus cranium
lateral view
Taung Child
STS 71 Most complete A. africanus skull
Partial skeleton of A. africanus discovered in
1950s
27Paranthropus robustus
- South Africa, 2.0-1.0 MYA
- Short, broad face with deep zygomatic arches
large temporal fossa. Larger individuals (males?)
have sagittal crests - Very large cheek teeth covered with thick enamel
- Wear patterns on teeth indicate herbivorous diet
of harder, more resistant, perhaps smaller food
items than A. africanus - Lived in secondary grasslands near rivers and
wetlands
28Paranthropus robustus
29Paranthropus robustus
This recently discovered (1999) skull of
Paranthropus robustus from Drimolen, South Africa
is the most complete found so far
(reversed image)image)
Note the remarkable similarity to the newly found
but older skull of A. africanus (above),
reinforcing notion that the 2 species represent a
single ancestor-descendent lineage
Note remarkable similarity
30Hominid Evolution
31Australopithecus garhi
- 2-3 mya lack of adequate hominid fossil record
in Eastern Africa - 2.5 mya Recently discovered Hominid cranial
dental remains in Ethiopia - Recognition of new species of Australopithecus
- Descended from Australopithecus afarensis a
candidate ancestor for early Homo
32Australopithecus garhi
- Discovered at Bouri, Ethiopia in 1999
- Found with butchered bones maybe oldest
toolmaker - Oldest stone tools are also dated to about 2.5
mya - Ancestral to Homo? Right place at the right time
33Australopithecus garhi
One surprise in the A. garhi skull was enormous
back teeth, instead of smaller ones seen in later
Homo species (Video Image/UC Berkeley)
34Australopithecus garhi
Not yet clear whether A. garhi falls on the
direct lineage leading to modern humans, or lies
on an extinct side-branch
35Australopithecus garhi
- EARLIEST BUTCHERS Signs that hominids scraped
and smashed animal bones, like this tibia, 2.5
mya - Antelope tibia shaft has been shattered,
smashed, and cut by stone tools - The earliest documented percussion marks made by
hominids, presumably extracting fatty marrow from
these bones
36Rise of the genus Homo
- Earliest come from the same African sites as
Australopithecus - Most date between 2.4 and 1.8 mya
- Homo habilis means handy man
- Growing consensus that there may be 2 or more
species of Homo by 2 mya
37Homo habilis (KNM-ER 1813)
- East Africa, 2.4-1.6 MYA
- 3 traits define H. habilis as transitional
species - Expanded cranial capacity (590-710 cc)
- Reduced post-canine tooth size
- A precision grip, provides anatomical basis for
tool-making - One of many problems obtaining accurate brain
volume estimates from crushed and/or distorted
skulls - May represent 2 or more species
38Homo habilis (KNM-ER 1813)
39Homo rudolfensis (KNM-ER 1470)
- East Africa, 2.2-1.8 MYA
- Distinguished from other specimens of early Homo
by - Slight supra-orbital brow ridge across the
forehead with no trough behind - Less prognathic longer face, squared off
maxilla - Discovery of Kenyanthropus, similar facial
features, have led some to see link between
platyops and rudolfensis, representing a
distinct hominid lineage placing 1470 in the
new genus as Kenyanthropus rudolfensis
40Homo rudolfensis (KNM-ER 1470)
41Hominid Evolution