Title: By: Julee Christianson,
1HYATT REGENCY HOTEL WALKWAYS COLLAPSE ENGINEE
RING FAILURE
- By Julee Christianson,
- Mike Cruz, and
- Katie Nolan
2WHERE Kansas City, MissouriDATE July 17, 1981
3rd Floor Walkway Still Intact
3Outline
- The Hotel and the Incident
- The Causes and the Problems
- Controversy and Conclusion
- References
4People Involved
- The owner - Crown Center Redevelopment
Corporation - The fabricator - Havens Steel Company
- The engineering design team - G.C.E.
International, Inc. - -Professional Consulting Firm of Structural
Engineers - -Previously known as Jack D. Gillum
Associates, Ltd. - Main People involved in the Design The
Principals - Jack D. Gillum, P.E. - structural engineering
state licensed since February 26, 1968Daniel M.
Duncan, P.E. - structural engineering state
licensed since February 27, 1979
5Who Agreed to What?
- Crown entered into a standard contract with
G.C.E. International, Inc. on April 4, 1978 - G.C.E. agreed to provide, "all structural
engineering services for a 750-room hotel
projected located at 2345 McGee Street, Kansas
City, Missouri. - In December 1978, Eldridge Construction Company,
the general contractor on the Hyatt project,
entered into a subcontract with Havens Steel
Company Professional Fabricator, who agreed to
fabricate and erect the atrium steel for the
Hyatt project. -
6Hotel Features
- The hotel had a grand lobby which featured a
multistory atrium crossed by three concrete
walkways on the second, third and fourth floors - The hotel advertised to have many parties and
events
7Tea-Dance Party Leads to Disaster
- A party was held in the lobby
- Over 2,000 people were in attendance
- People crowded the walkways and the lobby below
to watch the dance competition - The excess weight caused the fourth floor walkway
to fall onto the second floor walkway and both
walkways collapsed onto the crowded first floor - The collapse left 114 dead and more than 200
injured - This was the United States most devastating
structural failure of the time
8The Cause
- The reason for the collapse was determined to be
in the engineering design for the suspended
walkways - The original box beam design (which was not
actually used) did not meet the requirements of
the Kansas City building code - However, the design that was used was even less
safe than the original
9- Modified Design (was used)
The 2nd and 4th floor walkways were originally
supposed to be suspended from the same rod and
held in place by nuts
The fabricator had modified the design to use two
hanging rods and the engineers approved the
change without checking it
On a preliminary design a note was made that the
hanging rods needed to have strength of 413 MPa,
but that note was left out on the final design
and so the fabricator used hanger rods with only
248 MPa of strength
10Design Problems
- Havens proposed the modified design to simplify
the assembly task and to eliminate the need to
thread the entire length of the rods - However, the change in the design doubled the
stress put forth on the nut which was under the
fourth floor beam and with the change the nut had
to support the weight of two walkways instead of
just one - The ultimate capacity actually available using
the original connection detail would have been
approximately 60 of that expected of a
connection designed in accordance with AISC
Specifications according to the National
Building Specifications
11FAILURE What Went Wrong?
- The box beams resting on the supporting rod nuts
and washers were deformed because of the stress
that was exerted on them - The box beam resting on the nuts and washers on
the rods could no longer hold up the load. - The box beams (and walkways) separated from the
ceiling rods - The second and fourth floor walkways fell to the
atrium first floor with the fourth floor walkway
coming to rest on top of the second
12THE HANGER ROD THREADS, WASHER AND SUPPORTING
NUTNOTE THE DEFORMATION IN THE WASHER CAUSED
THE BEAM TO SLIP
13Close-ups of some of the 4th Floor Beams
14Interesting Findings
- On October 14, 1979, part of the atrium roof
collapsed while the hotel was under construction - On October 16, 1979, G.C.E.'s Gillum wrote the
owner, stating that he was undertaking both an
atrium collapse investigation as well as a
thorough design check of all the members
comprising the atrium roof. G.C.E. promised to
check all steel connections in the structures,
not just those fund in the roof - Reports were sent to the owner assuring the
overall safety of the entire atrium - Seeing that G.C.E. said the atrium was safe, the
hotel was opened in July 1980 - The Hotel had only been in operation for about
one year at the time of the collapse
15Controversy
- After the change in the design, the Havens Steel
Company claims that they informed G.C.E.
International Inc. of the alteration, but the
engineering firm denies ever receiving such a
call for change approval - However, Jack D. Gillums seal of approval was
attached to the revised design drawings
16Engineering Ethics
- Daniel M. Duncan, Jack D. Gillum, and G.C.E.
International, Inc., were charged by the Missouri
Board of Architects, Professional Engineers and
Land Surveyors of gross negligence, incompetence,
misconduct and unprofessional conduct in the
practice of engineering in connection with their
performance of engineering services in the design
and construction of the Hyatt Regency Hoteland
later they were found guilty
17In Conclusion
- The two structural engineers lost their
Professional Engineering licenses and are no
longer able to practice in the states of Missouri
and Texas - Both are now practicing in other states
- A number of firms were bankrupt
- Many expensive legal suits were settled out of
court
18References
- Harris Jr., Charles E., Michael S. Pritchard, and
Michael J. Rabins. Engineering Ethics.
Wadsworth, 1995. - Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse.
Engineering.com. 13 Nov 2007. lthttp//www.enginee
ring.com/ Library/ ArticlesPage/tabid/85/PageID/19
9/ArticleID/175/articleType/ArticleView/Defau lt.a
spxgt. - Martin, Rachel. Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse.
26 Nov 2007. lthttp//www.eng.uab.edu/cee/faculty/
ndelatte/case_studies_project/Hyatt20 - Regency/hyatt.htmgt.
- Texas AM University. Engineering Ethics. 27
Nov 2007. lthttp//ethics.tamu.edu/ethics/
hyatt/hyatt1.htmgt.