Unsupervised Clustering in Multimodal Multiparty Meeting Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Unsupervised Clustering in Multimodal Multiparty Meeting Analysis

Description:

Unsupervised Clustering in Multimodal Multiparty Meeting Analysis The aim: to investigate the role of participant nonverbal signals exchanged in shaping the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: przemka
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unsupervised Clustering in Multimodal Multiparty Meeting Analysis


1
Unsupervised Clustering in Multimodal Multiparty
Meeting Analysis
2
(No Transcript)
3
The aim
  • to investigate the role of participant
    nonverbal signals exchanged in shaping the
    content of agreement

4
Challenges in multimodal meeting analysis
  • No clear and explicit definitions, particularly
    for functional categorizations
  • A lot more annotations need to be made than in
    the case of spoken dialogues

5
The experiment
  • Six people A F sitting around a table, face to
    face they have to reach consensus on a given
    subject
  • No pre-determined roles were imposed. None of
    the members had professional knowledge about the
    topic.
  • Taking notes on a sheet of paper, no computers

6
  • Head movements are calculated by looking at
    differences between a given frame and the
    previous frame
  • Faces indicated by circles, head directions by
    lines

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
2 methods
  • Method 1 classifies the amplitude of the optical
    flow into 3 classes and, excluding the class with
    the smallest amplitude, classifies the direction
    of the face into 3 classes.
  • Method 2 decomposes the optical flow into
    horizontal and vertical amplitude, and classifies
    these data with 2 dimensional features into 4
    classes.

10
  • Speech utterances, including verbal
    backchannels, are frequent except from the clerk
    A.
  • Main speaker utterances are accompanied by
    nonverbal behaviors.
  • Nonverbal responses given by B, E, and F appear
    even without accompanying verbal utterances.
  • After D yields the main speaker role to C, D
    doesnt produce nonverbal behaviors.

11
  • C produced a proposal
  • B, D, F nonverbal responses, E almost no
    nonverbal responses
  • B, D, F strong support of the proposal
  • E didnt get the merit of the idea and directed
    to C a refinement question.

12
Conclusions
  • By combining statistical and qualitative
    analysis, it was possible to obtain a clear
    picture of the interrelationships between types
    of movements, gaze shifts and head movements, and
    interaction organization functions of listener
    responses, degree of engagement and support.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com