Aucun titre de diapositive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Aucun titre de diapositive

Description:

Title: Aucun titre de diapositive Author: CNES Last modified by: Polly A. Lynn Created Date: 10/12/1999 9:32:30 AM Document presentation format: A4 Paper (210x297 mm) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: CNES79
Learn more at: https://cwe.ccsds.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aucun titre de diapositive


1
Proposal to P1A P1B Increasing allowed frame
lengths and interleaving depths for AOS TM
2
Summary
  • Background
  • Targeted applications e.g. Pleiades-HR
  • Rationale for changes
  • Impacts w.r.t. blue books
  • Conclusion

3
Background
  • Present limitations w.r.t. frame length
    interleaving
  • AOS blue book
  • limits VCDU length to 5 x 223 1115 octets when
    RS is used
  • not consistent with new RS option (239, 255, E8)
    introduced in TM channel coding blue book
  • frame length limitations should be removed from
    AOS in the  Yamada  restructured edition
  • TM channel coding blue book (June 2001)
  • limits transfert frame (VCDU) length to
  • 1115 octets (RS(223,255)), 1195 octets
    (RS(239,255)) when RS is used
  • interleaving depths for RS , I 1, , 5

4
Background (cnt d)
  • Packet TM blue book
  • max frame length of 2048 octets (max capability
    of 11-bit FHP)
  • ESA TM channel coding Packet TM standards
  • allows interleaving depths for RS , I 1, 2, 3,
    4, 5 8
  • max frame length 2040 octets (both for coded
    uncoded cases)

5
Background (cnt d)
  • Rationale for theses limitations
  • loss of power efficiency was considered small
    (for low rate systems) between I 5 and I8 or
    16 for  Conv(7,1/2)RS(223,255)  over BPSK
  • approx. 0,4 dB loss (Eb/N0) _at_ FER 10-8 (between
    I5 and I8)
  • provide acceptable frame sync rate for low to
    medium data rate mission few kbps to few Mbps
  • limit the number of packets being lost whenever
    a frame is lost optimization in terms of FER ?
  • limit the complexity of the RS encoder ?

6
Background (cnt d)
  • New channel coding options and modulation
    schemes are being introduced in CCSDS blue books
    to cover the needs of  bandwidth limited high
    rate  earth orbiting missions
  • RS (239, 255, E8) code
  • punctured convolutional code (7,1/2) with
    punctured rates 2/3, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8 (as per
    DVB-S standard)
  • Multidimentional Treillis Coded Modulation (MTCM)
    8-PSK modulation scheme
  • Example of such  bandwidth limited high
    rate  missions
  • PLEIADES-HR

7
Targeted applications e.g. PLEIADES-HR
  • High resolution earth observation satellites
  • Mission parameters
  • sun synchronous orbit 500 - 800 km
  • resolution (optical) 0.6 to 2.5 m
  • radiometric precision 8 to 12 bits/pixel
  • swath 15 to 60 km
  • instrument data rates 128 Mbits/s to 2 Gbits/s
  • image compression - Compression Ratio 3 to 6
  • compressed rate per instrument 50 Mbits/s to
    500 Mbits/s
  • BER requirement BER lt 10-10 to 10-12 due to
    compression

8
Targeted applications e.g. PLEIADES-HR
  • Constraints
  • minisats or small sats
  • severely mass power limited
  • Payload TM at X-band 375 MHz in total
  • band limited
  • Transmission data rates needed 128 Mbits/s to
    600 Mb/s
  • depending on nb of ground stations, on-board
    mass memory capacity
  • Rate can be splitted into up to 4 channels
  • 150 Mb/s max per channel
  • standard P/L TM I/F would be a plus for
    interoperability and standardisation of equipment
    in multimission X-band recieving stations

9
Targeted applications e.g. PLEIADES-HR
  • PLEIADES-HR payload TM characteristics
  • 0.65 m resolution, 20 km swath
  • 620 Mb/s of user data rate to ground at X-band
  • 4 carriers 155 Mb/s user data rate each
  • MTCM 8-PSK modulation _at_ 2.5 bits/symbol
    (compliant with future CCSDS recommendation)
  • RS (238,254) used as outer code, interleave depth
    5, 8 or 16 ?
  • required BER of 10-12
  • due to image compression
  • compressed image data formated as CCSDS source
    packets
  • each packet contains 8 compressed lines (for a
    portion of swath)

10
Targeted applications e.g. PLEIADES-HR
  • packets inserted in AOS frames
  • AOS selected because of high rates (24-bit frame
    counter)
  • Insert zone of transfer frame used to carry 12
    bytes of ancillary data
  • interest on this project to develop generic
    equipment with interfaces based on
    non-proprietary standards
  • equipments image compression unit, mass memory,
    modulator
  • standard I/F
  • CCSDS image lossy compression (algorithm
    source format) ?
  • CCSDS source packet
  • AOS VCDU, AOS CVCDU and CADU
  • CCSDS 8-PSK RF interface.

11
Rationale for changes
  • 2 penalties identified for PLEIADES-HR w.r.t.
    CCSDS compatibility
  • transfer frame format overhead
  • due to limited allowed frame length
  • loss of power efficiency on the link
  • due to limited allowed interleaving depth for RS
    outer code

12
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • Frame format overhead
  • overhead
  • VCDU frame header 6 octets
  • M-PDU header 2 octets
  • Insert 12 octets
  • ancillary data sampled _at_ 8 Hz max
  • Frame rate 5 kHz _at_ I16, 16 kHz _at_ I5

13
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • Vast oversampling of ancillary data
  • frame sync rate much higher than needed
  • between I5 and I16 represents a net capacity
    loss of 7.5 Mbps
  • as a reference SPOT5 TM proprietary format has
    an overhead of 0.52

14
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • Loss of power efficiency
  • comparison of BER (and FER) performance for
    various interleave depth of the RS(238, 254)
    outer code
  • I 5, I 8, I 16 and infinite interleave
  • 2 modulation schemes taken as reference
  • MTCM 8-PSK _at_ 2 bits/symbol
  • MTCM 8-PSK _at_ 2.5 bits/symbol (PLEIADES-HR)
  • 2 performance levels in terms of BER
  • 10-10
  • 10-12
  • simulations were feasible down to BER10-9
    (typ.)
  • extrapolations were done for lower BER

15
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • Simulations were cross-verified by experiment on
    modulator breadboard
  • for I 16 only
  • implementation losses (FI 720 MHz w.r.t. simus)
    were substracted
  • 0.2 dB _at_ 2b/symbol
  • 0.32 dB _at_ 2.5 b/symbol

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • 1st case MTCM 8-PSK _at_ 2 bits/symbol

19
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • 2nd case MTCM 8-PSK _at_ 2.5 bits/symbol

20
Rationale for changes (ctn d)
  • I 8 gives a 1 dB gain _at_ 10-12 over I 5 for
    8-PSK 2.5 b/s/Hz
  • I 16 gives a 0.4 dB gain _at_ 10-12 over I 8 for
    8-PSK 2.5 b/s/Hz
  • very significant gain for power constrained
    spacecraft transmiting at 600 Mbps

21
Proposed changes to existing Blue Books
  • 1st solution add I 8 as a valid interleaving
    depth for RS
  • impacts TM channel coding blue book
  • impacts AOS blue book if frame length
    constraints left in that book
  • frame length constraints will be removed anyway
    from that book in the restructured version
  • 2nd solution add I 8 and I 16 as valid
    interleaving depths for RS
  • impacts TM channel coding blue book
  • impacts AOS blue book
  • need to use one of the 5 spare bits of the M-PDU
    header to have a 12-bit First Header Pointer
    (minor change).

22
Conclusion
  • 2nd solution (add I8 16) is our preferred
    solution
  • I16 provides near optimal performance in terms
    of power
  • improves significantly the suitability of CCSDS
    AOS and TM channel coding to high rate /
    powerbandwidth constrained systems
  • changes to existing books are minor but impact on
    existing AOS infrastructure is to be assessed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com