Title: Affecting Policy Change on a City Level
1Affecting Policy Change on a City Level
- Kenny Kwong, CSW
- Health Education Special Projects Manger
- Charles B. Wang Community Health Center
- 10th Anniversary APPEAL National
- Leadership Summit/Conference
- September 9-10, 2004
- Washington DC
2Affecting Policy Change on a City Level
- NYC Smoke Free Air Act 2002 - success,
celebrations, and challenges - What did NYC Coalition For a Smoke-Free City do?
- What did NYs AAPI Tobacco Control Network do?
- The Garbage Can Model
- My Reflection
3NYC Smoke Free Air Act of 2002
- Smoke-Free Successes, Celebrations and
Challenges - New Yorks Asian American
- Pacific Islander
- Tobacco Control Network
4Why The Law is Needed
- Tobacco use is the leading epidemic of our time
- More than 440,000 Americans die every year from
tobacco use - Each year in NYC, we lose 8,600 friends,
neighbors and family members to diseases caused
by smoking they die from lung cancer..heart
diseaseand more - 400 New Yorkers, who never smoked, die each year
from exposure to the tobacco smoke of others
5Secondhand Smoke and HealthThe Real Facts
- The EPA , the Surgeon General and the CDC agree
Secondhand smoke is a Class A carcinogen not
safe at any level like radon, asbestos and
benzene - Each year 60,000 non-smokers in the US die from
- breathing the smoke from other peoples
cigarettes - 1,000 of the victims are from our neighborhoods
- Secondhand smoke causes heart disease, asthma
- attacks, sinus and bronchial irritations,
especially in - children and seniors.
6Secondhand Smoke
- It causes cancerheart diseaselung disease and
death - 1 in 4 NYC smokers is forced to breathe this
poison on the job - Dont all workers deserve equal protections?
- Its About Our Rights to Breathe Clean Air!
7Intent of the Law
- An amendment to the 1995 NYC Smoke Free Air Act
- Protect ALL New York City workers from on-the-job
exposure to secondhand smoke - - Secondhand smoke is a known carcinogen,
- not safe at any level
- - All workers deserve a safe, clean,
- smoke-free workplace
8Who Will be Smoke-Free?
- All food service establishments, restaurants and
catering halls - All bars, including bars in restaurants
- Membership Associations
- All areas of theaters
- Banks, educational and health care facilities,
and child day care centers - Shopping malls and retail stores
- All offices
- Sports Arenas, roller ice rinks, billiard
parlors, bingo halls, bowling alleys and similar
places of recreation - Public transportation facilities, reception areas
and waiting rooms
9Goal to Support Strong, On-going Efforts in
Community Tobacco Control with
- The real facts on secondhand smoke
- How Smoke-Free Workplace laws are enacted
- Tobacco Industry opposition to Smoke-Free
Workplaces - Tools to win-back Smoke-free Communities
10Whos At Greatest Risk?
- More than 1million NYC workers like bartenders,
wait-staff whose jobs expose them to hours of
secondhand smoke - 1 working shift can smoking ½ pack of
cigarettes - Studies show that bartenders and waitresses have
a 50 greater chance of getting lung cancer than
other workers - NO ONE SHOULD HAVE TO BREATHE A KNOWN CARCINOGEN
IN ORDER TO KEEP - A JOB!
11(No Transcript)
12The Mayors Proposalto Protect ALL Workers
- According to Intro 256
- Smoke Free Workplace Act of 2002
- Smoking will not be permitted in
- Restaurants indoors, outdoors bars within
- All bars taverns
- Offices
- Lobbies
- Sports Arenas
- Places Smoking Permitted
- In your car
- In your home
- Many outdoor areas
13 How NYC Gets Smoke-Free Workplaces The
Political Process
- On August 12, 2002, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
Announced NYCs intention to go Smoke-Free! - Sponsors sought
- Proposal given to City Council Health Committee
- Health and community advocates meet with Health
Committee to educate them on the bills health
benefits
- The Health Committee holds public hearings on the
proposed legislation - Health advocates, workers and the community have
a chance to testify - The tobacco industry front groups will also
testify - Following public hearings, meetings with health
advocates and messages from constituents, the
Health Committee votes on the bill - Then, City Councils 51 members must vote on the
bill26 votes in favor are needed to win.
14The Tobacco Industry Fire Storm How Big
tobacco responds to the threat of new tobacco
control legislation
- Media The tobacco industry will use the media
to combat new tobacco control legislation - Community Groups The tobacco companies try to
buy community support through sponsorships,
incentives and payouts - Lobbying - The tobacco companies will use front
groups to lobby for support i.e. bodega
owners. They will contend that tobacco
legislation hurts businesses in poorer
communities - High Profile Spokespersons - The tobacco industry
will look for high profile spokespersons to
counter tobacco control legislation - FOIL The tobacco companies will look for legal
loopholes to sue organizations that work to enact
tobacco control legislation - Studies The tobacco companies pay medical and
health experts to produce documentation that
refutes tobacco use as a health risk
15Clean Indoor Air Myths Myth Busters
- Industry Myths
- Its a personal choice issue
- Restaurants and bars will lose business, people
will lose jobs - Restaurant and Bar workers can choose to work
elsewhere - State of the art ventilation systems can
effectively eliminate - secondhand smoke
- Myth Busters
- Its a health issue personal choice ends when it
harms others - Sales receipts from smoke-free communities show
no harm to businesses - The flexible hours in the hospitality industry
are the only jobs suitable for many workers - There is no know ventilation system that can
protect workers
16Opponents Say
- The do-gooders are winning out people who have
never had a fun time are trying to take all the
fun out of life Newsday 8/16 - Government regulations and lawsuits are
taking away everyones freedom NY Post 8/16 - Whats next fast food?
- People just like a smoke with their drink
- Newsday 8/16
- the anti-smoking agenda seems to be driven by
zealots. - Staten Island Advance 8/18
17Major Newspapers Say
- Ban Smoking in City Bars? Yes, for Healths
Sake THE NEW YORK TIMES Editorial 8/12 - there is no denying that in saying that
non-smoking bar and restaurant employees should
be protected from secondhand smoke, the
administration is on solid ground. STATEN ISLAND
ADVANCE 8/18 - Secondhand smoke is harmful and the proposition
that the ever-shrinking minority has a right to
inflict it on bartenders and other employees or
other patrons is increasingly difficult to
defend. CHICAGO TRIBUNE 8/29
- The City Council should rapidly enact Mayor
Michael Bloombergs plan to outlaw smoking in all
the citys workplaces on two simple grounds
Secondhand smoke is a threat to people who dons
smoke, and outlawing smoking has no adverse
economic effect. CRAINS NEW YORK BUSINESS
8/26-9/1 - A Complete ban on smoking in restaurants and
bars has proved not just practical, but also good
for business. Jane Brody, THE NEW YORK TIMES
8/27
18GET THE WORD OUT!
- Organize educate the community
- Help us find people to testify at hearings
- Place articles in community newsletters
- Help educate policy makers on the hazards of
secondhand smoke - Distribute our flyers
- (Training materials provided as needed)
19What Does NYs AAPI Tobacco Control Network Do
- Attended the Mayors Press Conference
- Mobilized the Asian communities to attend City
Council hearings to monitor the passage of the
law and show supports in the new legislations - Published news articles in ethnic-specific media
to increase community awareness - Published a letter to editor at New York Times
20What Does NYs AAPI Tobacco Control Network Do
- Translated and distributed a fact sheet
specifically developed for Asian American
Restaurant/Bar Owners and Employees - Translated an information booklet for the NYC
Department of Health on the NYC Smoke-Free Air
Act 2002 - Conducted educational sessions to inform
community members on the regulations of the
Smoke-Free Air Act - Co-sponsored panel discussions on the
implementation of the Smoke-Free Air Act
targeting business and restaurant owners in the
Chinese and Korean communities
21TAKE ACTION
- Sign Advocacy Petitions
- Sign postcards and mail them to City Council
- Call or visit your elected official
- - Tell them 73 of New Yorkers want smoke-free
workplaces - (a recent poll of 1,000 New Yorkers ½
with a smoking history ½ non-smokers, - showed that 73 supported smoke-free
workplaces - - Tell them 76 of NY State restaurant
owners want - smoke free restaurants (from a NY State
Restaurant Assoc. survey) - And most importantly, tell them that YOU want
smoke-free workplaces, too!
22Key Forces
- A Supportive Mayor and Health Commissioner
- Championship of City Council Health Chair,
Christine Quinn - Voices of diverse Communities
- Voices of Workers
23Current Public Acceptance Compliance
SFFAA Attitudes and Compliance Intercepts
May 1st May 20th 2003
- Polls show public in favor of law 2-1
- Compliance rates are high
Are you in favor of this new law that prohibits
smoking in all workplaces? Yes 65 No
21 Dont care/ no response 14
24Current Challenges
- Media - Doom and Gloom reporting
- Opposition tactics Doom and Gloom messaging
Cig Ban leaves lots of empties Deserted city
bars fall on hard times as biz drops off NY
Post 5/12/03
Cig ban killed him Bouncer knifed as he boots
smoker NY Post 4/14/03
Smoking Ban Clogs New York City Sidewalks
NY Newsday 5/03
Let's call Bloomberg's plot what it really is -
The SMOKER-Free City Act. Audrey Silk 8/26/02
25What We must Continue to Do
- I love Smoke-Free NY! Campaign
- Letters to the Editor
- Postcards
- Produce and Publish Real Data
26Where We Go from Here
Continued Support of Smoke-Free Legislation New
Challenges - Contraband cigarette sales to
minors - Smoke Free Homes - Cessation
27Historic Timeline
August 12th Mayor Proposes sweeping smoke-free
legislation. December 18th City Council votes
in favor of slightly amended bill, 44-7. December
30th Mayor Bloomberg signs the Smoke-Free Air
Act of 2002. March 26th - State passes new
sweeping statewide smoke-free legislation. March
30th City SFAA enacted. July 24th State law
goes into effect.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg
28Affecting Policy Change - What Model to Use
- Comprehensive Rational Decision Making Model
- Define goals clearly
- Set the levels of achievement of these goals
- Select many alternatives that might achieve these
goals - Compare alternatives systematically
- Assess costs and benefits of each alternative
- Choose the alternatives to achieve the goals at
the least cost - Does this ideal model accurately describe
reality?
29Affecting Policy Change - What Model to Use
- The Garbage Can Model
- Adapted from Cohen, March, and Olsen (1972) A
garbage can model of organizational choice.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
30The Garbage Can Model
- Organizations or Decision Structures
- Problems
- Solutions
- Participants
- Choice Opportunities
31The Garbage Can Model
- There is a kind of organization that
- is a collection of choices looking for
problems, issues and feelings looking for
decision situations in which they might be aired,
solutions looking for issues to which they might
be the answer, and decision makers looking for
work - Cohen, March, and Olsen (1972) A garbage can
model of organizational choice. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
32The Garbage Can Model
- The choice opportunity is thus a garbage can in
which various kinds of problems and solutions are
dumped by participants as they are generated. Mix
of garbage in a particular can depends on - The mix of other cans around
- Labels attached to the alternative cans
- What garbage is currently being produced
- How soon garbage is being collected or removed
from the scene
33The Garbage Can Model
- The flow of fairly separate streams of problems,
solutions, interaction among participants
available choices - Outcomes heavily depends on the coupling of the
streams such as coupling of solutions to problems
etc. - The change process is not necessarily incremental
34A Revised Garbage Can Model
- Federal government agenda settings
- Problems - recognition, attention
- Policies and Proposals - Bureaucrats, planning
staff, academics, interest groups, researchers - Politics national mood, public opinion,
election results, changes of administration,
lobbyists - John Kingdon (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and
Public Policies. Harper Collins Publishers
35A Revised Garbage Can Model
- Three streams of processes (problems, policies,
and politics) develop and operate largely
independently of one another, however, not
absolutely independent - Each of the actors and processes operate either
as an impetus or as constraints - The key to understanding agenda and policy change
is the coupling of these independent streams - Policy window - the conditions to push a given
subject higher on the policy agenda are right
is open for a short while, and then it closes - John Kingdon (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and
Public Policies. Harper Collins Publishers
36What do We Learn
- Facilitate the three streams of processes
arousing attention on problems, working closely
with policy makers, and dealing with politics - Manage the agenda setting process
- Assess impetus and constraints
- Build alliance and collaborate with partners
- Seize the policy window once it opens
- Be consistent and persistent, never give up
37Thank You!!
New Yorks Asian American Pacific Islander
Tobacco Control Network
Hundreds of community-based organizations and
advocacy groups