Title: VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects
1 VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects
- Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.)Program
Analyst - Program for Research Integrity Development and
Education (PRIDE)
2Overview
- Vulnerable Subjects
- Populations Considered Categorically Vulnerable
- Pregnant Women
- Prisoners
- Children
- Persons Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
- Surrogate Consent
2
3Vulnerable Subjects
- Common Rule
- When some or all of the subjects are likely to
be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence,
such as children, prisoners, pregnant women,
mentally disabled persons, or economically or
educationally disadvantaged persons, additional
safeguards have been included in the study to
protect the rights and welfare of these - 38 CFR 16.111(b)
3
4IRB Must Document Deliberations
- Reasons why IRB considers population or
individual to be vulnerable - That adequate safeguards protect the rights and
welfare of subjects likely to be vulnerable - That the VA criteria are met to approve inclusion
of individuals who lack decision-making capacity
4
5Individuals or Populations Which May Be
Temporarily or Permanently Vulnerable
- Those who are susceptible to coercion or undue
influence (e.g., homeless, students, patients
with limited treatment options, socially or
economically disadvantaged) - Those who lack comprehension of research or
potential risks (e.g., educationally
disadvantaged, dementia, schizophrenia,
depression)
5
6Individuals or Populations Which May Be
Temporarily or Permanently Vulnerable
- Those who have increased susceptibility to harm
(e.g., individuals answering questions about
traumatic events such as sexual assault, or
combat experiences) - Those who are at risk for physical,
psychological, economic, social, legal
consequences (e.g., Individuals answering
questions about drug use or HIV status)
6
7Research Involving Pregnant WomenVA Requirements
- Adequate provisions has been made to monitor risk
to subject and fetus - Women of child bearing potential may not be
entered into studies involving Category D or X
drugs without a waiver from the Chief Research
and Development Officer (CRADO)
7
8Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
- Prior studies must assess potential risks to
pregnant women and fetuses (preclinical studies,
clinical studies, studies on pregnant animals,
studies on non-pregnant women), when
scientifically appropriate - 45 CFR 46.204(a)
8
9Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
- Risk to the fetus is caused solely by
interventions or procedures that hold out the
prospect of direct benefit for the woman or the
fetus or, - If there is no such prospect of benefit
- the risk to the fetus is not greater than
minimal, and - the purpose of the research is the development of
important biomedical knowledge which cannot be
obtained by any other means 45 CFR
46.204(b)
9
10Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
- Any risk is the least possible for achieving the
objectives of the research 45 CFR
46.204(c) - If the research holds out the prospect of direct
benefit to the pregnant woman, the prospect of a
direct benefit both to the pregnant woman and the
fetus, or no prospect of benefit for the woman
nor the fetus when risk to the fetus is not
greater than minimal and the purpose of the
research is the development of important
biomedical knowledge that cannot be obtained by
any other means, the pregnant womans informed
consent is obtained in accord with the informed
consent provisions of 38 CFR 16.116 45 CFR
204(d)
10
11Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
- Subject is fully informed regarding the
reasonably foreseeable impact of the research on
the fetus - 45 CFR 46.204(f)
11
12Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
- No inducements, monetary or otherwise, are to be
offered to terminate a pregnancy 45 CFR 46.204
(h) - Individuals engaged in the research have no part
in - any decisions as to the timing, method, or
procedures used to terminate a pregnancy 45 CFR
46.204(i) - determining the viability of a fetus 45 CFR
46.204 (j)
12
13Research Involving Prisoners
- IRB Approval Must Comply 45 CFR 46, Subpart C
- Waiver from Chief of Research and Development
Officer (CRADO) - OHRP FAQs http//www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/populati
ons/index.html
13
14Research Involving PrisonersIncarceration During
Study
- Investigators must notify the IRB as soon as they
become aware that the subject has been
incarcerated - Investigator determines whether or not it is the
best interests of the subject to remain in the
study, or if the subject can be safely withdrawn
from the study - Continued participation is contingent on the
IRBs reviewing and approving such participation - Waiver must be obtained from the CRADO
- Follow all requirements (court, penal system,
local VA, Federal)
14
15 Research Involving ChildrenVA Requirements
- VA Research must support mission of VA and
enhance quality of health care delivery to
veterans - CRADO Waiver (see VHA Handbook 1200.05) must be
obtained to conduct VA research involving
children - Interventions
- Interactions
- Data or specimens
- Meet requirements of 45 CFR 46, Subpart D
15
16Research Involving Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
- Individual is presumed to have decision-making
capacity unless - Documented by a qualified practitioner in the
medical record - Ruled incompetent by a court of law
- If there is any question whether a potential
adult subject has decision-making capacity, the
investigator must consult with a qualified
practitioner about the individuals
decision-making capacity before proceeding with
the informed consent process - May be a qualified member of the research team
17Research Involving Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
- Individuals at high risk for temporary (e.g.,
head trauma) or fluctuating (e.g., schizophrenia)
lack of decision-making capacity must be
evaluated to determine the ability to provide
informed consent - Evaluation must be performed as described in the
IRB-approved protocol - If individual is deemed to lack decision-making
capacity, a legally authorized representative
(LAR) must provide informed consent - If subject regains decision-making capacity,
repeat informed consent process with subject, and
obtain subjects permission to continue
18Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
Risk, Harm, Direct Benefit of Proposed Research Additional Requirements
No greater than minimal risk No additional requirements
Some probability of harm Probability of direct benefit must be greater than probability of harm
Greater than minimal risk with no prospect of direct benefit to subject Research is likely to lead to generalizable knowledge about subjects disorder or condition that is of vital importance for understanding or amelioration of subjects disorder or condition
VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph 49(d)(1)(a), or
(b), or (c)
19Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
Type of Study Additional Requirements Example
Disorder leading to individuals lack of decision-making capacity is being studied whether or not the lack of decision-making itself is being evaluated The study cannot be performed with only persons who have decision-making capability Individual who lacks decision making capacity as the result of stroke can participate in study of cardiovascular effects of stroke
Also need VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph
49(d)(1)(a), or (b), or (c)
20Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
Type of Study Additional Requirements Example
Study is not directly related to individuals lack of decision-making capacity Compelling argument for including individuals who lack of decision-making capacity Study the transmission of MRSA infection in nursing home where both individuals with, and those without, decision making capacity are affected
Also need VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph
49(d)(1)(a), or (b), or (c)
21IRB Determinations for Research Involving Persons
Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
- Ensure the study includes appropriate procedures
for respecting dissent - Consider whether or not the study needs to
include procedures for obtaining assent - Determine whether any additional safeguards need
to be used (e.g., consent monitoring)
22IRB Determinations for Research Involving Persons
Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
- IRB must document
- Reasons why IRB considers subject to be
vulnerable - That adequate safeguards protect subjects
- VA criteria are met to approve include
individuals who lack decision-making capacity
23Surrogate Consent
- Legally Authorized Representative (LAR)
- Health care agent
- Legal or special guardian
- Next of kin in this order
- Spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent,
grandchild - Close friend
- LAR is not synonymous with HIPAAs personal
representative
24Surrogate Consent
- If feasible, the investigator must explain the
proposed research to the prospective research
subject - Some persons may resist participating in a
research (i.e., dissent) - Under no circumstances may a subject be forced or
coerced to participate in a research study even
if the LAR has provided consent - For subjects with fluctuating decision-making
capacity or those with decreasing capacity to
give consent, a re-consenting process with
surrogate consent may be necessary
24
25Key Points
- Understand who is categorically vulnerable
- Understand which individuals or populations may
be vulnerable - Understand the protections afforded to vulnerable
subjects in a study
25
26Key Points
- IRB must document
- Reasons why IRB considers to be vulnerable
- That adequate safeguards protect subjects
- VA criteria are met to approve include
individuals who lack decision-making capacity
26
27Key Points
- Protecting vulnerable populations is a shared
responsibility among - Investigators
- IRB
- Legally Authorized Representative
27
28QUESTIONS
28