Title: Joint Programmes Require Joint Forces: the Management Aspect
1Joint Programmes Require Joint Forces the
Management Aspect
BRIDGE PROJECT FINAL CONFERENCE
Francesco Girotti International Relations
Division, Bologna University JOIMAN projects
coordinator
18 October 2012, Malta
2STARTING POINTS
- Joint Programmes Integrated study programmes
offered by 2 or more institutions leading to the
award of a Double, Multiple or Joint Degree - JOIMAN focused on the Administration and
Management of JP - WHY?
- Because of the Erasmus Mundus impact
- Because of the nature of the network
- HOW?
- Surveys to JP coordinators (Master, Doctorate,
EUNonEU), study visits, international
conferences, papers, discussions, networks -
3JOIMAN FINDINGS AT A GLANCE
- 3 main messages
- There are different models of Joint Programmes,
with different levels of integration and
different impact on the planning, organisation
and management of the programmes themselves - Institutional strategy, support and commitment
are crucial for the implementation of Joint
Programmes - Being aware of the processes allows to think in
advance -
4MESSAGE 1 DIFFERENT MODELS
Joint Admnistration of students and ad hoc
services
Highest level of Integration (EM Model)
Joint QA measures
Common budget and tuition fees
Jointly developed curriculum (new, learning
outcomes based,)
Focus on international students
QA measures standards jointly agreed
Curriculum based on existing courses/
exploitation of excellences (Comparison of
learning outcomes)
Jointly agreed students services and standards
Based on own institution tuition policies
Focus on local students
Lowest level of Integration (Structured mobility
in Bilateral coop.)
Curriculum based on existing comparable courses
(input based)
5 MESSAGE 1 DIFFERENT MODELS (DOCTORATES)
  International collaboration Individual programmes Cotutelle Joint doctoral programme Joint doctoral degree and programme
Research    Â
Courses    Â
Structure of cooperation    Â
Selection/admission    Â
Supervision    Â
Defence    Â
Monitoring/reporting    Â
Employability    Â
Funding/fees    Â
Double or multiple degrees    Â
Joint degree    Â
5
6MESSAGE 1 DIFFERENT MODELS
- Positioning your joint programme in the
appropriate level of integration has a deep
impact on the management of the joint programme
itself. - I.E Large integrated consortium increase the
critical mass, share of resources and expertise,
increase the quality of the mobility offer BUT
more coordination efforts and costs (meetings,
staff mobility etc) more harmonization problems
(procedures, legislations, cultures) - I.E targeting international students more
chances to attract best students, creation of a
real international environment BUT more efforts
in marketing the programme, more efforts in the
ICT infrastructures, more efforts in services for
students etc
7MESSAGE 2 INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT
- Most common obstacles detected
- Legislation on joint degrees
- Institutional regulations
- Different Education Systems (length of study,
accreditation) - Tuition fees policies
- Funds and Human Resources
-
8WHY INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTMENT IS IMPORTANT?
- To prepare the ground through external actions
- To advocate changes at national level
- Developing a network-based strategy
- To prepare the ground through internal actions
- Creating appropriate structures for the
development and implementation of JP - Creating/adapting internal rules
- Coordinating the efforts of the many actors
involved - Providing funds for new initiatives
- Promoting the professional development of
administrators and academics involved - Fostering the initiatives of academics
9THIRD MESSAGE KNOW THE PROCESS AND THINK FIRST
- First action of the JOIMAN group has been the
definition of the processes in order to draft a
comprehensive questionnaire for JP coordinators. - Processes have been refined after the submission
of questionnaires and study visits. - This allowed us to draft a map which could be
useful and adaptable to any Joint Programme for
the planning of the management phase.
10WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE PROCESSES?
- Because most of the detected obstacles in the
management of Joint Programmes are at Programme
level and can be approached during the
development/negotiation phase - Lack of information on the educational systems of
the partners - Late involvement of key people
- Confusion in terminology
- Late definition of procedures for the
administration of students - Duplication of quality assurance requirement,
without a clear reflection on the harmonization
of the existing institutional procedures with
the needs of international dimension of the
programme - Late discussion on calendars, credits, thesis
procedures, certification, phd candidate
supervision etc
11Transversal processes
Students administration timeline
Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E M E A S U R E
S
F I N A N C I A L M A N A G E M E N T
Application
Promotion
Receipt of application
Quality in the application phase transparency
Selection round for non EU
Selection
Selection round for EU
Quality of the selection
Communication of results
Sharing of the budget
Admission
Visa procedures
Quality management tools
Management and distribution of fees
Enrolment
Enrolment procedures
Evaluation of teaching
Welcoming services
Management of scholarships
Welcoming
Language training
Evaluation of services
Cultural integration
Teaching
Reserves for sustainability
Academic Tutoring
Ex post evaluation students career
Preparation to the mobility
Transfer of students career
Accounting / reporting
Mobility
Tutoring of the mobility
Welcoming services
Ex post evaluation feedback from the labour
market
Cultural integration
Academic Tutoring
Transfer of students career
Overall evaluation of the programme
Dissertation
Joint jury
Diploma and DS
Joint signature or request of multiple diplomas
12(No Transcript)
13Tangible outputs
Good practice report on the management of JP
(Master EU-non EU and Doctorates)
- Annexes Cooperation agreement template,
Glossary, example of guidelines, national
legislations on tuition fees
Thematic papers
Contributions from international seminars
JOIMAN web site www.joiman.eu
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16HOW TO USE THE RESULTS
- Traditional way Reading
- (adapting concepts to different contexts,
adapting tools such as the cooperation agreement
template to our needs) - Innovative Way