Waltz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Waltz

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Randall W. Stone Last modified by: Dr. Steven D. Roper Created Date: 1/29/2003 8:00:06 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Randall137
Category:
Tags: crisis | power | waltz

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Waltz


1
Waltzs Neorealism
2
Balance of Power as a Reaction to a Threat
Napoleon, 1802-1815
Major Powers FRA, UK, RUS, PRUS, AUS
After French Revolution (1789), Napoleon
Bonaparte rises to power. -- Consul (1802) --
Emperor of France (1804) Continues military
campaigns to build empire and feed war machine.
-- Poses major threat to Europe
UK, RUS, PRUS, AUS form coalitions against FRA
-- Napoleon defeated (1814) -- Congress of
Vienna (1814) -- Napoleon returns (1815) --
Waterloo (1815)
3
BoP as a Peaceful Equilibrium Concert of
Europe, 1815-1848
After Napoleonic Wars, Congress of Vienna
continues (1815) Defeated France let back into
club Quadruple Alliance Austria,
Britain, Prussia, Russia Congresses held to
attempt to resolve issues. Buffer
states/territory traded.
4
Bipolarity vs Multipolarity
1792
1815
1854
1866
1870
1914
1939
Napoleonic Wars
Crimean War
Franco-Prussian War
WW I
WW II
(peaceful)
Concert of Europe
Austro-Prussian War
Multipolar loose, shifting alliances, Britain as
balancer four or five Great Powers
1945
1990
Cold Waror Long Peace
?
Bipolar (two Great Powers, tight blocs)
5
Bipolarity vs Multipolarity
  • Internal balancing is more reliable
  • External balancing can give rise to
    miscalculations that lead to general war
  • Large influence of small allies
  • Deterrence fails because there is an incentive to
    defect from commitments
  • As numbers grow, strategic complexity grows
    geometrically
  • Uncertainty is the leading cause of war

6
Structural Theories WWI
Multipolar System
  • Abandoning an ally invites ones own destruction
  • In a moment of crisis, the weaker or more
    adventurous party (Austria) is likely to
    determine its sides policy
  • Its partners (Germany) can afford neither to let
    the weaker member be defeated nor to advertise
    their disunity by failing to back a venture even
    while deploring its risks

7
Structural Theories WWI
Balance of Power
  • The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance were
    approximately balanced
  • The defeat of any great power would give the
    opposing coalition a decisive advantage in the
    overall European balance of power
  • Britain entered the war to prevent Germany from
    upsetting the balance of power on the continent

8
Structural Theories WWI
Alliance System
  • The establishment of the Triple Entente and the
    Triple Alliance divided the European powers into
    two camps
  • While seen as a form of self-protection, the
    alliances also had the potential to escalate
    small crises into major wars
  • When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, this
    brought Serbias ally Russia into the war, which
    brought Germany, France, and Britain into the war

9
Strengths of Structural Realism
  • Parsimony
  • Focus on systemic effects
  • Power is defined as capabilities
    (non-tautological)
  • Explanatory power is in the constraints, not in
    the preferences
  • Collective action
  • Probabilistic predictions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com