Radiocarbon Calibration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiocarbon Calibration

Description:

Radiocarbon Calibration By Jonathan Chacon ESS 433 14November2007 Fairbanks et. al. 2005 Paired radiocarbon and 230Th/ 234U/ 238U ages determined on coral samples ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: coursesWa1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiocarbon Calibration


1
Radiocarbon Calibration
  • By Jonathan Chacon
  • ESS 433
  • 14November2007

2
Fairbanks et. al. 2005
  • Paired radiocarbon and 230Th/ 234U/ 238U ages
    determined on coral samples help extend
    radiocarbon calibration curve (RCCC) from 12k-50k
    yr BP
  • Tree-ring dating calibration 0-12k yr BP (Reimer
    et. al. 2004)

3
Reimer et. al. 2004
  • Discusses calibration data for Northern
    Hemisphere C14 using tree-ring measurements 0-12k
    BP
  • www.radiocarbon.org

4
Fairbanks
  • Extended TRC by using coral reef cores from
    Barbados (Atlantic), Kiritimati Atoll (CenPac),
    and Araki Is. (WesPac)
  • Accurate calibration essential for measuring time
    and rates of change for numerous scientific fields

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Fairbanks cont.
  • (CO2)14 produced by cosmic rays in atmosphere,
    mixes in troposphere and exchanges w/ reactive C
    reservoirs of ocean and biosphere, where it
    decays
  • THUS the use of coral core samples!

8
Fairbanks cont.
  • Existing RCC data sets infer calendar ages based
    on interpolations and correlations of local
    climate proxies in deep sea cores to chronologies
    of ice core proxies, or assumptions about
    sedimentation rates.

9
Fairbanks Methodology
  • Require that each data point has measured
    calendar age (230Th/ 234U/ 238U) and RC age w/
    known errors independent of each other
  • Other studies not included b/c they use samples
    w/ 1-5 calcite, which corrupts RC data
  • Fairbanks -0.2 calcite samples

10
RC Age Calibration
  • All RC ages are readily subject to contamination
    by modern C during sample handling and processing
  • 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and 14C ages have independent
    errors measured, computed, and accounted for

11
Accuracy and Precision
  • Tested by
  • a.) measuring samples that overlap TRC
  • b.) making paired 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and
    231Pa/235Uages on select samples
  • c.) through 230Th/ 234U/ 238U, 231 Pa/235U, and
    14C measurements in laboratory calibration samples

12
230Th/ 234U/ 238U
  • Abundance determined by Thermal Ionization Mass
    Spectrometry (TIMS) opened wide range of dating
    applications
  • New half-life estimates for 230Th and 234U
  • Improvements made to sample pretreatment quality
    control

13
Advantages to Fairbanks
  • Quality of coral samples combined w/ high
    precision 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and 14C measurements
  • Goal 3 yrs make 400 new 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and
    14C to fill in gaps of RCC 0-50k BP w/ samples of
    100 yr resolution or better
  • Rigorous error estimation!

14
Quality Control
  • lt0.2 calcite most important screening
    criteria, uses X-ray Diffraction
  • 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and 231Pa/235U ages determined
    by Multi-Collector Magnetic Sector double
    focusing Inductively Coupled Mass Spectrometer
    (MC-MS-ICPMS) w/ age uncertainty of 0.5!

15
AAAAGGGGHHH!!!
16
More Methodology
  • No benefit to amalgamating subsets of calibration
    pts. from other data sets b/c dramatic increase
    in scatter
  • 10-29k BP all pristine coral samples
    exclusively from marine environments
  • Consistency of screening, handling, analysis, and
    precision of measurements justify stand-alone
    CC

17
Fairbanks to Reimer
  • Fairbanks CC overlaps w/ existing TRCC and extend
    calibration to 50k BP
  • Paired 230Th/ 234U/ 238U and 14C age
    determinations fr. pristine corals provide, high
    precision/accuracy RCCC for use beyond superior
    TRCC

18
Reimer
  • Tree Ring Data Sets
  • Random Walk Model (RWM) account of uncertainty
    in calendar and 14C age to calculate underlying CC

19
IntCal04
  • Group that established criteria for acceptance of
    data into calibration set
  • Tree ring measurements used 0-12.4k BP, marine
    data 12.4-26k BP
  • www.radiocarbon.org

20
Tree Ring Data Sets (0-12.4k BP)
  • Dendrochronological dating and cross-checking
    tree rings is required
  • Rigorous testing by internal replication of many
    overlapping sections
  • Heidelberg Data Set
  • Belfast Data Set
  • Waikato Data Set
  • Seattle Data Set
  • Pretoria and Groningen Data Sets
  • Arizona Data Set

21
Regional Offsets
  • Trees assumed to have sampled well-mixed
    atmosphere
  • -lat-dependent diffs in ocean area, surface water
    ages, and wind speeds cause 14C offsets of 1 (8
    14C yr) for most of the Northern Hemisphere with
    the exception of the high Arctic
  • - growing season diffs, altitudinal effects,
    melting permafrost, proximity to areas of intense
    ocean upwelling, and volcanic emissions -gt
    significant in certain localities and time periods

22
Sources of Uncertainty
  • Counting statistics -gt standard deviation in 14C
    age difference of replicate samples (mathematical
    process)
  • Others may be the result of differences in
    sampling, sample pretreatment, or laboratory
    operation, which are difficult to quantify for
    individual samples

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Data Collection
  • For comparison purposes, calculated a weighted
    avg of all updated tree-ring C14 measurements
    w/in a 10 year window
  • RWM assumes equal rise/fall in atmospheric 14C
    levels

26
Reimer Conclusions
  • -b/c RWM accounts for scatter around true
    calibration curve, IntCal04 curve is smoother
    than the tree-ring-derived portion of IntCal98
    (0-11440k BP)

27
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com