Title: Chapter 14 Mental Health Services: Legal and Ethical Issues
1Chapter 14 Mental Health Services Legal and
Ethical Issues
2Mental Health and the Legal System An Overview
- Mental Health and the Legal System
- Guided by ethical principles and state and
federal laws - Shifting Perspectives on Mental Health Law
- Liberal era (1960 to 1980) Rights of persons
with mental illness dominated - Neoconservative era (1980 to present)
Emphasized limiting rights of mentally ill - The Issues
- The nature of civil vs. criminal commitment
- Balancing ethical considerations vs. legal
considerations - The role of psychologists in legal matters
- Rights of patients and research subjects
- Practice standards and the changing face of
mental health care
3Civil Commitment Overview, Criteria, and
Oversight Authority
- Civil Commitment Laws
- Address legal declaration of mental illness
- Address when a person can be placed in a hospital
or institution for treatment - Such laws and what constitutes mental illness
vary by state - General Criteria for Civil Commitment
- Demonstrate that a person has a mental illness
and needs treatment - Show that the person is dangerous to self or
others - Establish a grave disability Inability to care
for self - Governmental Authority Over Civil Commitment
- Police power Protection of the health, welfare,
and safety of society - Parens patriae State acts a surrogate parent
4The Civil Commitment Process
- Initial Stages
- Person fails to seek help, but others feel that
help is needed - Petition is made to a judge on the behalf of the
person - Individual in question must be notified of the
civil commitment process - Subsequent Stages
- Involve normal legal proceedings in most cases
- Determination is made by a judge regarding
whether to commit the person
5The Concept of Mental Illness in Civil Commitment
Proceedings
- Defining Mental Illness
- Is a legal concept, referring to severe thought
or behavioral disturbances - Not synonymous with a psychological disorder
(DSM) - Definitions of mental illness vary by state
- Mental retardation and substance-related
disorders often are excluded - Dangerousness to Self or Others Central to
Commitment Proceedings - Assessing dangerousness The role of mental
health professionals - Knowns and unknowns about violence and mental
illness
6Problems with the Process of Civil Commitment
- Early Supreme Court Rulings Restrictions Over
Involuntary Commitment - A nondangerous person cannot be committed
- Need for treatment alone is not enough
- Having a grave disability is insufficient
- Consequences of Supreme Court Rulings
- Criminalization of the mentally ill
- Increase in homelessness
- Deinstitutionalization Closure of several large
psychiatric hospitals - Transinstitutionalization Movement of mentally
ill to community care - More Liberal Changes in Civil Commitment
Procedures Followed
7Subsequent Modification to Civil Commitment
Procedures
- Civil Commitment Criteria Were Broadened
- Involuntary commitment for dangerous and
non-dangerous persons - Involuntary commitment for persons in need of
treatment - National Alliance of the Mental Ill argued for
further reforms
8Criminal Commitment An Overview
- Nature of Criminal Commitment
- Accused of committing a crime
- Detainment in a mental health facility for
evaluation of fitness to stand trial - Found guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity
9The Insanity Defense
- Nature of the Insanity Defense Plea
- Legal statement by the accused of not guilty
because of insanity at time of crime - Results in defendant going to a treatment
facility rather than a prison - Diagnosis of a disorder is not the same as
insanity - Definitions of Insanity
- MNaughten rule Insanity defense originated
with this ruling - Durham rule More inclusive, involving mental
disease or defect - ALI Standard Knowledge of right vs. wrong,
self-control, and diminished capacity
10Consequences of the Insanity Defense
- Public Misperceptions and Outrage
- John Hinckley Jr. found not guilty by reason of
insanity (NGRI) - 50 of states subsequently considered abolishing
the insanity defense - Public views Insanity defense is a legal
loophole - Facts About the Insanity Defense
- Used in less than 1 of criminal cases
- Persons judged NGRI spend more time in mental
hospitals than in jail - Changes Regarding the Insanity Defense
- Insanity Defense Reform Act Movement back to
MNaughten-like standards - Guilty but mentally ill (GBMI) Allows for
treatment and punishment
11Determination of Competence to Stand Trial
- Requirements for Competence
- Understanding of legal charges
- Ability to assist in ones own defense
- Essential for trial or legal processes
- Burden of proof is on the defense
- Consequences of a Determination of Incompetence
- Loss of decision-making authority
- Results in commitment, but with limitations
12Mental Health Professionals as Expert Witnesses
- The Expert Witness Psychologists Role
- Person with specialized knowledge and expertise
- Evaluate imminent dangerousness (to a limited
extent) - Assist in making reliable DSM diagnoses
- Advise the court regarding psychological
assessment and diagnosis - Assess malingering (i.e., faking symptoms)
- Assist in competency determinations
13Patients Rights An Overview
- The Right to Treatment
- Mentally ill persons cannot be committed
involuntarily without treatment - Treatment includes active efforts to reduce
symptoms and provide humane care - The Right to the Least Restrictive Alternative
- Treatment within the least confining and limiting
environment - The Right to Refuse Treatment
- Often in cases involving medical or drug
treatment - Persons cannot be forced to become competent via
taking antipsychotic medication - The Right to Confidentiality vs. Duty to Warn
- Confidentiality Protection of disclosure of
personal information - Tarasoff and the Duty to Warn One of several
limits on confidentiality
14Research Participant Rights An Overview
- The Right to be Informed About the Research
- Involves informed consent, not simply consent
alone - The Right to Privacy
- Right to be Treated with Respect and Dignity
- Right to be Protected from Physical and Mental
Harm - Right to Chose or to Refuse to Participate in
Research Without Negative Consequences - Right to Anonymity with Regard to Reporting of
Study Findings - Right to Safeguarding of Records
15Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards
- Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
- Focus on delivery of efficient and cost-effective
mental health services - Dissemination of relevant state-of-the-art
information to practitioners - Establish clinical practice guidelines for
assessment and treatment - American Psychological Associations Practice
Guidelines - Standards for clinical efficacy research
- Standards for clinical effectiveness research
16Summary of Ethical and Legal Issues in Mental
Health Services
- Society Views and Laws About Mental Illness
Change with Time - Mental Illness Is a Legal Term, Not a
Psychological Term - Civil Commitment Is a Legal Processes Involving
Involuntary Commitment - Criminal Commitment Involves Criminal Behavior
and Mental Illness - Determination of competence, insanity, and
criminal culpability - Role of Mental Health Professionals in Legal
Matters - Rights of Patients, Research Subjects, and the
Future of Mental Health Care