Charter Schools in the Local Context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Charter Schools in the Local Context

Description:

Title: TOPIC #10: CHARTER SCHOOLS: A BLOCK AGAINST? Or: A STEP TOWARD THE PRIVATIZING OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS? Author: Bud Mehan Last modified by: Bud Mehan – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: BudM5
Learn more at: https://create.ucsd.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Charter Schools in the Local Context


1
Charter Schools in the Local Context
  • EDS/Soc 126 Topic 10 Part 2

2
Some Quick Facts about Charters in San Diego
  • 35 charters
  • 13,000 students (10 of SDUSD)
  • 30 of 35 South of 8
  • Notables
  • KIPP
  • High Tech Hi
  • King-Chavez
  • UCSD Partnerships with Preuss, Gompers

3
Dimensions of Reform
  • Structural/Technical Changes--add resources, such
    as equipment, teachers, modify school day, class
    size, school size (Gates)
  • Cultural Changes--address educators, citizens
    beliefs about reasons for performance (race,
    ethnicity, gender) (Oakes, Turning Points)
  • Political--mobilize constituencies to assist with
    change effort (civil rights struggles)
  • Some Reform Efforts deploy only one others lead
    with one, activate the others
  • Question Which theory of action do charters
    use?

4
Goals/Purposes of Charters
  • Possibilities
  • Increase parental choice level the playing
    field--participate in contest mobility system
    (Turner)
  • Develop a critical consciousness among youth
    through critical pedagogy (Nash)
  • Actualities Increase parental choice level the
    playing field--participate in contest mobility
    system (Turner)

5
Reminder Advocates CLAIM Charter Schools
  • Reduce bureaucracy
  • Stimulate competition among public
    schools--public schools will improve or close
  • Improve students academic performance
  • Are more innovative than public schools
  • Will be held accountable

6
EVIDENCE about CLAIM that SD Charters Reduce
Bureaucracy
  • San Diego Charters, like all charters do report
    about compliance with State and federal laws,
    standards and accountability (annual API scores)
  • San Diego charters can and do hire teachers
    locally (local control vs. tenure/union issue)

7
EVIDENCE _at_ CLAIM that SD Charters Stimulate
Competition
  • Like the national situation, very little evidence
  • Local case Lincoln HS attempts to adopt Preuss
    practices of modified block schedule, on-site
    teacher professional development
  • Constraints SDEA rules and regulations

8
EVIDENCE _at_ CLAIM that SD Charters Innovate
  • Preuss/Gompers Based on research on schooling
    and cognitive development
  • Universal development (CicourelMehan)
  • Detracking rigorous curriculum scaffolds
    (AlvarezMehan)
  • HTH Based on Dewey/Meierinquiry and
    project-based learning

9
Preuss/Gompers Theory of Action
  • Structural
  • Only college prep track
  • Longer school day, week, year
  • Advisory periods
  • Teacher Professional development in school day
  • Range of assessments-portfolios, exhibitions

10
Preuss/Gompers Theory of Action
  • Cultural
  • GCMS Culture Camp to instill common high
    expectations, predictability
  • College teams
  • signs, banners, uniforms to signal college going
    culture
  • UCSD students serve as tutors, role models

11
Preuss/Gompers Theory of Action
  • Political
  • UCSD Contentious debate led to CREATE Preuss
  • Gompers Also contentious Activist parents
    Supt community groups led to charter

12
Other Local Innovations HTH, KIPP
  • Range of academic calendar (zero periods,
    contracts, periods of varying, longer school
    year)
  • Local personnel decisions
  • Embed teacher professional development in school
    day
  • Project based learning (hands-on, tie students
    experience to disciplinary concepts)
  • Range of assessmentsnot just standardized
    testsincluding portfolios, exhibitions
  • HTH offers teaching credential!

13
EVIDENCE _at_ CLAIM that SD Charters
ImprovePerformance
  • Preuss 4-year College Enrollment
  • 2004 80 (N55)
  • 2005 84 (N75)
  • 20O6 78 (N87)
  • 2007 87 (N78)
  • 2008 87 (N87)
  • 2009 93 (N93)
  • Preuss State-wide Tests (API)
  • 2004 2nd in County (844)
  • 2005 1st in County (861)
  • 2006 2nd in County (879)
  • 2007 1st in County (877)
  • 2008 1st in County (881)
  • 2009 1st in County (894)

GCMS
14
EVIDENCE _at_ CLAIM that SD Charters
ImprovePerformance
  • School 2007API 2008API
  • Preuss 877 881
  • HiTechHi 807 785
  • SDHS IB 783 800
  • SDHSLEADS 637 717
  • CfordIDEA 570 573
  • Hoover 562 578
  • Lincoln n/a 540

15
EVIDENCE _at_ CLAIM that SD Charters
ImprovePerformance
  • School 2007API 2008API
  • Preuss 877 881
  • TorreyPines 852 849
  • La Jolla Hi 829 818
  • HiTechHi 807 785
  • Scripps 785 820
  • Pt Loma 672 709

16
Summary
  • Local Charters have better record than US
    average
  • Bureaucracy
  • Competition
  • Student achievement
  • Educate all students? Or promote more segregation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com