Visualization and Data Mining techniques - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Visualization and Data Mining techniques

Description:

Visualization and Data Mining techniques By- Group number- 14 Chidroop Madhavarapu(105644921) Deepanshu Sandhuria(105595184) Data Mining CSE 634 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: Jiawe3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Visualization and Data Mining techniques


1
Visualization and Data Mining techniques
  • By-
  • Group number- 14
  • Chidroop Madhavarapu(105644921)
  • Deepanshu Sandhuria(105595184)
  • Data Mining CSE 634
  • Prof. Anita Wasilewska

2
References
  • http//coblitz.codeen.org3125/citeseer.ist.psu.ed
    u/cache/papers/cs/10335/ftpzSzzSzftp.cs.umn.eduzS
    zdeptzSzuserszSzkumarzSzdatavis.pdf/ganesh96visual
    .pdf
  • http//www.ailab.si/blaz/predavanja/ozp/gradivo/20
    02-Keim-Visualization20in20DM-IEEE20Trans20Vis
    .pdf
  • http//www.geocities.com/anand_palm/
  • http//citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/27216/
    httpzSzzSzwww-users.cs.umn.eduzSzzCz7EctluzSzPape
    rTalkFilezSzits02.pdf/shekhar02cubeview.pdf
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/Research/shashi-group/
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/Research/shashi-group/Book/s
    db-chap1.pdf
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/research/shashi-group/alan_p
    lanb.pdf
  • http//coblitz.codeen.org3125/citeseer.ist.psu.ed
    u/cache/papers/cs/27637/httpzSzzSzwww-users.cs.um
    n.eduzSzzCz7EpushengzSzpubzSzkdd2001zSzkdd.pdf/she
    khar01detecting.pdf

3
Motivation
  • Visualization for Data Mining
  • Huge amounts of information
  • Limited display capacity of output devices
  • Visual Data Mining (VDM) is a new approach for
  • exploring very large data sets, combining
    traditional
  • mining methods and information visualization
    techniques.

4
Why Visual Data Mining
5
Why Visual Data Mining
6
VDM Approach
  • VDM takes advantage of both,
  • The power of automatic calculations, and
  • The capabilities of human processing.
  • Human perception offers phenomenal abilities to
    extract structures from pictures.

7
Levels of VDM
  • No or very limited integration
  • Corresponds to the application of either
    traditional information
  • visualization or automated data mining
    methods.
  • Loose integration
  • Visualization and automated mining methods are
    applied sequentially.
  • The result of one step can be used as input for
    another step.
  • Full integration
  • Automated mining and visualization methods
    applied in parallel.
  • Combination of the results.

8
Methods of Data Visualization
  • Different methods are available for visualization
    of data
  • based on type of data
  • Data can be
  • Univariate
  • Bivariate
  • Multivariate

9
Univariate data
  • Measurement of single quantitative variable
  • Characterize distribution
  • Represented using following methods
  • Histogram
  • Pie Chart

10
Histogram
11
Pie Chart
12
Bivariate Data
  • Constitutes of paired samples of two quantitative
    variables
  • Variables are related
  • Represented using following methods
  • Scatter plots
  • Line graphs

13
Scatter plots
14
Line graphs
15
Multivariate Data
  • Multi dimensional representation of multivariate
    data
  • Represented using following methods
  • Icon based methods
  • Pixel based methods
  • Dynamic parallel coordinate system

16
Icon based Methods
17
Pixel Based Methods
  • Approach
  • Each attribute value is represented by one
    colored pixel (the value ranges of the attributes
    are mapped to a fixed color map).
  • The values of each attribute are presented in
    separate sub windows.
  • Examples
  • Dense Pixel Displays

18
Dense Pixel Display
  • Approach
  • Each attribute value is represented by one
    colored pixel (the value ranges of the attributes
    are mapped to a fixed color map).
  • Different attributes are presented in separate
    sub windows.

19
Visual Data Mining Framework and Algorithm
Development
  • Ganesh, M., Han, E.H., Kumar, V., Shekar, S.,
  • Srivastava, J. (1996).
  • Working Paper. Twin Cities, MN University of
    Minnesota,
  • Twin Cities Campus.

20
References
  • http//coblitz.codeen.org3125/citeseer.ist.psu.ed
    u/cache/papers/cs/10335/ftpzSzzSzftp.cs.umn.eduzS
    zdeptzSzuserszSzkumarzSzdatavis.pdf/ganesh96visual
    .pdf
  • http//www.ailab.si/blaz/predavanja/ozp/gradivo/20
    02-Keim-Visualization20in20DM-IEEE20Trans20Vis
    .pdf
  • http//www.geocities.com/anand_palm/

21
Abstract
  • VDM refers to refers to the use of visualization
    techniques in Data Mining process to
  • Evaluate
  • Monitor
  • Guide
  • This paper provides a framework for VDM via the
    loose coupling of databases and visualization
    systems.
  • The paper applies VDM towards designing new
    algorithms that can learn decision trees by
    manually refining some of the decisions made by
    well known algorithms such as C4.5.

22
Components of VQLBCI
  • The three major components of VQLBCI are Visual
    Representations, Computations and Events.

23
Visual Development of Algorithms
  • Most interesting use of visual data mining is the
    development of new insights and algorithms.
  • The figure below shows the ER diagram for
    learning classification decision trees.
  • This model allows the user to monitor the quality
    and impact of decisions made by the learning
    procedure.
  • Learning procedure can be refined interactively
    via a visual interface.

24
ER diagram for the search space of decision tree
learning algorithm
25
General Framework
  • Learning a classification decision tree from a
    training data set can be regarded as a process of
    searching for the best decision tree that meets
    user-provided goal constraints.
  • The problem space of this search process consists
    of Model Candidates, Model Candidate Generator
    and Model Constraints.
  • Many existing classification-learning algorithms
    like C4.5 and CDP fit nicely within this search
    framework. New learning algorithms that fit
    users requirements can be developed by defining
    the components of the problem space.

26
General Framework
  • Model Candidate corresponds to the partial
    classification decision tree. Each node of the
    decision tree is a Model Atom
  • Search process is the process of finding a final
    model candidate such that it meets user goal
    specifications.
  • Model Candidate Generator transforms the current
    model candidate into a new model candidate by
    selecting one model atom to expand from the
    expandable leaf model atoms.
  • Model Constraints (used by Model Candidate
    Generator) provide controls and boundaries to the
    search space.

27
Search Process
28
Acceptability Constraint
  • Model Constraints consist of Acceptability
    constraints, Expandability constraints and a
    Data-Entropy calculation function.
  • Acceptability constraint predicate specifies when
    a model candidate is acceptable and thus allows
    search process to stop. EX
  • A1) Total no of expandable leaf model atoms 0.
  • A2) Overall error rate of the model candidate lt
    acceptable error rate.
  • A3) Total number of model atoms in the model
    candidategt maximal allowable tree size.
  • A1 is used in C4.5 and CDP

29
Expandability Constraint
  • An Expandability constraint predicate specifies
    whether a leaf model atom is expandable or not.
    EX
  • C4.5 uses E1 and E2
  • CDP uses E2 and E3

30
Traversal Strategy
  • Traversal strategy ranks expandable leaf model
    atoms based on the model atom attributes. EX
  • Increasing order of depth
  • Decreasing order of depth
  • Orders based on other model atom attributes.

31
Steps in Visual Algorithm Development
  • No single algorithm is the best all the time,
    performance is highly data dependent.
  • By changing different predicates of model
    constraints, users can construct new
    classification-learning algorithm.
  • This enables users to find an algorithm that
    works the best on a given data set.
  • Two algorithms are developed BF based on Best
    First search idea and CDP which is a
    modification of CDP

32
BF
  • This algorithm is based on the Best-First search
    idea.
  • For Acceptability criteria, it includes A1 and A2
    with a user specified acceptable error rate.
  • The Traversal strategy chosen is T3
  • In Best-First, expandable leaf model atoms are
    ranked according to the decreasing order of the
    number of misclassified training cases. (local
    error rate size of subset training data set)
  • The traversal strategy will expand a model atom
    that has the most misclassified training cases,
    thus reducing the overall error rate the most.

33
CDP
  • CDP is a modification of CDP
  • CDP has dynamic pruning using expandability
    constraint E3.
  • Here, the depth is modified according to the size
    of the training data set of the model atom.
  • We set
  • B is the branching factor of the decision tree, t
    is the size of training data set belonging to
    model atom, T is the whole training data set.

34
Comparison of different classification learning
algorithms
35
Experiment
  • The new BF and CDP algorithms are compared with
    the C4.5 and CDP algorithms.
  • Various metrics are selected to compare the
    efficiency, accuracy and size of final decision
    trees of the classification algorithm.
  • The generation efficiency of the nodes is
    measured in terms of the total number of nodes
    generated.
  • To compare accuracy of the various algorithms,
    the mean classification error on the test data
    sets have been computed.

36
Classification error for 10 data sets
37
Nodes generated for 10 data sets
38
Final decision tree size
39
Results/Conclusion
  • CDP has accuracy comparable to C4.5 while
    generating considerably fewer nodes.
  • CDP has accuracy comparable to C4.5 while
    generating considerably fewer nodes.
  • CDP outperformed CDP in error rate and number of
    nodes generated.
  • Considering all performance metrics together,
    CDP is the best overall algorithm.
  • Considering classification accuracy alone, C4.5P
    is the winner.

40
Conclusion
  • Different datasets require different algorithms
    for best results.
  • Diverse user requirements put different
    constraints on the final decision tree.
  • The experiment shows that Interactive Visual Data
    Mining Framework can help find the most suitable
    algorithm for a given data set and group of user
    requirements.

41
Data Mining for Selective Visualization of Large
Spatial Datasets
  • Proceedings of 14th IEEE International Conference
    on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
  • (ICTAI'02),  2002.
  • Washington (November 2002), DC, USA,
  • Shashi Shekhar, Chang-Tien Lu, Pusheng Zhang,
    Rulin Liu
  • Computer Science Engineering Department
  • University of Minnesota

42
References
  • http//citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/27216/
    httpzSzzSzwww-users.cs.umn.eduzSzzCz7EctluzSzPape
    rTalkFilezSzits02.pdf/shekhar02cubeview.pdf
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/Research/shashi-group/
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/Research/shashi-group/Book/s
    db-chap1.pdf
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/research/shashi-group/alan_p
    lanb.pdf
  • http//coblitz.codeen.org3125/citeseer.ist.psu.ed
    u/cache/papers/cs/27637/httpzSzzSzwww-users.cs.um
    n.eduzSzzCz7EpushengzSzpubzSzkdd2001zSzkdd.pdf/she
    khar01detecting.pdf

43
Basic Terminology
  • Spatial databases
  • Alphanumeric data geographical cordinates
  • Spatial mining
  • Mining of spatial databases
  • Spatial datawarehouse
  • Contains geographical data
  • Spatial outliers
  • Observations that appear to be inconsistent with
    the remainder of that set of data

44
Spatial Cluster
45
Contribution
  • Propose and implement the CubeView visualization
    system
  • General data cube operations
  • Built on the concept of spatial data warehouse to
    support data mining and data visualization
  • Efficient and scalable spatial outlier detection
    algorithms

46
Challenges in spatial data mining
  • Classical data mining - numbers and categories.
  • Spatial data
  • more complex and
  • extended objects such as points, lines and
    polygons.
  • Second, classical data mining works with explicit
    inputs, whereas spatial predicates and attributes
    are often implicit.
  • Third, classical data mining treats each input
    independently of other inputs.

47
Application Domain
  • The Traffic Management Center - Minnesota
    Department of Transportation (MNDOT) has a
    database to archive sensor network.
  • Sensor network includes
  • about nine hundred stations
  • each of which contains one to four loop detector
  • Measurement of Volume and occupancy.
  • Volume is vehicles passing through station in
    5-minute interval
  • Occupancy is percentage of time station is
    occupied with vehicles

48
Basic Concepts
  • Spatial Data Warehouse
  • Spatial Data Mining
  • Spatial Outliers Detection

49
Spatial Data Warehouse
  • Employs data cube structure
  • Outputs - albums of maps.
  • Traffic data warehouse
  • Measures - volume and occupancy
  • Dimensions - time and space.

50
Spatial Data Mining
  • Process of discovering interesting and useful but
    implicit spatial patterns.
  • key goal is to partially automate knowledge
    discovery
  • Search for nuggets of information embedded in
    very large quantities of spatial data.

51
Spatial Outliers Detection
  • Suspiciously deviating observations
  • Local instability
  • Each Station
  • Spatial attributes time, space
  • Non spatial attributes volume, occupancy

52
Basic Structure CubeView
53
CubeView Visualization System
  • Each node in cube a visualization style
  • S - Traffic volume of station at all times.
  • TTD Time of the day
  • TDW Day of the week
  • STTD Daily traffic volume of each station
  • TTD TDWS Traffic volume at each station at
    different times on different days

54
Dimension Lattice
55
CubeView Visualization System
56
CubeView Visualization System
57
CubeView Visualization System
58
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
  • Problem Definition
  • Given a spatial graph G S , E
  • S - s1, s2, s3, s4..
  • E edges (neighborhood of stations)
  • f ( x ) - attribute value for a data record
  • N ( x )- fixed cardinality set of neighbors of x
  • ) - Average attribute value of x
    neighbors
  • S( x ) - difference of the attribute value of
    each data object and the average attribute value
    of neighbors.

59
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
  • Problem Definition cont
  • S( x ) - difference of the attribute value of
    each data object and the average attribute value
    of neighbors.
  • Test for detecting an outlier
  • confidence level threshold ?

60
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
  • Few points
  • First, the neighborhood can be selected based on
    a fixed cardinality or a fixed graph distance or
    a fixed Euclidean distance.
  • Second, the choice of neighborhood aggregate
    function can be mean, variance, or
    auto-correlation.
  • Third, the choice for comparing a location with
    its neighbors can be either just a number or a
    vector of attribute values.
  • Finally, the statistic for the base distribution
    can be selected as normal distribution.

61
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
  • Algorithms
  • Test Parameters Computation(TPC) Algorithm
  • Route Outlier Detection(ROD) Algorithm

62
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
63
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
64
Data Mining Algorithms for Visualization
65
Software
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/research/shashi-group/vis/tr
    affic_volumemap2.htm
  • http//www.cs.umn.edu/research/shashi-group/vis/Da
    taCube.htm

66
Visualization and Data Mining techniques
  • Thank you!!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com