An integrable difference scheme for the Camassa-Holm equation and numerical computation PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An integrable difference scheme for the Camassa-Holm equation and numerical computation


1
An integrable difference scheme for the
Camassa-Holm equation and numerical computation
  • Kenichi Maruno, Univ. of Texas-Pan American
  • Joint work with
  • Yasuhiro Ohta, Kobe University, Japan
  • Bao-Feng Feng, UT-Pan American

Nonlinear Physics V, Gallipoli, Italy June
12-21, 2008
2
Camassa-Holm Equation History
  • Fuchssteiner Fokas (1981) Derivation from
    symmetry study
  • Camassa Holm (1993) Derivation from shallow
    water wave
  • Camassa, Holm Hyman(1994) Peakon
  • Schiff (1998) Soliton solutions using Backlund
    transform
  • Constantin(2001), Johnson(2004), Li Zhang
    (2005) Soliton solutions using IST
  • Parker(2004) Matsuno (2005) N-soliton solution
    using bilinear method
  • Kraenkel Zenchuk(1999)Dai Li (2005) Cuspon
    solutions

3
Soliton and Cuspon
Ferreira, Kraenkel and Zenchuk JPA 1999
4
Soliton-Cuspon Interaction
Dai Li JPA 2005
5
Numerical Studies of the Camassa-Holm equation
  • Kalisch Lenells 2005 Pseudospectral scheme
  • Camassa, Huang Lee 2005 Particle method
  • Holden, Raynaud 2006,Cohen, Owren Raynaud 2008
    Finite difference scheme, Multi-symplectic
    integration
  • Artebrant Schroll 2006 Finite volume method
  • Coclite, Karlsen Risebro 2008 Finite
    difference scheme

6
Problem
  • What is integrable discretization of Camassa-Holm
    equation?
  • Need a good numerical scheme to simulate the
    Camassa-Holm equation because there exists
    singularity such as peakon and cuspon.
  • Simulation of interaction of soliton and cuspon.

7
Discrete Integrable Systems
  • Differential-difference equations Toda lattice,
    Ablowitz-Ladik lattice, etc.
  • Method of Discretization of integrable systems
    Ablowitz-Ladik, Suris (Lax formulation), Hirota
    (Bilinear formulation), etc.
  • Full discrete integrable systems discrete-time
    KdV, discrete-time Toda ? relationship with
    numerical algorithms (qd algorithm, LR alogrithm,
    etc.)?
  • Discrete PainlĂ©ve equations
  • Discrete Geometry (Discrete-time 2d-Toda, etc.)?
  • Ultra-discrete integrable systems (Soliton
    Cellular Automata)?

8
Discretization using bilinear form(Hirota 1977)?
Soliton Equation
Discrete Soliton Equation
Dependent variable transform
Dependent variable transform
Discrete Bilinear Form
Bilinear Form
Discretization
tau-function
tau-function
Keep solution structure!
9
Bilinear Form of CH Equation
  • Parker, Matsuno didnt use direct bilinear form
    of the CH equation, they used bilinear form of
    AKNS shallow water wave equation which is related
    to the CH equation.
  • To discretize CH equation using bilinear form, we
    need direct bilinear form of the CH equation.

10
Bilinear Form of CH Equation
11
Determinant form of solutions
2-reduction of KP-Toda hierarchy
12
Discretization of bilinear form
2-reduction of semi-discrete KP-Toda hierarchy
13
(No Transcript)
14
Semi-discrete Camassa-Holm Equation
15
Semi-discrete Camassa-Holm
16
Numerical Method
Tridiagonal matrix
17
Simulation of cuspon
of grids 100 Mesh size 0.04 Time step 0.0004
18
Simulation of 2-cuspon interaction
19
Simulation of soliton-cuspon interaction
20
Simulation of soliton-cuspon interaction(Cont.)?
21
Simulation of soliton-cuspon interaction
22
Simulation of soliton-cuspon interaction (Cont.)?
23
Non-exact initial data
24
Conclusions
  • We propose an integrable discretization of the
    Camassa-Holm equation.
  • The integrable difference scheme gives very
    accurate numerical results.
  • We found a determinant form of solutions of the
    discrete Camassa-Holm equation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com