Title: HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM
1HEAT TRANSFER TO A SUNROOM
- the affect of window type on heat transfer
2The Situation
- Clear Day
- Mid June
- Provo, UT
- The Pates have recently added a sunroom to the
exterior of their home. In the summer the
temperature rises in that room a considerable
amount. Should they have installed double pane
windows instead? Should they invest in windows
with reflective coating? How much of a
difference would these windows make?
3What We Know
- Incident Solar Radiation
- East Wall 5015 W/m2
- South Wall 2997 W/m2
- West Wall 5015 W/m2
- Temperature Data
- Tsur, interior 20 C
- Tsur, exterior 35 C
- Physical Properties
- Glass (T300K)
- 1.4 W/mK
- Air
- K.0263 W/mK (T300K)
- Areas of Windows
- East Wall
- 8.09 m2
- South Wall
- 6.77 m2 (x 2)
- 2.60 m2 (x2)
- West Wall
- 8.09 m2
- Volume of the Room
- 60 m3
4What We Assume
- Radiation Properties of Glass
- Transmissivity .95
- Absorbtivity 0
- Reflectivity .05
- Emissivity .9
- Neglect radiation out of the room (only consider
incident radiation)
- No heat transfer through the walls
- Tsur stays constant
- Window areas are all square (see diagram)
5Single Pane Glass
- ho,i 6 W/m2
- qconvcond 728 W
- qrad 1606 W
- qtotal 2324
Ho, To
Hi , Ti
6Double Pane Glass
- RaL91.37 ?T
- RaLmax 1307
- 1307 lt 1708
- Convection between planes is negligible.
- Transmissivity .9
- Reflectivity .1
- h 6 W/m2
- qconvcond 168 W
- qrad 1522 W
- qtotal 1690 W
Ho, To
Hi , Ti
7Double Pane Glass with Coating
- Reflective glass
- Reflectivity .28
- Transmissivity .72
- Heat transfer from convection and conduction
stays the same. - qconvcond 168 W
- qrad 1217 W
- qtotal 1385 W
Ho, To
Hi , Ti
8Air Conditioning Cost
- Single Pane 122.07
- Double Pane 148.09
- Coated Double Pane 216.12
- .08/KWhr
- COP 3.4
- Summer Savings 94.05
- Coating 36/Window
- Estimate 216 to upgrade, 2.5 Summers to recover
the savings
9Presented By
- Nathan Honka
- Dallin Shaw
- Jenny Pate
10Appendix A Radiation Data
11Appendix B Equations
- Inside Convection Coefficient
12Appendix B Equations
- qconv,i on inner surface
- qcond through window
- qconv,o qcond qconv,i
- Could not solve that system so we assumed h6W/m2
to determine qconv,i and qconv,o.
13Appendix C Spreadsheet Solution
SINGLE PANE Area (m2) q (cond conv) q (rad) q (total)
SINGLE PANE 8.09 728.1 1606.2695 2334.3695
SINGLE PANE 6.77 609.3 803.9375 1413.2375
SINGLE PANE 6.77 609.3 803.9375 1413.2375
SINGLE PANE 2.6 234 308.75 542.75
SINGLE PANE 2.6 234 308.75 542.75
SINGLE PANE 8.09 728.1 1606.2695 2334.3695
SINGLE PANE 8580.714
14Appendix C Spreadsheet Solution
DOUBLE PANE Area (m2) q (cond conv) q (rad) q (total)
DOUBLE PANE 8.09 167.8 1521.729 1689.529
DOUBLE PANE 6.77 140.4 761.625 902.025
DOUBLE PANE 6.77 140.4 761.625 902.025
DOUBLE PANE 2.6 53.9 292.5 346.4
DOUBLE PANE 2.6 53.9 292.5 346.4
DOUBLE PANE 8.09 167.8 1521.729 1689.529
DOUBLE PANE 5875.908
15Appendix C Spreadsheet Solution
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING Area (m2) q (cond conv) q (rad) q (total)
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 8.09 167.8 1217.3832 1385.1832
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 6.77 140.4 609.3 749.7
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 6.77 140.4 609.3 749.7
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 2.6 53.9 234 287.9
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 2.6 53.9 234 287.9
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 8.09 167.8 1217.3832 1385.1832
DOUBLE PANE WITH COATING 4845.5664
16Sources
- Incident Solar Radiation Values
http//geology.utah.gov/sep/renewable_energy/solar
/images/data_tables/slcbld.jpg