Linear Systems Iterative Solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Linear Systems Iterative Solutions

Description:

Linear Systems Iterative Solutions CSE 541 Roger Crawfis Convergence Gauss-Seidel Initial guess Equation 1 Equation 2 x= y= x= y= Convergence - SOR ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: RogerAC1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linear Systems Iterative Solutions


1
Linear Systems Iterative Solutions
  • CSE 541
  • Roger Crawfis

2
Sparse Linear Systems
  • Computational Science deals with the simulation
    of natural phenomenon, such as weather, blood
    flow, impact collision, earthquake response, etc.
  • To simulate these issues such as heat transfer,
    electromagnetic radiation, fluid flow and shock
    wave propagation need to be taken into account.
  • Combining initial conditions with general laws of
    physics (conservation of energy and mass), a
    model of these may involve a Partial Differential
    Equation (PDE).

3
Example PDEs
  • The Wave equation
  • 1D ? 2? /? t2 -c2 ? 2? /? x2
  • 3D ? 2? /? t2 -c2 ? 2?
  • Note ? 2? ? 2? /? x2 ? 2? /? y2 ? 2? /? z2
  • ?(x,y,z,t) is some continuous function of space
    and time (e.g., temperature).

4
Example PDEs
  • No changes over time (steady state)
  • Laplaces Equation
  • This can be solved for very simple geometric
    configurations and initial conditions.
  • In general, we need to use the computer to solve
    it.

5
Example PDEs
?Up
  • Second derivatives

? middle
?Left
? right
?Down
? 2 ? (? Left ? Right ? Up ? Down 4 ?
Middle ) / h2 0
6
Finite Differences
  • Fundamentally we are taking derivatives
  • Grid spacing or step size of h.
  • Finite-Difference method uses a regular grid.

7
Finite Differences
  • A very simple problem
  • Find the electrostatic potential inside a box
    whose sides are at a given potential
  • Set up a n by n grid on which the potential is
    defined and satisfies Laplaces Equation

8
Linear System
n2
n
9
3D Simulations
n3
n
n2
10
Gaussian Elimination
  • What happens to these banded matrices when
    Gaussian Elimination is applied?
  • Matrix only has about 7n3 non-zero elements.
  • Matrix size N2, where Nn3 or n6 elements
  • Gaussian Elimination on these suffers from fill.
  • The forward elimination phase will produce n2
    non-zero elements per row, or n5 non-zero
    elements.

11
Memory Costs
  • Example n300
  • Memory cost
  • 189,000,000 189106 elements
  • Floats gt 756MB
  • Doubles gt 1.4GB
  • Full matrix would be 7.291014!
  • Gaussian Elimination
  • Floats gt 1.91013MB
  • With n300, simulating weather for the state of
    Ohio would have samples gt 1km apart.
  • Remember, this is h in central differences.

12
Solutions for Sparse Matrices
  • Need to keep memory (and computation) low.
  • These types of problems motivate the Iterative
    Solutions for Linear Systems.
  • Iterate until convergence.

13
Jacobi Iteration
  • One of the easiest splitting of the matrix A is
    AD-M, where D is the diagonal elements of A.
  • Axb
  • Dx-Mxb
  • Dx Mxb
  • x(k)D-1Mx(k-1)D-1b
  • Trivial to compute D-1.

14
Jacobi Iteration
  • Another way to understand this is to treat each
    equation separately
  • Given the ith equation, solve for xi.
  • Assume you know the other variables.
  • Use the current guess for the other variables.

15
Jacobi iteration
16
Jacobi Iteration
  • Cute, but will it work?
  • Algorithms, even mathematical ones, need a
    mathematical framework or analysis.
  • Lets first look at a simple example.

17
Jacobi Iteration - Example
  • Example system
  • Initial guess
  • Algorithm

18
Jacobi Iteration - Example
1st iteration 2nd iteration
19
Jacobi Iteration - Example
  • x(3) 0.427734375
  • y(3) 1.177734375
  • z(3) 2.876953125
  • x(4) -0.351
  • y(4) 0.620
  • z(4) 1.814

Actual Solution x 0 y 1 z 2
20
Jacobi Iteration
  • Questions
  • How many iterations do we need?
  • What is our stopping criteria?
  • Is it faster than applying Gaussian Elimination?
  • Are there round-off errors or other precision and
    robustness issues?

21
Jacobi Method - Implementation
  • while( !converged )
  • for (int i0 iltN i) // For each equation
  • double sum bi
  • for (int j0 jltN j) // Compute new xi
  • if( i ltgt j )
  • sum -A(i,j)x(j)
  • tempi sum / Ai,i
  • // Test for convergence
  • x temp

Complexity Each Iteration O(N2) Total O(MN2)
22
Jacobi Method - Complexity
  • while( !converged )
  • for (int i0 iltN i) // For each equation
  • double sum bi
  • foreach (double element in nonZeroElementsi)
  • // Compute new xi
  • if( i ltgt j )
  • sum -A(i,j)x(j)
  • tempi sum / Ai,i
  • // Test for convergence
  • x temp

Complexity Each Iteration O(pN) Total
O(MpN) p non-zero elements
For our 2D Laplacian Equation, p4 Nn2 with
n300 gt N90,000
23
Jacobi Iteration
  • Cute, but does it work for all matrices?
  • Does it work for all initial guesses?
  • Algorithms, even mathematical ones, need a
    mathematical framework or analysis.
  • We still do not have this.

24
Gauss-Seidel Iteration
  • Split the matrix A into three parts ADLU,
    where D is the diagonal elements of A, L is the
    lower triangular part of A and U is the upper
    part.
  • Axb
  • DxLxUxb
  • (DL)x b-Ux

(DL)x(k)b-Ux(k-1)
25
Gauss-Seidel Iteration
  • Another way to understand this is to again treat
    each equation separately
  • Given the ith equation, solve for xi.
  • Assume you know the other variables.
  • Use the most current guess for the other
    variables.

26
Gauss-Seidel Iteration
  • Looking at it more simply

This iteration
Last iteration
27
Gauss-Seidel Iteration
  • Questions
  • How many iterations do we need?
  • What is our stopping criteria?
  • Is it faster than applying Gaussian Elimination?
  • Are there round-off errors or other precision and
    robustness issues?

28
Gauss-Seidel - Implementation
  • while( !converged )
  • for (int i0 iltN i) // For each equation
  • double sum bi
  • foreach (double element in nonZeroElementsi)
  • if( i ltgt j )
  • sum -A(i,j)x(j)
  • xi sum / Ai,i
  • // Test for convergence
  • temp x

Complexity Each Iteration O(pN) Total
O(MpN) p non-zero elements
Differences from Jacobi
29
Convergence
  • Jacobi Iteration can be shown to converge from
    any initial guess if A is strictly diagonally
    dominant.
  • Diagonally dominant
  • Strictly Diagonally dominant

30
Convergence
  • Gauss-Seidel can be shown to converge is A is
    symmetric positive definite.

31
Convergence - Jacobi
  • Consider the convergence graphically for a 2D
    system

Equation 1
Equation 2
y
x
y
x
Initial guess
32
Convergence - Jacobi
  • What if we swap the order of the equations?

Equation 2
Equation 1
x
  • Not diagonally dominant
  • Same set of equations!

Initial guess
33
Diagonally Dominant
  • What does diagonally dominant mean for a 2D
    system?
  • 10xy12 gt high-slope (more vertical)
  • x10y21 gt low-slope (more horizontal)
  • Identity matrix (or any diagonal matrix) would
    have the intersection of a vertical and a
    horizontal line. The b vector controls the
    location of the lines.

34
Convergence Gauss-Seidel
Equation 1
y
Equation 2
x
y
x
Initial guess
35
Convergence - SOR
  • Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) just adds an
    extrapolation step.
  • w 1.3 impliesgo an extra30

Equation 1
Extrapolation
y
x
Equation 2
Extrapolation
y
x
Initial guess
This would Extrapolation at the very end (mix of
Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel.
36
Convergence - SOR
  • SOR with Gauss-Seidel

Equation 1
x
Equation 2
y
x
Initial guess
Extrapolation in bold
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com