Title: Social Policy
1Social Policy
- Paula Barrenechea, Kaitlyn Bregman, Samantha
Rodriguez, and Lee Ryan
2What is Social Policy?
- Social policies are distributive or
redistributive policies that seek to improve the
quality of citizens lives - Deal with quality of life and standards of living
- The poverty threshold is the income level below
which a family is legally considered poor. - Calculated by the Census Bureau
3Social Policy Overview, contd.
- Means-tested programs social programs whose
beneficiaries qualify by demonstrating need - Social insurance programs programs that offer
benefits in exchange for contributions
4It all comes down to
5Social Security
6History
- Created in the 1930s as part of FDRs New Deal
programs - Intended to implement social insurance for
elderly during the Great Depression - Initial selling point would decrease
unemployment during the 30s by encouraging older
workers to retire, opening up job opportunities
for younger people
7Funding
- Social Security is paid for by a payroll tax
money deducted from annual income - In 1939 the Social Security Act was amended to
create a trust fund for any surplus funds - Benefits are funded by taxes imposed on wages of
employees and the self-employed - The employer and employee are responsible for
half of the Social Security tax self-employed
people are responsible for all of it
8(No Transcript)
9Reform?
- Democrats dont want to see anything changed
- Republicans consider Social Security the ultimate
Big Government program, but learned its
popularity with voters makes it untouchable - However, considering current demographic trends,
the Social Security trust fund will not be able
to meet obligations - Politicians are (reluctantly) begin considering
reform
10Current Options
- Raise the retirement age
- Reduce the amount of each Social Security check
- Privatization
- One idea calls for the system to invest some of
its money in the financial markets instead of in
relatively listless government bonds
11Role in Policy Implementation
- Throughout a workers career, the Social Security
Administration keeps track of his/her earnings - Amount of monthly benefit the worker is entitled
to depends on the earning record and the age at
which the retiree chooses to begin receiving
benefits - From its inception, Social Security benefits have
been paid almost entirely by using revenue from
payroll taxes
12Court Cases
- Steward Machine Company v. Davis (5-4)
- Arguments opposed to the SSA held the act went
beyond the powers that were granted to the
federal government in the Constitution - The federal government was forcing each state to
establish an unemployment-compensation fund that
would meets its criteria, but it did not have the
power to enact such a program - Helvering vs. Davis
- Decdied on same day as the Steward case
- Essentially, the Social Security Tax was
constitutional as a mere exercise of Congresss
general taxation powers
13Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
- AARP CEO A. Barry Rand and President W. Lee
Hammond - The Urban League President and CEO Marc. H
Morial - Department of Health and Human Services
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius - House Education and the Workforce Committee
Chairman John Kline - Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Phil Roe - Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin - Subcommittee on Retirement and Aging
14Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone.
- Who benefits?
- The retired, elderly, widowed, and disabled
- An example of majoritarian politics
- Because we all get old eventually.
15Head-On Collision?
16Welfare
17Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
- Passed as part of the Social Security Act of 1935
- Previously, states had put the duty of caring for
needy children and families on local governments
using money from local property taxes - Used until TANF passed in 1996
- Originally called Aid to Dependent Children
- Did not originally give aid to parent/family, but
did say that the child had to be living with a
parent or family in order to be eligible for aid - Caretakers of dependent children did not begin
receiving federal aid until 1950
18AFDC
- Federal provisions provided to states in order to
help children - State participation completely voluntary
- State would submit a plan to be approved by
federal administrators - Had to meet certain minimal conditions to receive
funds - Most states proposed a plan due to the Depression
- No fixed amount authorized reimbursement of a
portion of state spending without a limit on
total amount
19Total, Federal, and State Expenditures
20Trends in Federal Expenditures
21Welfare and Low-Income Health Care Assistance
Jumps
22AFDC
- Federal government eventually made the following
mandatory - benefits to second parents in families with
incapacitated/unemployed parents, effective 1984 - benefits to families of incapacitated/unemployed
parents, effective 1990
23AFDC Supreme Court Cases
- King v. Smith (1968)
- The real issue before the court was if states
could decide how to enforce a federal program. - The Court ruled that AFDC could not be withheld
from a family due to the presence of a
substitute father.
24AFDC Supreme Court Cases cont.
- Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)
- NYC residents currently receiving AFDC appealed
to the Supreme Court, alleging that officials
administering aid terminated it without notice or
hearing - The Court held that
- Due process is applicable to termination of
welfare benefits - The benefits of providing welfare outweigh the
benefits of cutting it - A pre-termination evidentiary hearing is
necessary - Counsel is not necessary but must be allowed
- The decision maker must be impartial.
25AFDC
- Beliefs that influence its creation
- Need to help less fortunate children and by
extension, their families - Civic duty
- Individual responsibility
- Entitlements
26AFDC Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone.
- Who benefits?
- Families with dependent children.
- An example of client politics.
27Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
- Created August 1996 to replace AFDC, Job
Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS),
and Emergency Assistance (EA) - Individualized block grant that help its
recipients find work and make the need for aid
temporary - Instead of the federal government reimbursing
states for the aid they give, it gives states
block grants for this specific purpose
28TANF
- Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 reauthorized TANF
through 2010, focusing on work, integrity, and
making families stronger by promoting marriage
and responsible fathers - In February 2009, President Obama signed the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which
established the Emergency Contingency Fund for
state TANF programs
29Goals of TANF
- Help needy families so that children can grow up
in their own homes - Reduce the neediness of parents of these families
by helping with job preparation, work, and
marriage - Prevent pregnancies outside of marriage
- Encourage families with two parents
30TANF Work Requirements
- Those receiving TANF must work as soon as they
are ready for a job and no later than two years
after they begin receiving assistance - If parents dont work, benefits can be
reduced/cut off entirely - States cannot penalize single parents with a
child under 6 for failing to meet work
requirements if they cannot find acceptable child
care - States must have a certain proportion of all
families working or be slapped with a financial
penalty 50 overall, 90 two parent families
31TANF Work Activities
- Unsubsidized/subsidized employment
- Work experience
- On-the-job training
- Job search/readiness assistance
- Community service
- Vocational education training (no more than a
year)
- Vocational education training (no more than a
year) - Job skills training that is work-related
- Education directly related to work
- Satisfactory secondary school attendance
- Providing child care to individuals participating
in community service
32TANF
- Limit for assistance is five years (not
necessarily consecutive) - State can choose to extend the period for 1/5 of
its caseload, or by using their own funds or
Social Services block grant funds
33TANF Penalties
- Failure to reduce recipient grants if recipient
rejects work without good cause - Severing assistance to single parents with a
child under 6 who cannot afford child care - Using funds inappropriately
- Not establishing/maintaining work verification
procedures
- Failure to meet work requirements
- Failure to comply with five-year limit
- Failure to meet maintenance requirement
- Not submitting data reports
- Failure to participate in the Income and
Eligibility Verification System
34Federal Funding for TANF
- In FY 2009, the following Federal funding is
available for TANF - TANF Block Grant - 16.5 billion is available to
States, Territories, and Tribes through the TANF
block grant. - Supplemental Grants - 319 million is available
to 17 States that experienced increases in their
populations and/or had low levels of welfare
spending per capita. A state qualified for a
grant in years after FY 1998 only if it qualified
in FY 1998.
35TANF Funding, contd.
- TANF Contingency Fund - 1.3 billion is available
to States that have increased unemployment or
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
caseloads as defined in the Social Security Act. - TANF Emergency Fund - 5 billion is available
States, Territories, and Tribes in fiscal year
(FY) 2009 and FY 2010 that have an increase in
assistance caseloads and basic assistance
expenditures, or in expenditures related to
short-term benefits or subsidized employment.
36TANF Performance
37TANF Supreme Court Case
- Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001)
- Carmen Velazquez lost welfare benefits under
TANF she wanted an LSC attorney to represent
her in challenging the provision of TANF that
disqualified her for welfare - Congress passed the Omnibus Consolidated
Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 which
did not allow LSC attorneys to represent welfare
recipients in trying to amend welfare policies - Possible violation of the First Amendment
- Court ruled that it violated the First Amendment
by regulating private speech and trying to
protect and federal law from legitimate judicial
challenges
38Problems and Solutions
- Difficult to identify problems- run slightly
differently in every state due to block grants - Some states have very work-training focused
programs- help parents get back on their feet - Others simply throw money at parents until they
are no longer eligible - Solution
- Attach more requirements to block grants so that
federal government has more control over exactly
how states run TANF programs
39TANF
- Beliefs that influenced its creation
- Civic duty
- Individual responsibility
- Responsibility to take care of the less fortunate
- entitlements
40Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone funded by taxes
- Who benefits?
- Families in need
- An example of client politics
- Everyone pays, only the needy families benefit.
41Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
- National Organization for Women President Terry
ONeill - Department of Health and Human Services
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius - House Education and the Workforce Committee
Chairman John Kline - Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Phil Roe - Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin - Subcommittee on Children and Families
42HEALTH CARE
43Current Policy
- Under current health care policies, American
citizens purchase health insurance from private
companies or are given health insurance as part
of their work benefits. - Health insurance is a bit of a betting game. The
insurance company is betting that you will pay
more in fees and premiums than theyll have to
pay in your medical bills youre paying the fees
and premiums just in case something happens. - Because of this, those with pre-existing
conditions often face higher fees or are denied
coverage entirely.
44Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Would require most Americans to have health
insurance - Would add 16 mill people to Medicaid rolls
- Would subsidize health coverage for low and
middle class - Projected cost 938 bil over 10 years, according
to CBO
45Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Immediate Changes
- Those who were denied coverage for a pre-existing
condition will be offered insurance subsidized by
the federal government - Wont allow insurance companies to drop people
who get sick or increase rates dramatically for
those with pre-existing conditions - Extends coverage for children under parents plan
- Closes Medicaid donut hole
- Gives tax credits to small businesses so they can
afford to offer insurance to their employees
46Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Short-Term Changes
- Free annual check-ups for those on Medicare
- Reforms Medicaid
- Long-Term Changes
- All Americans must have health insurance or pay a
fine - Big companies must provide health insurance with
benefits - Gives tax-credits to poor families
- Establish state-based insurance market exchanges
47Because were tired of talking
48Court Cases
- State of Florida et al v. US Department of Health
and Human Services et al (US District Court,
Northern District of Florida) (2011) - Second US judge to declare the reform law
unconstitutional - Said that the individual mandate crossed the
line by requiring Americans to buy health
insurance by 2014 or pay a fine - Because it is integral to the bill, the whole
bill must be declared null and void - Judges in 26 other states (mostly Republican)
have taken similar stances on the issue - Will most likely end up in Supreme Court
49Influential Beliefs and Opponents
- What beliefs influence the creation of this
policy? - Both Republicans and Democrats believe the
healthcare system has been in serious need of
reform. - The Democratic plan operates on the premise that
access to health insurance is a fundamental
right, and seeks to make it more widely available
to the uninsured and underinsured. - Who are their chief opponents or advocates for
reform? - Republicans oppose it their alternative is
focused on reducing the costs of health insurance - Have made a failed attempt to repeal it better
solution would be to amend parts of the bill
50Costs and Benefits
- Costs
- Will cost 940 billion
- Money will be provided by new taxes, fees on
industries involved in health care, and cuts in
projected spending growth for existing government
health efforts, primarily Medicare. - Benefits
- CBO estimates that enacting will produce a net
reduction in federal deficits of 143 bil from
2010-2019 - Will help the underinsunred and uninsured
51Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone partially paid for by taxes
- Insurance companies lose competitive edge
- Who benefits?
- Those who cannot afford health insurance,
especially those with pre-exisiting conditions
uninsured and underinsured - An example of client politics.
52Obamas Thought Process
53Medicare
- 1965- President Lyndon B. Johnson amended the
Social Security Act - Originally, workers intended to pay a small
payroll tax deduction for it - Those who receive it pay a monthly premium for
doctor visits, outpatient services, ER visits,
etc. - Fourth most costly program mandatory spending
- 2003- Bush enacted Medicare Modernization Act,
which extended prescription drug coverage
54Medicare
- Federal health insurance program for those 65 and
over, those with permanent kidney failure, and
some disabled below 65 - Means-tested program
- Managed by states, funded by both state and
federal governments - Covers hospital insurance, inpatient hospital
care, skilled nursing facility care, home health
care, hospice care, medical insurance (Part B)
55Court Cases
- Papciak v. Sebelius
- A federal district court in Pittsburgh rejected
termination of skilled rehabilitation services
after 5 wks to an 81 yr old nursing home resident
after hip replacement surgery - Court said that skilled services can be provided
if beneficiarys conditions is likely to improve
materially in a reasonable or generally
predictable period of time or if services are
necessary for the establishment of a safe and
effective maintenance program - Anderson v. Sebelius
- Secretary utilized informal, unlawful standard
resulting in denial of services because recipient
was believed to be medically stable - Court said services can be covered even when
recipients condition is stable and unlikely to
change elibility must be based on unique
circumstances
56Opponents and Advocates
- Opponents
- Some argue that its development marked a shift
away from personal responsibility and toward a
view that health care is an entitlement that
others should pay for. - Conservatives oppose it under belief that it may
lead America to socialism - Advocates
- Not generally an unearned entitlement
- Entitlement is most commonly based on a record of
contributions to the Medicare fund - Form of social insurance, which makes it
reasonable for people to pay for insurance for
sickness when they are older while they are young
and able to work - Some will pay in more than they get back and
other will get back more that they paid, but that
is just how it is
57Influential Beliefs
- Prior to 1965, most elderly people had no health
insurance if they did, it was usually inadequate
- Wanted more access to insurance coverage of
healthcare leading to increased benefits for
elderly - Has also led to higher life expectancy and a
decrease in the poverty rate of eldery
58Costs and Benefits
- Costs
- Medicare taxes apply to payments of wages,
regardless of citizenship of either the employee
or employer - Medicare Benefits by Service in 2010 510.2
billion - Benefits
- Help elderly pay for medical services they paid
for Medicare when they were younger and working
59Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone paid for by taxes
- Who benefits?
- All the elderly who cannot afford health
insurance. - An example of client politics.
60Sure, blame them
61Medicaid
- 1965- LBJ amends the Social Security Act
- Gives free healthcare to the poor
- Is funded by national and state governments
- Was originally directly linked with welfare
- Regulated by states more than federal government
62Medicaid
- One can be retroactively eligible up to three
months prior to date of application, if one
would have been eligible then - Coverage stops when individual rises above
poverty level - Most states have their own state programs for
those who do not qualify for Medicaid - Hopeful recipients are tested for low income and
poor assets and resources
63State and Federal Roles
- The states
- Receive federal funds in proportion to how much
they spend - May choose to expand eligibility and benefits
past minimum federal requirements - May reduce provider payments and access to
prescription drugs - May restrict eligibility and benefits
- Repair shortfalls in spending by increasing taxes
- The federal government
- Makes and open-ended commitment to match spending
of state Medicaid programs
64Funding
- Federal government spent 295 billion in 2010
- States will spend 7.4 more than last year- more
due to recession - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided
87 billion to states for Medicaid
65Solutions
- Block grants- would not offer an undeclared
amount of funds as it does not, but would reduce
unnecessary costs - Health Savings Accounts and Vouchers- vouchers
used to buy private health insurance - Withdrawing assistance from those who are
eligible for Medicaid but can afford insurance
66Opponents and Advocates
- Advocates
- Liberals want more welfare programs for the poor
believe that it is the duty of the government to
provide for them - Opponents
- Conservatives believe in less regulation of
businesses and healthcare
67Supreme Court Cases
- California Assistance of Rural Health Clinics v.
Maxwell-Jolly - Challenged a law enacted last year that
eliminated coverage for certain services provided
by Rural Health clinics - Court affirmed that health care providers have a
right to challenge state laws that conflict with
or violate federal Medicaid requirements
68Influential Beliefs
- Government should continue to help poor pay for
health insurance number that need help
increasing - Need for health insurance increased as elderly
population keeps on growing - Medical costs rising sharply
- Advocacy groups encouraging government action
69Costs and Benefits
- Costs
- Discourages self-help
- Either overuse of medical care or can mean that
they receive poorer quality care - Second largest expenditure in most states
- Benefits
- Helps the poor get much needed medical care
70Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone paid for by taxes
- Who benefits?
- Poor mothers and children, disabled and elderly,
and those needing long-term care. - An example of client politics.
71Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
- AARP CEO A. Barry Rand, President W. Lee Hammond
- The Urban League President and CEO Marc H.
Morial - AMA Chair of Board of Trustees Dr. Ardis Dee
Hoven - Department of Health and Human Services
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius - House Education and the Workforce Committee
Chairman John Kline - Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Phil Roe - Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin - Subcommittee on Retirement and Aging
72Social Policy in the Workplace
73Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Passed July 26, 1990 by George H.W. Bush
- Belief that works with workers with disabilities
have a right to be treated equally - Services provided Accessibility.
- Change in designing curb cuts on streets, ramps,
lifts, and other designs of products in
buildings, public spaces, and roads
74ADA How It Works
- Employers must provide reasonable accommodations
for disabled employees, unless the accommodations
pose an undue hardship on the employer. - Undue hardship an action that causes much
difficulty and/or expenses when compared to the
employers size, resources, and operation. - Examples buying or modifying equipment,
adjusting modifying exams, training programs, and
providing interpreters, etc.
75ADA
- States role is described in five titles
- Title I
- Prohibits employers, including cities and towns,
from discriminating against qualified job
applicants and workers who are or who become
disabled - Title II
- Prohibits state and local governments from
discriminating against disabled persons in their
programs and activities
76ADA
- Title III
- Prohibits private enterprises who provide public
accommodations and services (e.g., hotels,
restaurants, and transit systems) from denying
goods, services and programs to people based on
their disabilities - Title IV
- Makes available telecommunications devices and
services for the hearing and speech impaired - Title V
- Miscellaneous provisions that relate to the
construction and application of the ADA,
including alternative dispute resolution.
77Court Cases
- Sutton and Hinton v. United Air Lines Inc.
- Supreme Court re-defined disability. "A
disability exists only where an impairment
substantially limits a major life activity, not
where it might, could, or would be
substantially limiting if mitigating measures
were not taken.
78Court Cases cont.
- Olmstead v. L.C.
- The Supreme Court did conclude that, "under Title
II of the ADA, States are required to place
persons with mental disabilities in community
settings rather than in institutions when the
State's treatment professionals have determined
that community placement is appropriate, the
transfer from institutional care to a less
restrictive setting is not opposed by the
affected individual, and the placement can be
reasonably accommodated, taking into account the
resources available to the State and the needs of
others with mental disabilities."
79Efficacy of ADA
- Because of the ADAs mandating of complimentary
paratransit services more people can get from one
place to another buildings have made their
facilities more accessible to the disabled. Ie,
touching a button to open door, larger bathroom
stalls, elevators, etc. - In 1990, 70 percent of people with disabilities
were unemployed, and the figure remains the same
today. Two problems have been adverse court
rulings and contradictory federal policies that
make it difficult for people with disabilities to
work - Percentage of disabled people unemployed has not
decreased, because employers find it costly to
provide all the accommodations for a disabled
employee
80ADA
- Usually being disabled limits amount of work that
can be accomplished - Percentage of disabled population that can work
is 6.7 - Proposed solution
- Create Disabled Workers Tax Credit
- Providing a wage subsidy encouraging them to
remain in or reenter the workplace after becoming
disabled - Reduce the cost of rehiring and accommodating
81ADA
- Some state and local governments have opposed the
ADA - Believe it is unconstitutional to encourage a
division of social class and to provide more
benefits to one group of people than to another - Private business owners have also been in
opposition
82The ADA and the Bureaucracy
- ADA is enforced by
- Federal Communications Commission
telecommunications services regulation - Department of Justice regulations regarding
public accommodations and state and local
government services - Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board issues guidelines to ensure
that buildings, facilities, and transit vehicles
are usable by those with disabilities Department
of Transportation transit regulations - Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program
coordinating authority under the employment
related provisions of ADA Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission employment regulations - Civil Rights Center enforces Title II of ADA
(works with state and local governments)
83The ADA and Interest Groups
- Media and Disability interest group
- Major contributors
- Members and Staff of the National Council on
Disability - Chairperson Marta Bistro
- Vice Chairperson Kate P. Wolters
- Executive Director Ethel D. Briggs
- National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center
- Dr. Gerben DeJong Director
84Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone.
- Who benefits?
- The disabled.
- An example of client politics.
85These are tough times
86Skills For Americas Future
- Proposed by President Obama in October 2010 to
improve industry relationships with community
colleges to ensure that students are acquiring
skills and knowledge needed to enter the labor
force - Goal 5 mil more community college graduates by
2020 - Works through initiative matches of employers
(Aspen Institute, McDonalds) with community
colleges in all states in order to create
programs to prepare students for working life
87Skills for Americas Future, cont.
- Efforts in seven main areas
- Executive agency action
- State/gubernatorial outreach
- Workforce investment system outreach
- Educational outreach
- Events
- Media
- Sponsorships
88Costs and Benefits
- Benefits
- Build career paths with businesses
- Advance teaching of skills
- Establish education partnerships
- Support new online courses
- Costs
- Very new policy- public has not seen effects of
its implementation yet - Monetary costs may outweigh the long-term
benefits - May significantly reduce employment in young
adult work force without college education
because the competition for jobs is already high
among community college students
89Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone paid for by taxes
- Who benefits?
- Those who attend community colleges.
- An example of client politics.
90Education
91Title I
- Signed by Lyndon B. Johnson in April 1965
- Provides financial assistance through state
educational agencies (SEAs) to local educational
agencies (LEAs) and schools with high
numbers/percentages of poor children to help
ensure all children meet challenging state
academic standards based on Census poverty
ratings and cost of education per state - Funds support extra instruction in reading,
math, preschool programs, after-school programs,
summer programs - Funding
- appropriations have grown by 60 since 1994 in
2008, appropriated 13,898,875,000
92Title I State Involvement
- Title I standards, curriculum, and instruction
are tied to those developed within each state for
all children - Evaluations cannot assess the program in
isolation from state and local reform efforts - Developing comprehensive statewide data systems
allow districts and schools to track student
achievement over time, link student and teacher
data, and gather information on school- and
district-level performance - Consulting Resolution would eliminate all federal
funding for statewide data systems
93Title I State Involvement, contd.
- Presidents budget recognizes that strong data
systems are critically important in order to
identify strategies
94No Child Left Behind
- Proposed by George W. Bush and Senator Ted
Kennedy (D) - Main idea if a child begins to fall behind, any
measures necessary will be taken to get them at
least to the standards of the state. - Goals
- Increase the accountability of states, school
districts, and schools - Give more choices to parents and students
- Provide more flexibility for states and local
education agencies when using federal education
grants - Put a stronger emphasis on reading, especially
for younger children
95Funding
- Federal government has given states 400 mil per
year to enforce NCLB - Increased Title 1 grants by 59
- Dept. of Education distributes funding to schools
and school districts with students from low
income families - Gave more flexibility to the states
96Problems and Solutions
- NCLB offers parents to send their children to
another school if the local school is in need of
improvement more difficult for rural children
due to transportation issues - Already difficult to find teachers raising
standards will require more training - Pathway to Teaching Careers Program (identifying
and training noncertified teachers), Teachers of
Tomorrow (offers salary bonuses to teach in
shortage areas), Teaching as a Priority
(incentives to teach in low quality schools) - Only grades 5-12 can be offered learning through
computer programs - Those who provide technology for learning do not
need to provide services to every school district
in a state this tends to benefit schools in
cities - States work with rural school districts to
identify technological providers in community to
provide services
97Opponents and Advocates
- Supporters
- Believe test results will improve the overall
quality of education - Want to democratize US education by setting
standards and providing resources to schools - Opponents
- Teacher unions
- Do not agree with standardized testing
98Court Cases
- Horne v. Flores (2009)
- In Jan. 2000, US District Court for Arizona cited
the state for civil contempt because it failed to
fund English language learner programs - Superintendent of programs argued that increases
in state funding and NCLB altered the foundations
of district courts ruling on not funding the
programs - Supreme Court ruled that the lower courts
standard was too strict and the federal district
court could examine legal areas to grant relief
to AZ
99Costs and Benefits
- Costs
- Underfunded at the state level
- Concentrates on standardized testing
- Benefits
- Flexibility encouraged accountability
100Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Who pays for it?
- Everyone paid for by taxes
- Who benefits?
- Public school students, teachers, staff, and
parents. - An example of client politics.
101Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
- House Education and the Workforce Committee
Chairman John Kline - Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and
Secondary Education Chairman Duncan D. Hunter - Subcommittee on Workforce Protection Chairman
Tim Walberg - Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce
Training Chairwoman Virginia Foxx - Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Phil Roe
102Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups, cont.
- Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin - Subcommittee on Children and Families
- Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety
- Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan
- Department of Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis
- AFL-CIO President Richard L. Trumka
- American Federation of Teachers President Randi
Weingarten
103What we really ship to China
104Bibliography
GET SHEET