LINAC PROTON SOURCE MODULATORS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

LINAC PROTON SOURCE MODULATORS

Description:

Title: Presenting a Technical Report Author: wolff Last modified by: wolff Created Date: 9/18/2001 7:27:26 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: wolff
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LINAC PROTON SOURCE MODULATORS


1
LINAC PROTON SOURCE MODULATORS
FERMILAB
 
2
MODULATOR SPECS
  • Output Voltage 120kV
  • Output Current 140 amps
  • Output Pulse Length 4.5 ms
  • Pulse Rate 3 Hz
  • Input Voltage 480 VAC
  • Spark Energy Limit 20 joules
  • Regulation (incl. slope) 1 (?)
  • Design should minimize cost for upgrade
  • to 10 Hz pulse rate at 1.5 ms pulse width.

3
POTENTIAL MODULATOR TECHNOLOGIES
  • FNAL (Bouncer-type) with Updated Technology
  • Higher Voltage IGBTs, New Caps, New Controls
  • SNS High Frequency Switcher
  • Small Size
  • Being commercially produced
  • - As yet, unproven operational reliability
  • - Passive circuit on secondary to control
    spark energy
  • deserves further investigation
  • - HV/HF Transformer is tricky. Is it
    reliable?
  • - Pulse flattening yet to be demonstrated
  • Miss-Matched PFN Russian Idea, not
    demonstrated
  • No Bouncer Needed
  • Interesting, might be more reliable
  • - Need to build one

4
FNAL Bouncer-type 4.5 ms Modulator Simplified
Schematic
5
Bouncer-type Modulator with Updated Technology
  • IGBT Switch
  • Using New Higher Voltage Devices
  • 50 reduction in cost and physical size
  • Main Capacitor Bank
  • Using New HAZY Self-Healing Polypropylene
    Capacitors
  • 50 Reduction in Cap Cost and Physical Size
  • Modulator Controls
  • Using Lab G type SM Components, fewer cable
    interconnects
  • 25 reduction in parts, 50 reduction in labor

6
Bouncer-type Modulator - New Features
  • Redundant IGBT Switch Design
  • - Eliminating the Backup Switch 20
    reduction in cost
  • - BUT Requires redundancy in number of switch
    devices and gate controls
  • - Replaces Ignitrons with less expensive SCRs
    in crowbar circuit
  • - Eliminates very high current crowbars and
    associated noise
  • - Maybe a zero gains feature but better
    reliability
  • Boost Converter Regulation
  • - Goal is to achieve /- 5
    control/regulation
  • - Allows for multiple modulators fed from one
    charging power supply.
  • Smoothing Choke
  • - Series choke of sufficient size to limit AC
    line fluctuations to /- 1
  • (present Linac area AC lines 15Hz voltage
    distortion).
  • - If new Linac fed from dedicated 345kV
    transformer, above
  • requirement could be relaxed.

7
4.5 ms Modulator Design Features thatminimize
1.5ms upgrade costs
  • 2 parallel IGBT Switches
  • Main Cap Bank designed to separated into 3.
  • RMS current based on 10 Hz 1.5 ms operation
  • Bouncer Caps and Inductors designed to be
    separated into 3.
  • RMS current based on 10 Hz 1.5 ms operation
  • Charging Power Supply
  • Assuming boost converter regulation works, the
    same charging PS could be used to power 3 of the
    1.5 ms modulators.

8
Original FERMI TESLA MODULATOR Parts Cost
  • Pulser Parts Cost
  • Pulse Transformer 108k
  • Pwr Transformer 50k
  • Main Cap Bank 31k
  • Cabinet 15k
  • Other 126k
  • Subtotal 330k
  • IGBT Switch Subtotal 50k
  • Modulator Controls Subtotal 40k
  • TOTAL 420K

9
Original FERMI TESLA MODULATOR Total Cost
  • PULSER PARTS ESTIMATE 420k
  • RF MODULES (Spark Detection) 12k
    (AWAG)
  • LABOR ESTIMATE
  • (Total parts cost) (Pulse Transformer)
  • 422k - 108k 314k
  • TOTAL (1996 s) 735k
  • TOTAL
  • Inflation Since 1996 (8 yrs at 2.5/yr) 22
  • 1.22 x 735k 900k

10
Original Fermi TESLA Modulator Updated
Technology cost savings
  • IGBT Switch
  • Using New Higher Voltage Devices and eliminating
    the backup switch
  • 60k savings in labor and parts
  • Main Capacitor Bank
  • Using New HAZY Self-Healing Polypropylene
    Capacitors
  • 30k savings in labor and parts
  • 5k savings in Cabinet, Reduced Service
    Building Size!
  • Controls Upgrade
  • 30k Savings in parts and labor
  • Total updated technology savings 125k
  • TOTAL
  • Inflation Since 1996 (8 yrs at 2.5/yr) 22
  • 1.22 x (735k-125k) 745k

11
4.5 ms Modulator Cost Estimate
  • Pulse Transformer 108k x sqrt(3)
    190k
  • Pwr Transformer 50k same 50k
  • Main Cap Bank 31k x1/2
    x3 50k
  • Cabinet 15k x8/5
    25k
  • Other 126k see
    notes 270k

  • Subtotal
    585k
  • IGBT Switch Subtotal 50k x
    4/10 x2 40k
  • Modulator Controls Subtotal 40k x 5/8
    25k
  • TOTAL parts 650K

12
4.5 ms Modulator Cost Estimate Total Cost
  • PULSER PARTS ESTIMATE 650k
  • RF MODULES (Spark Detection) 12k
    (AWAG)
  • LABOR ESTIMATE
  • (Total parts cost) (Pulse Transformer)
  • 650k - 190k 460k
  • TOTAL parts and labor (1996 s) 1122k
  • TOTAL
  • Inflation Since 1996 (8 yrs at 2.5/yr) 22
  • 1.22 x 1122k 1370k

13
ESTIMATED SIZE !Simple scaling, no attempt to
optimize
14
4.5 ms ModulatorProject Organization
  • Project Leader Howie Pfeffer
  • Magnetics Chris Jensen
  • Controls Jim Biggs ( P. Prieto)
  • Switch, Cap Bank, Bouncer, Misc., Leon Bartelson
  • and construction
  • Computer Simulations Dan Wolff
  • Estimated project time
  • Design, construction, and commissioning 18
    months
  • after s available.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com