Teachers, Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Teachers, Students

Description:

Teachers, Students & the First Amendment – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Tyler56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teachers, Students


1
Teachers, Students theFirst Amendment
2
The First Amendment (1791)
3
Three Rs of the First Amendment
  • Rights Individual (Each of us is born with
    certain inalienable rights)
  • Responsibilities Mutual (Each of us must accept
    the responsibility to guard the rights of others
    especially those with whom we most deeply
    disagree)
  • Respect Universal (Each of us must commit to
    debate out differences with respect).

4
How Important is Free Press?
  • If it were left to me to decide whether we
    should have a government without a free press or
    a free press without government, I would choose
    the latter. T. Jefferson

5
Do students in public schools have First
Amendment rights?
  • Yes
  • No
  • It depends

6
YesBut Not Until Recently
  • 1791 Congress shall make no law
  • 1908 Students suspended for poem critical of
    their teacher Such power is essential to the
    preservation of order, decency, decorum, and good
    government in the public schools.
  • 1925 Gitlow vs. New York First Amendment
    applies to states via the Fourteenth Amendment

7
The Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
  • Section 1 No State shall make or enforce any
    law which shall abridge the privledges and
    immunities or citizens of the United States nor
    shall any state deprive any person of life,
    liberty, or property, without due process of law
    nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
    the equal protection of the laws.

8
The Tinker Standard
  • Tinker vs. Des Moines School District (1969)
  • Black armbands in 1965
  • Student speech cannot be censored as long as it
    does not materially disrupt class work or
    involve substantial disorder or invasion of the
    rights of others.

9
The Fraser Standard
  • Bethel School District vs. Fraser (1986)
  • Inappropriate speech for class president
  • Because school officials have an interest in
    teaching students the boundaries of socially
    appropriate behavior, they can censor student
    speech that is vulgar or indecent, even if it
    does not cause a material or substantial
    disruption.

10
The Hazelwood Standard
  • Hazelwood School District vs. Kuhlmeier (1988)
  • Censor stories in student newspaper about teen
    pregnancy and divorce
  • Censorship of school-sponsored student expression
    is permissible when school officials can show
    that it is reasonably related to legitimate
    pedagogical concerns.

11
The Frederick Standard?Morse vs. Frederick (June
25, 2007)
  • January 2002, Olympic torch travels through town
  • Principal Morse cancels school
  • Senior Frederick unveils banner on the sidewalk
    across street which reads Bong Hits 4 Jesus
  • Suspended for 10 days

12
How Would You Decide This Case?
  • What is your reasoning for Frederick?
  • What is your reasoning for Morse?
  • Which previous cases do you use for your
    argument?

13
Your Rights Outside of School
  • There is no legal justification for censoring a
    students expression in the privacy of his home.
  • For instance, a federal district court in Maine
    ruled in Smith v. Klein (1986) that school
    officials violated the constitutional rights of a
    student when they suspended him for gesturing at
    a teacher with his middle finger raised at an
    off-campus restaurant. The judge determined that
    the students disrespectful act was too
    attenuated with school functions to be
    punishable by school officials.
  • Similarly, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
    rejected school officials attempts to shut down
    an underground student newspaper sold off campus
    in Thomas v. Bd. of Ed., Granville Cent. Sch.
    District (1979), writing our willingness to
    defer to the schoolmasters expertise in
    administering school discipline, rests, in large
    measure, upon the supposition that the arm of
    authority does not reach beyond the schoolhouse
    gate.
  • Likewise, a federal district court in Washington
    ruled in Emmett v. Kent School District No. 415
    (2000) that student Internet speech created off
    campus is entirely outside of the schools
    supervision or control.

14
Three Types of Student Web Sites
  • Sites that are offensive, obnoxious and insulting
  • Sites that are offensive, obnoxious and
    insulting, and also contain some sort of veiled
    threat of violence or of destruction of property
  • Sites that contain outright blatant threat (Post
    Columbine)
  • Facebook issues at Eden Prairie and and Woodbury
    High Schools. What are your opinions?

15
Libel and Slander
  • Libel and slander are legal terms for false
    statements of fact about a person that are
    printed, broadcast, spoken or otherwise
    communicated to others. Libel generally refers
    to visual or written statements, while slander
    refers to verbal statements. The term defamation
    covers both libel and slander. For a statement
    to be defamatory, it must be more than insulting
    or offensive. It must actually harm the
    reputation of another person.
  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
  • 1960 New York Times ran a full page add about
    Martin Luther King and an Alabama tax evasion
    charge
  • Libel about the Alabama police force
  • Commissioner Sullivan requested a retraction and
    eventually sued, winning 500,000

16
Elements of Libel
  • A defamatory statement
  • Published to at least one other person (other
    than plantiff)
  • Of and concerning the plaintiff (identify
    specifically with plaintiff)
  • That is a false statement of fact (opinions are
    not libel)
  • And made with fault. The level of fault depends
    on status of plaintiff
  • Public Figures celebrities, government, etc. are
    required to prove actual malice, meaning the
    defendant know statements were false
  • Private Individuals must only show that the
    defendant was negligent, (failing to act with due
    care).
  • Libel cases are civil law and may be heard by
    juries. Monetary damages can be received as
    compensation for suffering.

17
Ethics
  • Should we believe everything we see on the news?
  • How can the news be tainted or falsified?
  • Wag the Dog and course conclusion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com