4th Rosenberg Biennial International Forum on Water Policy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

4th Rosenberg Biennial International Forum on Water Policy.

Description:

4th Rosenberg Biennial International Forum on Water Policy. Transboundary Water Cooperation The Nile Basin Case by Hon. Martha Karua Minister for Water Resources ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: LenAb7
Learn more at: https://ciwr.ucanr.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 4th Rosenberg Biennial International Forum on Water Policy.


1
4th Rosenberg Biennial International Forum on
Water Policy.
  • Transboundary Water Cooperation
  • The Nile Basin Case
  • by
  • Hon. Martha Karua
  • Minister for Water Resources Management and
    Development,Kenya Nile-COM Chair.

2
1.The Nile Basin
  • Burundi
  • D.R. Congo
  • Egypt
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • Kenya
  • Rwanda
  • Sudan
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda
  • Challenges
  • History
  • Poverty
  • Demography (600m in 2025)
  • degradation
  • Climatic Vulnerability
  • Economics-nothing flows.


3
Source UN Human Development Report 2004
Economies of Nile Countries
Country Land Area /1,000 Km2 Population 2002/Million GNP/Cap. /US Access to Electricity/
Burundi 28 6.6 102 2
DR Congo 2,350 51.2 111 1-6
Egypt 1,000 70.5 1354 98
Ethiopia 1,222 69.0 90 10
Kenya 583 31.5 393 9
Rwanda 26 8.3 212 2
Sudan 2,506 32.9 412 15
Tanzania 945 36.3 267 10
Uganda 241 25.0 236 5
4
Nile Basin Countries - Europe Electricity/HP
comparison
Popul. Mill. GNP/cap HP pot. MW HP dev. MW Elec./cap kWh/yr CO2 em. ton/c/yr
Ethiopia 61 105 45,000 700 22 0.00
Kenya 29 361 1,600 700 106 0.05
Rwanda 8 241 100 27 26 0.00
Tanzania 33 267 3,200 557 56 0.01
Uganda 22 298 2,800 278 38 0.00
Austria 8 23,333 18,300 11,700 6,457 1.51
France 59 22,128 26,000 25,200 6,539 4.32
Germany 82 22,430 8,000 5,600 5,963 4.50
Italy 58 18,808 22,800 15,267 4,732 2.98
Norway 5 36,889 47,200 27,873 24,422 3.23
5
2. Nile Cooperation.
  • Nile holds significant opportunities for
    cooperative development
  • Growing awareness at political and technical
    levels
  • Riparian states recognise benefits to gain from
    cooperation
  • Nile Basin Initiative (NBI)), 9 countries and
    Eritrea (established in 1999)
  • Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) developed a shared
    vision
  • Multi track approach dealing with a strategic
    plan and developing cooperative legal and
    institutional framework acceptable to all
  • Transitional institutional arrangement

6
The Shared Vision
  • To achieve sustainable
  • socio-economic development
  • through equitable utilization of,
  • and benefit from,
  • the common Nile Basin water resources.

7
NBI Structure
8
3. Areas of cooperation
  • Broad spectrum of areas of cooperation exist
  • Strategic Action Program to realise the vision
  • Shared vision (BASIN-WIDE)
  • Subsidiary Action Plan (SUB-BASIN)
  • Cooperation with International Community
  • International Consortium for Cooperation on the
    Nile (ICCON)
  • Development of legal and institutional framework
    acceptable to all

9
4. Confidence Building and Stakeholder\
involvement
  • Strong political support from basin countries
  • Ministerial and parliamentarians
  • Journalists, civil society and others
  • Participation at heart of Nile Basin Initiative
    (NBI) process
  • Cross sectoral and participatory approach
  • Stakeholder participation focusing on
  • Communication and Public information
  • Confidence building
  • Exchange of knowledge and information

10
5. Benefits of Cooperation
  • Four kinds
  • Benefits to the river-Ecosystem.
  • Benefits from the river-use,power..
  • Benefits that arise from reduced transaction
    cost-cooperative dev,inf.
  • Benefits beyond the river-spinoffs,
    econ.integration,

11
6. Partnership and Financing
  • Countries finance core secretariat functions,
    support in form of partnerships
  • Financing mechanisms that involve soliciting
    funds through forum called ICCOM
  • First ICCON meeting held in Geneva in 2001
  • Nile Basin Trust Fund (preferred mechanism)
  • Funding Gaps for Shared Vision Program and
    partnership grants and soft loans needed for
    subsidiary investment projects

12
8. Way Forward
  • Scaling up of investment programs for tangible
    benefits to riparian states and communities,
  • Strengthening,sustaining and broadening the
    cooperation,
  • Successful implementation of initial portfolio of
    projects to demonstrate results and benefits

13
Conclusion
  • Nile Basin Countries see cooperation and
    Co-operative action,where appropriate, as the
    best option aiming at Win-Win projects and
    benefits,
  • Cooperation is growing among countries with Nile
    waters as entry for broader and greater benefits
    including economic integration,
  • Donor support encouraging and more support
    needed-buying into the NBI Shared Vision,
  • Infrastructure investment funding challenging-
    Public financing most viable for the basin
    supported by partnership Grants/Trust Funds,and
    Soft/concessionary loans as private sector not
    attracted

14
Thank you
  • www.nilebasin.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com