Title: Short
1Short Long Run Impact of the Financial Crisis
on Potential Output
Seminar on Potential Growth Fiscal
Challenges Federal Planning Bureau (Brussels
27 October 2009) .
2Introductory Remarks
- Why is potential output so important ?
- Level of uncertainty needs to be stressed
- Presentation tries to answer three basic
questions - I. What does the literature / individual country
experiences tell us about past financial crises
their effects on potential output ? - 2. In terms of quantifying the impact of the
present crisis on potential, what can the EUs
agreed Production Function methodology and model
simulations tell us about the short, medium
long term effects of the crisis ? - 3. Given the expectation that the crisis will
have negative potential output level, possibly
growth rate, effects -what should be the role of
policy in counteracting these effects ?
31. Short Overview of Literature
Question 1 What does the literature /
individual country experiences tell us about past
financial crises their effects on potential
output ?
- Cerra and Saxena American Economic Review
(2008) - Haugh, Ollivaud Turner OECD Working Paper
(2009) - Furceri Mourougane (2009) OECD Working Paper
(2009) - Reinhart Rogoff American Economic Review
(2009 Forthcoming) - Cecchetti, Kohler Upper (2009) (Jackson Hole
Symposium)
42. What do individual country experiences tell us
about financial crises growth ?
5(No Transcript)
6Finland
7What matters for TFP is innovation (ICT
Technology Shock) Restructuring (EU KLEMS
Structural change in Finland over the 1990's
Industry shares in total value added in
1999/2000 compared with 1989/1990)
8Case of Finland shows clearly that it is not the
amount but the efficiency of investment which
counts
9Sweden
10Japan
11What are the possible lessons from Finland,
Sweden Japan ?
- Financial crises have the capacity to result in
either temporary (Fin, SW) or more longer lasting
declines in potential growth (Japan) - Finland Sweden recovery was shaped by the TFP
enhancing restructuring innovation policies
pursued by both governments - Japan highlights the dangers of allowing
banking problems to persist of avoiding
essential restructuring - Efficient allocation of capital impaired
- Weak pattern of tangible intangible investments
121. PF Method Short to Medium Term
Effects(Overview of Labour, Capital TFP
contributions to Euro Area Potential Growth)
Question 2 How can we quantify the impact of
the crisis on potential (PF Method Model
Simulations)
13 PF Method Results for Belgium
14Financial crisis makes trend TFP estimates
particularly uncertain (CU Obsolescence
RDSector level shifts)
15Short to Medium Term Effects on Euro Area
Potential Growth RatesComparison of PF results
with IMF / OECD
16 2. Medium to Long Run Model Simulations
- Overall Objective To assess the likelihood
extent of permanent level growth rate effects
from the crisis - Method adopted
- Disruptions in financial markets
- Shifts in attitudes towards risk
- Risk Premium shock
17QUEST III Simulations Risk Premium Shock(Based
on actual Interest Rate Spreads A realistic
monetary policy response setting)
18QUEST III Simulations Risk Premium Shock
19QUEST III Simulations Potential Output
Investment Effects
20Part 2 of Presentation What conclusions should
we draw from quantifying the effects ?
- Short Run (2009 / 2010) Consensus that the
crisis will have a large negative impact on
potential (PF / OECD / IMF) - Medium run Since PF method is simply based on
an extrapolation of past trends, the slow
recovery process highlighted by the OECD IMF
seems more plausible - Medium to Long Run Model Simulation Results
- Optimistic scenario (Long run level growth rate
effects are small but both negative) - Pessimistic scenario (Long run effects are
substantial) - Balanced no policy change view Permanent
level loss strong risk of a small negative
effect on potential growth rates
21Question 3 Is there a case for policy action?
(TFP already on a pre-crisis downward trend
Financial Crisis Ageing)
22A Large Agenda
23Overall Conclusions
- Past Crises Literature review / country
experiences - Financial Crises lead to prolonged, even
permanent reductions in the level of potential
output more uncertainty surrounding potential
growth rate effects - Cases of Finland Sweden highlight the
importance of TFP enhancing restructuring
innovation policies as part of an effective
crisis recovery strategy - Quantitative estimates of the long run (no policy
change) impact of the present crisis - Significant risk of a permanent loss in potential
output levels as a result of the crisis - Long run potential growth rates are also likely
to be negatively effected but the effect is
likely to be small - Uncertainty - close monitoring of potential
output developments - Financial market conditions (availability / cost
of capital) - Labour market
- TFP
- Policy response
- 5 broad strands of action EU 2020)