Title: Spine Unit , ORTHO-KKU
1Spinal Injury Spinal Cord Injury
For General Practice
- ??.????????? ????????????
- Spine Unit , ORTHO-KKU
2Outline
- Goal of spine trauma care
- Pre-hospital management
- Clinical and neurologic assessment
- Acute spinal cord injury
- Term, type and clinical characteristic
- Common cervical spine fracture and dislocation
3Goal of spine trauma care
- Protect further injury during evaluation and
management - Identify spine injury or document absence of
spine injury - Optimize conditions for maximal neurologic
recovery
4Goal of spine trauma care
- Maintain or restore spinal alignment
- Minimize loss of spinal mobility
- Obtain healed stable spine
- Facilitate rehabilitation
5Suspected Spinal Injury
- High speed crash
- Unconscious
- Multiple injuries
- Neurological deficit
- Spinal pain/tenderness
6Pre-hospital management
- Protect spine at all times during the management
of patients with multiple injuries - Up to 15 of spinal injuries have a second
(possibly non adjacent) fracture elsewhere in the
spine - Ideally, whole spine should be immobilized in
neutral position on a firm surface
7- PROTECTION ? PRIORITY
- Detection ? Secondary
-
- Log-rolling
8Pre-hospital management
- Cervical spine immobilization
- Transportation of spinal cord-injured patients
9Cervical spine immobilization
- Safe assumptions
- Head injury and unconscious
- Multiple trauma
- Fall
- Severely injured worker
- Unstable spinal column
- Hard backboard, rigid cervical collar and lateral
support (sand bag) - Neutral position
10Philadelphia hard collar
11Transportation of spinal cord-injured patients
- Emergency Medical Systems (EMS)
- Paramedical staff
- Primary trauma center
- Spinal injury center
12Clinical assessment
- Advance Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines
- Primary and secondary surveys
- Adequate airway and ventilation are the most
important factors - Supplemental oxygenation
- Early intubation is critical to limit secondary
injury from hypoxia
13Physical examination
- Information
- Mechanism
- ?energy, ?energy
- Direction of Impact
- Associated Injuries
14Is the patient awake or unexaminable?
- Whats the difference ?
- Awake
- ask/answer question
- pain/tenderness
- motor/sensory exam
- Not awake
- you can ask (but they wont answer)
- cant assess tenderness
- no motor/sensory exam
OW!
------
15 16Physical examination
- Inspection and palpation
- Occiput to Coccyx
- Soft tissue swelling and bruising
- Point of spinal tenderness
- Gap or Step-off
- Spasm of associated muscles
- Neurological assessment
- Motor, sensation and reflexes
- PR
- Do not forget the cranial nerve (C0-C1 injury)
17Neurogenic Shock
- Temporary loss of autonomic function of the cord
at the level of injury - results from cervical or high thoracic injury
- Presentation
- Flaccid paralysis distal to injury site
- Loss of autonomic function
- hypotension
- vasodilatation
- loss of bladder and bowel control
- loss of thermoregulation
- warm, pink, dry below injury site
- bradycardia
18Comparison of neurogenic and hypovolemic shock
Neurogenic Hypovolemic
Etiology Loss of sympathetic outflow Loss of blood volume
Blood pressure Hypotension Hypotension
Heart rate Bradycardia Tachycardia
Skin temperature Warm Cold
Urine output Normal Low
19Definitions of terms
- Neurologic level
- Most caudal segment with normal sensory and motor
function both sides - Skeletal level
- Radiographic level of greatest vertebral damage
- Complete injury
- Absence of sensory and motor function in the
lowest sacral segment - Incomplete injury
- Partial preservation of sensory and/or motor
function below the neurologic level
20Neurologic assessment
- Spinal shock
- Bulbocavernosus reflex
- Complete VS incomplete cord injury
- ??????????? spinal shock ??????
- Sacral sparing
- Voluntary anal sphincter control
- Toe flexor
- Perianal sensation
- Anal wink reflex
21Neurologic assessment
- American Spinal Injury Association grade
- Grade A E
- American Spinal Injury Association score
- Motor score (total 100 points)
- Key muscles 10 muscles
- Sensory score (total 112 points)
- Key sensory points 28 dermatomes
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Incomplete cord injury
- Anterior cord syndrome
- Brown-Sequard syndrome
- Central cord syndrome
25Anterior cord syndrome
- Loss of motor, pain and temperature
- Preserved propioception and deep touch
26Brown-Sequard syndrome
- Loss of ipsilateral motor and propioception
- Loss of contralateral pain and temperature
27Central cord syndrome
- Weakness
- upper gt lower
- Variable sensory loss
- Sacral sparing
28Radiographic imaging
- Who needs an x- ray of the spine ?
- NEXUS -The National Emergency X- Radiograph
Utilization Study - Prospective study to validate a rule for the
decision to obtain cervical spine x- ray in
trauma patients - Hoffman, N Engl J Med 2000 34394-99
- Canadian C-Spine rules
- Prospective study whereby patients were evaluated
for 20 standardized clinical findings as a basis
for formulating a decision as to the need for
subsequent cervical spine radiography - Stiell I. JAMA. 2001 2861841-1846
29NEXUS
- NEXUS Criteria
- 1. Absence of tenderness in the posterior
midline - 2. Absence of a neurological deficit
- 3. Normal level of alertness (GCS score 15)
- 4. No evidence of intoxication (drugs or
alcohol) - 5. No distracting injury/pain
30NEXUS
- Patient who fulfilled all 5 of the criteria were
considered low risk for C-spine injury - ? No need C-spine X-ray
- For patients who had any of the 5 criteria
- ? radiographic imaging was indicated
- ( AP, lateral and open mouth views)
31The Canadian C-spine Rule for alert and stable
trauma patients where cervical spine injury is a
concern.
- Any high-risk factor that mandates radiography?
- Agegt65yrs or
- Dangerous mechanism or
- Paresthesia in extremities
NO
YES
Any low-risk factor that allows safe assessment
of range of motion? Simple rear-end MVC, or
Sitting position in ER, or Ambulatory at any
time, or Delayed onset of neck pain, or
Absence of midline C-spine tenderness
NO
Radiography
YES
UNABLE
Able to actively rotate neck? 45 degrees left
and right
ABLE
No Radiography
32National Emergency XRadiography Utilization
Study(NEXUS)
The Canadian C-spine rule
- Both have
- Excellent negative predictive value for excluding
patients identified as low risk
33Clearance of Cervical Spine Injury inConscious,
Symptomatic Patients
- Radiological evaluation of the cervical spine is
indicated for all patients who do not meet the
criteria for clinical clearance as described
above - 2. Imaging studies should be technically adequate
and interpreted by experienced clinicians
34Cervical Spine Imaging Options
- Plain films
- AP, lateral and open mouth view
- Optional Oblique and Swimmers
- CT
- Better for occult fractures
- MRI
- Very good for spinal cord, soft tissue and
ligamentous injuries - Flexion-Extension Plain Films
- to determine stability
35Radiolographic evaluation
- X-ray Guidelines (cervical)
- AABBCDS
- Adequacy, Alignment
- Bone abnormality, Base of skull
- Cartilage
- Disc space
- Soft tissue
36Adequacy
- Must visualize entire C-spine
- A film that does not show the upper border of T1
is inadequate - Caudal traction on the arms may help
- If can not, get swimmers view or CT
37Swimmers view
38Alignment
- The anterior vertebral line, posterior vertebral
line, and spinolaminar line should have a smooth
curve with no steps or discontinuities - Malalignment of the posterior vertebral bodies
is more significant than that anteriorly, which
may be due to rotation - A step-off of gt3.5mm is
- significant anywhere
39Lateral Cervical Spine X-Ray
- Anterior subluxation of one vertebra on another
indicates facet dislocation - lt 50 of the width of a vertebral body ?
unilateral facet dislocation - gt 50 ? bilateral facet dislocation
40Bones
41Disc
- Disc Spaces
- Should be uniform
- Assess spaces between the spinous processes
42Soft tissue
- Nasopharyngeal space (C1)
- 10 mm (adult)
- Retropharyngeal space (C2-C4)
- 5-7 mm
- Retrotracheal space (C5-C7)
- 14 mm (children)
- 22 mm (adults)
43AP C-spine Films
- Spinous processes should line up
- Disc space should be uniform
- Vertebral body height should be uniform. Check
for oblique fractures.
44Open mouth view
- Adequacy all of the dens and lateral borders of
C1 C2 - Alignment lateral masses of C1 and C2
- Bone Inspect dens for lucent fracture lines
45CT Scan
- Thin cut CT scan should be used to evaluate
abnormal, suspicious or poorly visualized areas
on plain film - The combination of plain film and directed CT
scan provides a false negative rate of less than
0.1
46MRI
- Ideally all patients with abnormal neurological
examination should be evaluated with MRI scan
47Management of SCI
- Primary Goal
- Prevent secondary injury
- Immobilization of the spine begins in the initial
assessment - Treat the spine as a long bone
- Secure joint above and below
- Caution with partial spine splinting
48Management of SCI
- Spinal motion restriction immobilization devices
- ABCs
- Increase FiO2
- Assist ventilations as needed with c-spine
control - Indications for intubation
- Acute respiratory failure
- GCS lt9
- Increased RR with hypoxia
- PCO2 gt 50
- VC lt 10 mL/kg
- IV Access fluids titrated to BP 90-100 mmHg
49Management of SCI
- Look for other injuries Life over Limb
- Transport to appropriate SCI center once
stabilized - Consider high dose methylprednisolone
- Controversial as recent evidence questions
benefit - Must be started lt 8 hours of injury
- Do not use for penetrating trauma
- 30 mg/kg bolus over 15 minute
- After bolus infusion 5.4mg/kg IV for 23 hours
50Principle of treatment
- Spinal alignment
- deformity/subluxation/dislocation ?reduction
- Spinal column stability
- unstable ? stabilization
- Neurological status
- neurological deficit ? decompression
51Jefferson Fracture
- Burst fracture of C1 ring
- Unstable fracture
- Increased lateral ADI on lateral film if ruptured
transverse ligament and displacement of C1
lateral masses on open mouth view - Need CT scan
52Burst Fracture
- Fracture of C3-C7 from axial loading
- Spinal cord injury is common from posterior
displacement of fragments into the spinal canal - Unstable
53Clay Shovelers Fracture
- Flexion fracture of spinous process
- C7gtC6gtT1
- Stable fracture
54Flexion Teardrop Fracture
- Flexion injury causing a fracture of the
anteroinferior portion of the vertebral body - Unstable because usually associated with
posterior ligamentous injury
55Bilateral Facet Dislocation
- Flexion injury
- Subluxation of dislocated vertebra of greater
than ½ the AP diameter of the vertebral body
below it - High incidence of spinal cord injury
- Extremely unstable
56Hangmans Fracture
- Extension injury
- Bilateral fractures of C2 pedicles
- (white arrow)
-
- Anterior dislocation of C2 vertebral body (red
arrow) - Unstable
57Odontoid Fractures
- Complex mechanism of injury
- Generally unstable
- Type 1 fracture through the tip
- Rare
- Type 2 fracture through the base
- Most common
- Type 3 fracture through the base and body of axis
- Best prognosis
58Odontoid Fracture Type II
59Odontoid Fracture Type III
60Thank you for your attention