Title: The History of DNA
1The History of DNA
- Mark Mayo
- Cypress College
Last update 9/16/13
2Transformation Frederick Griffith (1923)
- Used healthy mice
- Mice were injected with either R(rough) strain of
Streptococcus pneumoniae. The mice live and
their immune system kills R bacteria. No live
bacteria - Mice injected with the S (smooth) strain of
Streptococcus pneumoniae. The mice die. The
dead mice have live S bacteria. - Mice injected with heat-killed S strain. Mice
live with no live bacteria found in mice. - Mice injected with mixture of live R strain and
heat-killed S strain. Mice die and live S strain
bacteria are found in the dead mice. - Heat does not destroy the active factor that is
responsible for heredity (DNA). - It is said that the bacteria were transformed by
this active agent.
3Transformation Frederick Griffith (1923)
4Transformation II Avery, McCarty, Macleod (1944)
Think re-mix of Griffith
- Repeated Griffiths work, but knew that DNA was
the substance of transformation - Separated classes molecules from s cell debris
- Tested each fraction for transforming ability,
one at a time - Only DNA transformed r cells into s cells
- To provide r cells with s DNA is to provide r
cells with s genes
5Transformation II Avery, McCarty, Macleod (1944)
6DNA or Protein as Active Agent Alfred Hershey and
Martha Chase (1950s)
- Used radioactive labels on bacteriophage
components to decide if DNA or protein was the
transforming factor - Label viral protein with S35
- Label viral DNA with P32
- Allow infection
- Wash viral particles (with blender!)
- Check for label after subsequent infection into
new bacteria - Found only P32
- Hence DNA is the transforming factor
7DNA or Protein as Active Agent Alfred Hershey and
Martha Chase
8Chargaffs RulesErwin Chargaff (1949)
- He studied the relative amounts of each nucleic
acid base in a great variety of plant and animal
species - Roughly found that AT and GC, but not exactly
due to errors in the technology! - Purines are exactly equal to pyrimidines
- His methodology for the time was good, but now we
get exact amounts - He could not make the connection (Watson and
Crick used his data however)
9Chargaffs Rules Erwin Chargaff (1949)
10Alpha HelixLinus Pauling (1948-1950)
- Worked with proteins and determined that collagen
has a helical arrangement for its polypeptides - He called the helix an alpha helix
- He suspected that DNA might also have a helical
arrangement, but could not get it to compute with
a single strand - Pauling suggested DNA had a triple helix, but had
no proof - Watson and Crick heard his idea about a helix
11Alpha HelixLinus Pauling (1948-1950)
12X Ray DiffractionMaurice Wilkins and Rosalyn
Franklin
- Used Xray diffraction to study proteins and other
molecules - DNA was very difficult to crystallize and a tough
candidate for Xray diffraction - Rosalyn Franklin was a very talented graduate
student in the lab of Wilkins - She was successful at crystallizing DNA in two
forms A and B - The forms on an X was seen indicating some kind
of helix - She could measure the distances between repeating
units on the molecule - She could also measure the diameter of the
molecule - Wilkins sent her unpublished data to Watson and
Crick without her permission - She died before the Nobel prize or she might have
shared it
13X Ray DiffractionMaurice Wilkins and Rosalyn
Franklin
14Semi-conservative DNA Replication Matthew
Meselsohn and Frank Stahl
- They used two isotopes of Nitrogen 14N and 15N
- 15N is heavier than 14N
- They grew bacteria for several generations in
heavy 15N (all DNA would be heavy!) - Abruptly changed the medium to lighter 14N for
one or two generations - Used density-gradient ultracentrifugation to
separate the DNA strands by weight - After one generation all DNA was medium between
heavy and light (thus SEMI-CONSERVATIVE) - After two generation DNA had two bands medium
and light.
15Semi-conservative DNA Replication Matthew
Meselsohn and Frank Stahl
This one would be one heavy and one light band
Half light and half heavy medium weight
16Discontinuous DNA ReplicationReiji Okazaki
- He knew about DNA polymerase
- It moves from 5 to 3 only on the leading strand
- He searched for a second polymerase that worked
in the reverse direction - After unsuccessfully searching he used his
brilliance - Found numerous small fragments and also long
segments as DNA was replicated - Finally decided that the short segments were from
the lagging strand - DNA polymerase worked on both sides continuously
on the leading strand and in several places on
the lagging strand - DNA ligase connects the small portions (now
called Okazaki fragments) on the lagging strand
17Discontinuous DNA ReplicationReiji Okazaki