Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds

Description:

Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: GregoryWa2
Learn more at: http://wvgis.wvu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds


1
Soil Movement in West VirginiaWatersheds
  • A GIS
  • Assessment

Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang
2
A little about me.
  • Native West Virginian
  • Pocahontas County
  • B.S. in Forest Resource Management
  • Seeking M.S. Forestry
  • Very interested in Forestry and GIS Analysis!

3
Issue
  • Sedimentation
  • Soil movement can cause lots of damage especially
    when its moving into water resources.
  • Pollution of streams, Raise flood levels, Raise
    stream temperatures, Degrade site/stream quality
    and Productivity, and reduce navigational
    abilities.
  • Sediment created from Silvicultural Operations is
    the issue at hand.

4
Project Description
  • Problems
  • Soil Movement, specifically sedimentation, is
    very detrimental to streams and forested sites.
  • Pollution to Water Resources
  • Site Degradation-Both Environmentally and
    Aesthetically
  • Habitat and Productivity Loss-Both Onsite and
    Downstream
  • Assess Best Management Practices (BMP)
    Functionality
  • GOAL FIND SIGNIFICANT SOIL MOVEMENT CONTRIBUTORS
    and IDENTIFY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WATERSHEDS

5
Project Study Area
  • Two Watersheds located in Tucker County, WV
  • Both Similar in
  • Geologic and
  • Physical Makeup.
  • Slopes
  • Elevations
  • Land-cover
  • etc

6
(No Transcript)
7
Project Description
  • Study designed to evaluate soil movement and its
    relation to logging.
  • Two Watersheds (Control and Treatment)
  • Silt-fence Installed around all Streams
  • Material Removed Once a Year
  • Extensive Mapping Procedures
  • Classification/Regression Trees to Model and/or
    Predict Sedimentation

8
(No Transcript)
9
Silt-fence Installation
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Data Collection and Recording
13
Total Oven-Dry Material
Burn sub-samples, calculate average percent
mineral (Mostly Organic)
Manually separate predominantly mineral from
predominantly organic
Place in water (Mostly Mineral)
Apply average percent to predominantly organic
fraction weight
Oven Dry and Burn
Pour off and discard
Mineral associated with predominantly organic
fraction
Mineral associated with predominantly mineral
fraction
Total Sediment
14
Methods
  • Use GIS to identify Landscape elements in each
    watershed that contribute to soil movement. (i.e.
    Disturbance, Moisture, Slope, Soil Types, etc)
  • Calculations Derived From Digital Elevation Map
  • Slope, Aspect, Flow Direction, Flow Accumulation,
    Moisture Index, Distance Grids (from road, from
    stream, etc.), Soils, Land-cover, etc Many
    Variables!
  • Analysis Performed Using Various Extensions of
    the ESRI ArcMap 9.1 GIS program. As well as the
    newly developed 3-Meter DEM and Aerial
    Photography from the WV GIS Tech-center.
  • Statistical Method-Classification Trees
  • R Statistical Package

15
Inputs ---
Tools ---
Output Grids ---
16
Sediment a function of
  • Sediment Reaching Silt-fence
  • F (Slope, Distance From Silt-fence, Distance From
    Disturbance, Distance From Slope Breaks,
    Moisture, Aspect, Accumulation, Soil Type,
    Vegetation, Land-use, )
  • Very Dynamic Subject

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Ecological Land Units (ELU)Moisture Index
  • This index assumes that the relative moisture in
    a particular area (in this case a grid cell)
    primarily depends on two factors
  • How much water is flowing into the area and how
    fast the water can flow out of the area.
  • Ln (catchment area 1) / (slope 1)
  • The created index is a relative one so the
    numbers dont represent any type of units.
  • Higher Positive Numbers are Wetter
  • Lower Negative Numbers are Drier
  • Strager (2006)

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Analyses Performed
  • Also
  • Classification Tree Modeling Technique
  • Statistical Analyses (S-plus and R Statistics
    Systems)
  • Future Analyses
  • Stream Loading-Sediment
  • Refining of Classification Tree Modeling
  • Key to possibly modeling the soil movement or
    sedimentation

28
Results
  • According to the Statistical Modeling R
  • Slope is the most important variable
  • 21.58º
  • Followed by
  • Moisture- 3.62 (Range -4.3 7.6)
  • Aspect- 141º
  • Combined Grids Using Raster Calculator
  • Model Refinement to Include more Variables Coming
    Soon!

29
(No Transcript)
30
Conclusions
  • 3-Meter DEM much higher accuracy!
  • 14800 scale aerial photography gives great
    visual representation!
  • Leads to more thorough analysis.
  • Detailed 3-D Representation.
  • Hydrology Tools Very Influential
  • Upon Completion of Analyses
  • Identify Contributors to Soil Movement
  • Order there level of Importance
  • Assess current Best Management Practices (BMP)
  • Model/Predict Soil Loss

31
Thank You
  • Any Questions?

32
References
  • (Grayson et al. 1992 Mitasova 1996 Moore, I.
    D. et al. 1988 Boer et al. 1996, OLoughlin
    1986, Parker 1982)
  • Strager 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com