PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 3

Description:

What are We Talking About? What is Morality? Rachels Chapter 1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: ursula
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 3


1
PHIL 2525Contemporary Moral IssuesLec 3
  • What are We Talking About?
  • What is Morality? Rachels Chapter 1

2
Singular Moral Judgments vs. Moral Principles...
3
The Death of SocratesJacques-Louis David
4
General moral principleor not?
  • Hurting a friend is wrong.
  • The Bible says that thou shalt not kill.
  • Shoplifting might get you into trouble.
  • Stealing is ok.
  • Helping others helps ourselves.
  • Do unto others as you would have them do unto
    you.
  • Honour thy father and thy mother.

5
General moral principleor not?
  • Hurting a friend is wrong.
  • The Bible says that thou shalt not kill.
  • Shoplifting might get you into trouble.
  • Stealing is ok.
  • Helping others helps ourselves.
  • Do unto others as you would have them do unto
    you.
  • Honour thy father and thy mother.
  • Yes
  • No
  • No
  • Yes
  • No
  • Yes
  • Yes

6
  • Conflicting principles...

7
So, back to our arguments...
  • Premise 1 states the case (the way the world is)
  • Premise 2 appends a moral principle
  • ------------------------------------------
  • The conclusion follows from the interplay

8
Moral arguments are arguments with a moral
judgment as the conclusion
  • We describe the case the way the world is
  • We append a moral principle
  • ------------------------------------------
  • We conclude based on the interplay

9
1.1 The Problem of Definition
  • Moral philosophy is the attempt to achieve a
    systematic understanding of the nature of
    morality and what it requires of us
  • Socrates We are discussing no small matter,
    but how we ought to live

10
1.2 Baby Theresa.....Anencephaly
11
1.2 Baby Theresa dilemma...
  • Parental request allow her organs to be
    harvested to benefit other newborns.
  • Legal resolution "Florida law does not allow the
    removal of organs until the donor is dead."

12
Moral arguments are arguments with a moral
judgment as the conclusion
  • The parents
  • Transplanting Baby Theresas organs would benefit
    other children without harming her.
  • If we can benefit someone, without harming anyone
    else, we ought to do so.
  • --------------------------------------
  • Therefore, we ought to transplant the organs.

13
Moral arguments are arguments with a moral
judgment as the conclusion
  • Anonymous ethicists
  • Transplanting Baby Theresas organs would be
    using her as means for anothers ends.
  • It is wrong to use people as means.
  • --------------------------------------
  • Therefore, we ought not transplant the organs.

14
Moral arguments are arguments with a moral
judgment as the conclusion
  • One more argument
  • Taking Baby Theresa's organs would be killing her
    to save another.
  • It is wrong to kill one person to save another.
  • -------------------------------------------------
    -----------------------------
  • Therefore, we ought not to take her organs for
    transplantation.

15
On the Baby Theresa dilemma...
  • Dr. Norman Fost, director of the University
  • of Wisconsin's medical ethics program
  • The problem is almost entirely one of a slippery
    slope...
  • We have to be careful who we take organs from,
    because there are a lot more than anencephalic
    infants out there.

16
On the Baby Theresa dilemma...
  • Dr. John Fletcher, director of the University
  • of Virginia's Center for Biomedical Ethics
  • There's a refusal to accept the reality of death
    at work in this...
  • ...and an overvitalistic understanding of
    personhood, one dependent on biological
    functions."

17
On the Baby Theresa dilemma...
  • Dr. John Fletcher, director of the University
  • of Virginia's Center for Biomedical Ethics
  • ...what makes us human is what goes on upstairs
    in the brain, not downstairs in the brain.

18
1.3 Conjoined Twins
  • Siamese Twins
  • Chang and Eng
  • Born in 1811
  • Travelled with the circus
  • Married two sisters
  • Fathered 21 children
  • Died in 1874

19
13 Jodie and Mary
20
Jodie and Mary
  • Pro-separation
  • Separating the twins will save the one otherwise
    both will die.
  • When it's a choice between saving one of two
    people or letting both die, we should save the
    one.
  • -------------------------------------------------
    ---------
  • . The twins should be separated.

21
Jodie and Mary
  • Anti-separation
  • Mary is an innocent human being and the
    separation will kill her.
  • It's wrong to kill an innocent human being.
  • -------------------------------------------
  • . The twins shouldn't be separated.

22
1.4 The Latimer Case
23
Mercy or Murder?
  • 12 year old Tracy Latimer, killed by her father
    in 1993
  • Quadriplegic and severely mentally disabled, she
    functioned at the level of a three-month old and
    was in constant pain

24
1.4 The Latimer Case
  • Argument against Latimers action
  • Killing Tracy was discrimination against the
    handicapped.
  • It is wrong to discriminate against the
    handicapped.
  • --------------------------------------
  • . Tracy's father did wrong he shouldn't have
    killed her.

25
1.4 The Latimer Case
  • Rachels response
  • Discrimination against the handicapped?
  • Its discrimination only if there is no good
    reason for the different treatment....

26
1.4 The Latimer Case
  • Euthanizing Tracy was "opening the doors to other
    people to decide who should live and who should
    die."
  • It is wrong to do things which would open the
    doors...
  • --------------------------------------------------
    ----
  • . Euthanizing Tracy was wrong and shouldn't have
    been done.

27
1.5 Reason and Impartiality
  1. Moral judgments must be backed by good reasons.
  2. Morality requires the impartial consideration of
    each individuals interests.

28
1.5 Reason and Impartiality
  • We describe the case the way the world is
  • We append a moral principle
  • ------------------------------------------
  • We conclude based on the interplay

29
Impartiality...and emotion...
30
Impartiality...and emotion...
31
Impartiality...and emotion...
32
Impartiality...and emotion...
33
The morally right thing to do...
  • is always whatever there are the best reasons for
    doing...

34
Jane Addams,founder of Hull House
  • The essence of immorality is the tendency to make
    an exception of myself.

35
1.6 The Minimum Conception of Morality
  • The effort to guide ones conduct by reason...to
    do what there are the best reasons for doing...
  • James Rachels

36
Suicide and Euthanasia
  • What is the difference?
  • What good reasons are there in favour?
  • What good reasons are there against?
    http//exitinternational.net/

37
Ethics in the news
  • Globe and Mail
  • Sept. 28, 2011
  • Ontario's 'Baby Joseph' dies at home after
    sparking fierce end-of-life ethical debate

38
Attendance Question
  • Your name
  • Your year in school
  • Your major
  • Where do you want to be in 10 years?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com