Sakai Update

1
Sakai Update

• Suzanne Thorin
• Dean of University Libraries, Indiana University
• James L. Hilton
• Associate Provost, University of Michigan

2
Around the middle of 2003

• Indiana, Stanford, MIT and U Michigan had all
  developed learning management systems, which were
  approaching EOL, and were talking internally
  about NG systems
• The Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI) at MIT was
  developing APIs for learning management systems -
  involving many universities (UMichigan, IndianaU,
  Stanford, and MIT were all strong participants)
• Java Community Process (JCP) produced JSR-168 -
  The unified portal standard API
• Oasis developed the Web Services for Remote
  Portals (WSRP) standard
• The open-source uPortal portal project had
  quietly moved into the 1 open source portal (4
  including commercial vendors) position

3
Why we went down the Sakai path

• Legacy system with no positive trajectory forward
• Saw market consolidation in CMS
• Saw the potential of tapping core competence and
  starting a virtuous cycle of development/teaching/
  research
• Strategic desire to blur the distinction between
  the laboratory/classroom between knowledge
  creation/digestion
• NRC report and the need for collaboration
• A moment in time opportunity (Mellon and
  synchronization)
• Leverage links between open source, open access
  and culture of the academy/wider world

4
The Sakai Project

• The University of Michigan, MIT, Stanford,
  Indiana University, and now over 45 other
  universities have joined in an international
  effort to develop the next generation of software
  infrastructure and tools to support research and
  teaching.
• Complete Course Management System
• Research Support Collaboration System,
• Enterprise Services-based Portal,

5
What is SAKAI?

• Sakai ? Course Management System
• Sakai Collaboration Learning Environment

Use for teaching/learning/research and many other
online group activities.
6
Supporting the Class
7
Supporting the Lab
8
Bringing the lab to the classroom
9
Sakai Project Core Universities

• Each of the 4 Core Universities Commits
• 5 developers/architects, etc. under Sakai Board
  project direction for 2 years
• Public commitment to implement Sakai
• Open/Open licensing Community Source
• So, overall project levels
• 4.4M in institutional staff (27 FTE)
• 2.4M Mellon, 300K Hewlett
• Additional investment through partners

10
Sakai Project Timeline
11
Sakai Project Deliverables

• Working Code CMS/CLE- Collaboration and
  Learning Environment Sakai 1.0
• Course management system core tools plus
• Quizzing and assessment tools, ePortfolio from
  OSPI, etc
• Research collaboration system
• Portal (uPortal 2.3, 3.x)
• Modular tools - also pre-integrated to work out
  of the box
• Tool Portability Profile
• Specifications for writing portable software to
  achieve application code mobility among
  institutions modular tools and services
• Synchronized development, adoptions at Michigan,
  Indiana, MIT, Stanford Sakai 1.0 is the next
  generation for CourseWork, CHEF, Oncourse,
  Stellar

12
In production use With gt22,000 users at U
Michigan
Limited Pilot at IU nowFull Pilot in January
13
Integration of Contentand ServicesStill More
than One Click Away

• Suzanne E. Thorin
• University Dean of Libraries and Associate Vice
  President for Digital Library Development
• Indiana University
• December 7, 2004

14
2003 Campus Computing Project

• 94 of colleges and universities were using one
  or more commercial courseware systems
• 40 of the courses being taught were using
  courseware tools
• Current developments
• Open access online learning environment
• E-portfolios
• Portals
• Content management systems
• Student information systems

15
Academic Technology Environment

• Why IT Has Not Paid Off As We Had Hoped (Yet)
• Authors
• Edward L. Ayers
• Charles M. Grisham

http//www.itc.virginia.edu/virginia.edu/spring04/
hope.htm
16
Academic Technology Environment

• American higher education has created a doughnut
  IT infrastructure all periphery and no center.
  (Ayers/Grisham)

17
Sakai Partners andSEPP Members

• Ohio State University
• Princeton University
• State University of New York
• University of Arizona
• University of California, Berkeley
• University of California, Davis
• University of California, Los Angeles
• University of California, Santa Barbara
• University of Colorado at Boulder
• University of Delaware
• University of Hawaii
• University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
• University of Oklahoma
• University of Texas, Austin
• University of Virginia
• University of Washington
• University of Wisconsin, Madison
• Yale University

• Sakai Project Founders
• Indiana University
• JA-SIG
• MIT
• OKI
• Stanford University
• University of Michigan
• ARL SEPP Members
• Arizona State University
• Brown University
• Columbia University
• Cornell University
• Dartmouth
• Georgetown University
• Harvard University
• Johns Hopkins University
• New York University
• Northwestern University

18
Partners and Cultures

• Why should we do this and why do it together?

19
(No Transcript)
20
Digital Journals and Books
University of Michigan Humanities Text Initiative
21
Digital Text
University of Iowa and University of Nebraska
Walt Whitman Archive
University of Virginia Thomas Jefferson Digital
Archive
22
Digital Images
Duke University Papyrus Archive
Indiana University Charles W. Cushman Photograph
Collection
23
(No Transcript)
24
Sheet Music
Indiana University Sheet Music Collection
25
Music Scores
Indiana University Cook Music Library
26
Geographical Numerical Data
Modified crime index (crime index and
arson) Absolute number
Areaname 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Alameda, CA 96,108 108,283 109,500 109,680 105,005 62,487
Alpine, CA 149 81 132 176 211 154
Amador, CA 721 776 776 852 840 831
Butte, CA 8,852 9,150 10,184 9,618 10,522 9,974
Calaveras, CA 1,092 1,089 1,238 1,153 1,210 1,663
Colusa, CA 572 701 657 657 678 628
Contra Costa, CA 48,614 51,772 50,932 50,575 50,535 46,549
Del Norte, CA 1,043 963 986 1,090 1,267 1,521
El Dorado, CA 4,945 5,180 5,205 5,222 5,481 5,256
Fresno, CA 55,409 62,592 64,220 61,286 66,457 66,671
Glenn, CA 851 866 969 1,079 1,231 1,272
Humboldt, CA 5,958 5,800 6,514 7,814 9,290 9,253
Imperial, CA 8,374 8,160 8,877 8,681 8,445 8,167
Inyo, CA 731 706 593 570 736 770
Kern, CA 35,736 37,235 38,124 39,622 39,616 35,964
27
Environment Complexities

• Digital Library Content and Course Management
  SystemsIssues of Interoperation,
• Report of a study group
• Co-Chairs
• Dale Flecker, Associate Director for Planning
  Systems, Harvard University Library
• Neil McLean, Director, IMS Australia

http//www.diglib.org/pubs/cmsdl0407/
28
Current Efforts

• IMS Learning Global Consortium

http//www.imsglobal.org/
29
http//www.diglib.org/aquifer/index.htm
30
Creating Content

• At various points, they write, leading
  professional, corporate, and philanthropic
  organizations have stepped up to the partner with
  teachers and students. . . But there is still a
  disappointing lack of support for digital
  materials for teaching and scholarship. In
  general, reference materials, textbook ancillary.
  . . Teaching modules are being produced in a sort
  of desktop-publishing model. . . Individual
  faculty, but no group is working with faculty and
  academic leaders to create content that faculty
  will respect as real aids in teaching and
  scholarship. . . The massive investment in
  networks and computers will not pay off until we
  fill in the hole, until we work together to
  create content. (Ayers/Grisham)

31
--Dale Flecker and Neil McLean, Digital Library
Content and Course Management Systems Issues of
Interoperation
32
Bibliography

• Ayers, Edward L. and Charles M. Grisham. Why IT
  Has Not Paid Off As We Had Hoped (Yet),
  virginia.edu, (Spring 2004), http//www.itc.virgin
  ia.edu/virgnia.edu/spring04/hope.htm.
• Bell, Stephen J. and John D. Shank. Linking the
  Library to Courseware A Strategic Alliance to
  Improve Learning Outcomes, Library Issues, 252
  (November 2004) 1-4.
• Duncan, Jim. Convergence of Libraries, Digital
  Repositories, and Web Content Management,
  Educause Review, 396 (November/December 2004),
  http//www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/DEC0401.pdf
  .
• Flecker, Dale and Neil McLean. Digital Library
  Content and Course Management Systems Issues of
  Interoperation Report of a Study Group. Digital
  Library Federation (July 2004),
  http//www.diglib.org/pubs/cmsdl0407/.
• McLean, Neil and Clifford Lynch.
  Interoperability between Information and
  Learning EnvironmentsBridging the Gaps. A Joint
  White Paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning
  Consortium and the Coalition for Networked
  Information, (June 2003), http//www.imsglobal.org
  /DLims_white_paper_publicdraft_1.pdf.
• Persons, Jerry C. Unpublished Digital Library
  Federation Aquifer report.

33
Demo Sites

• Sakai - Collab.sakaiproject.org running Sakai
  1.0 system open
• Sakaiproject.org open info site gateway to DGs
  and public forums
• Ctools can get login if you want to evaluate
  and see production system very similar to
  collab.sakaiproject.org