Title: Access in Pediatric CRRT
1Access in Pediatric CRRT
- Patrick D Brophy MD
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis Transplantation
- CS Mott Childrens Hospital
- University of Michigan
2The System is Down due to poor Access!
3My first choice is.
4Access
- If you dont have it you might as well go home.
- This is the most important aspect of CVVH
therapy. - Adequacy.
- Filter life.
- Increased blood loss.
- Staff satisfaction.
5Vascular Access
- Ideal Catheter Characteristics
- Easy Insertion
- Permits Adequate Blood Flow without Vessel Damage
- Minimal Technical Flaws
- High Recirculation Rate
- Kinking
- Shorter and Larger Catheters
- SIZE DOES MATTER
- Lower Resistance
- Improved Bloodflow
6Pediatric CRRT Vascular AccessPerformance
Blood Flow
- Minimum 30 to 50 ml/min to minimize access and
filter clotting - Maximum rate of 400 ml/min/1.73m2 or
- 10-12 ml/kg/min in neonates and infants
- 4-6 ml/kg/min in children
- 2-4 ml/kg/min in adolescents
7(No Transcript)
8Venous Access for CRRT
- Match catheter size to patient size and
anatomical site - One dual- or triple-lumen or two single lumen
uncuffed catheters - Sites
- femoral
- internal jugular
- avoid sub-clavian vein if possible
9Catheter Position
- No Right or Wrong Choice of Placement
- FACTORS
- Clinical expertise
- Body Habitus
- Other catheters (Citrate anticoag-triple
preferred) - Coagulopathy
- Intra-abdominal distension
10Catheter Position
- Internal Jugular-Right- aim for RA to secure
adequate BFR - Subclavian-Patient mobility? Most frequent site
of inadequate performance -catheter curves and
abutts against SVC-Vein collapses against
catheter due to positional/volume change - Femoral- optimal position in tip of IVC
11Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT Pros and Cons
of Femoral Site
PROS
CONS
- Relatively larger vessel may allow for
- larger catheter
- higher flows
- Ease of placement
- No risk of pneumothorax
- Preserve potential future vessels for chronic HD
- Shorter femoral catheters with increased
recirculation - Poor performance in patients with
ascites/increased abdominal pressure - Trauma to venous anastamosis site for future
transplant
12Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT Pros and Cons
of IJ/SCV Site
PROS
CONS
- Tip placement in right atrium decreases
recirculation - Not affected by ascites
- Preserve potential vein needed for transplant
- SCV stenosis (SCV)
- Superior vena cava syndrome
- Risk of pneumothorax in patients with high PEEP
- Trauma to veins needed potentially for future HD
access
13Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
- 26 femoral
- 19 gt 20 cm
- 7 lt 20cm
- 13 IJ
- Qb 250 ml/min (ultrasound dilution)
- Recirculation measurement by ultrasound dilution
method
Little et al AJKD 361135-9, 2000
14Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
Type Number Qb (ml/min) Recirculation() 95 CI
Femoral 26 237.1 13.1 7.6 to 18.6
gt 20cm 19 233.3 8.5 2.9 to 13.7
lt 20cm 7 247.5 26.3 17.1 to 35.5
Jugular 13 226.4 0.4 -0.1 to 1.0
plt0.001 plt0.007
Little et al AJKD 361135-9, 2000
15Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
Pediatrics
P value NS NS NS NS
(Gardner et al, CRRT 1997Quinton 8 Fr n 20
120 Treatments)
16Troubleshooting Access
- How can you tell if you have a problem before
starting? - Check placement first, then use syringe to test
resistance and blood return.
- What if you have problems during treatment?
- Check line for kink, then assess patients
position or need for sedation.
17Access
- Clotting or sluggish catheter.
- tPA (tissue plasminogen activator).
- (Spry et al.,
DialysisTransplantation. Jan. 2001). - Normal saline flush.
- Reason to replace catheter.
- Clotted catheter with no response to tPA.
- Exit site blood leakage with no response to
pressure dressing. - Severe kinked catheter.
- Bad re-circulation issues.
18Pressures
- Arterial or outflow pressures
- High negative pressure access problem.
- High positive pressure filter problem.
- Moderate to high positive pressure high return
(venous) pressure access problem. - Venous or return pressures
- Moderate to high positive pressure high
arterial pressure filter problem. - High return pressure moderate arterial pressure
access
19Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRTSome Final
Thoughts
- Catheters with poor function will function
poorly over and over and over and over - Balance between surgical/ICU expertise
(preference?) and the necessary evils dictated by
the patient - high PEEP femoral catheter?
- massive ascites IJ catheter?
- available sites are there any?
- Which vessel are you willing to traumatize?
20Conclusions
- Poor Access-- May as well stop
- Choice- patient size and optimal flows
- Site- IJ/Femoral -recommended
- Care- Local standard Lock issues- heparin
- Troubleshooting- anticipate, what is the machine
saying? - Happy Hemofiltering!
21Thanks!
- Stu Goldstein
- Tim Bunchman
- Theresa Mottes
- Tim Kudelka
- Betsy Adams
- Tammy Kelly
- Robin Nievaard