Lecture 21 Don DeVoretz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 21 Don DeVoretz

Description:

Lecture 21 Don DeVoretz Industrialization: A Strategy for Development ? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: DonDeV5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 21 Don DeVoretz


1
Lecture 21Don DeVoretz
  • Industrialization
  • A Strategy for Development ?

2
Debate 1 Multinationals
  • Pros and Cons of Multi-nationals
  • The argued benefits from Multi-national
    Corporations operating in your country are
  • fill savings gaps, provide foreign exchange,
    government revenue, management skills and
  • technology which all will lead to further growth.

3
Debate 1 cont
  • The counter arguments are that
  • capital is raised locally,
  • little profits are reinvested, and tax avoiding
    transfers
  • Which point of view appears appropriate for your
    country?
  • What is the evidence to support above?
  • How would you gain the required evidence to
    support one view or the other?

4
Debate 2 Infant Industry
  • Korea used both the Infant Industry technique and
    then followed it by an outward looking
    export-oriented strategy. Korea was successful
    because it could enjoy at first the gains from
    import protection before switching to an export
    strategy because it was a political ally of the
    west.
  • Jamaica, which followed a similar strategy,
    failed because they did not get favored treatment
    by developed countries since it had a socialist
    government.

5
Debate 2 Infant Industry
  • Which view do you agree with?
  • What are the essential ingredients in the infant
    industry argument to insure that gains are
    available in short-run ?
  • What policies must be in place to insure an
    export oriented policy both at home and in the
    developed countries ?

6
Industrialization as a Pathway
  • A. History
  • U.K. Industrialization lead to economic
    development
  • 1. But was this the entire story ?
  • No, Enclosures and Corn laws
  • 2. Industry was a leading sector
  • Textile exports, steel etc. and caused backward
    and forward linkages.

7
Modern Evidence
  • 1.Share of industrial value added in GNP to Yp
  • 2. Evidence for large countries 4x Yp raises
    industrial share by 20
  • 3. Only 1/2 of variation in valued added share of
    industry explained by level of Yp
  • 4. Variations around sc line explained y
  • i. Import substitution
  • ii. Resource endowment

8
Industrialization and Employment
  • 1. Elasticity value industry employment /
    industry value added .6
  • or a 10 increase in Yp leads to a 6 growth in
    employment.
  • 2. This implies that productivity rose by 4 per
    annum or
  • trade off between higher wages but less
    industrial employment

9
D. Industrial Structure
  • Backward Integration
  • rise in final or consumer demand feeds
  • back to producer goods.
  • Turning point is 2,500 in Yp
  • Forward Linkage
  • Textiles to cloth
  • .A necessary condition is that textiles must be
    produced below world cost
  • Policy to achieve above is infant industry
    tariff.

10
Investment Choices and Industry Choice of
Technique
  • 1. Context
  • Workers in rich country paid 10X that of poor
    country.
  • . Capital costs in poor country twice of rich
    country.
  • . Textile is of equal quality in both countries.
  • 2. Three Technologies
  • defined by capital-labour ratios
  • .T1 capital/labour ratio 80/223.6
  • . T218.1
  • .T3400/580
  • thus, T3 is 22 times more capital intensive than
    T1

11
Choice of Three Techniques
  • Tech 1 Tech 2 Tech 3
  • A. Inputs (M )
  • 1.Equip 80 200 400
  • 2.labour 22 11 5
  • 3. Other 11.4 9.3 6.7
  • Which technique to choose and why ?
  • What is the effect on employment ?

12
Factor costs Rich and Poor Countries
  • Rich Poor
  • 1. i rate .05 .10
  • 2. wages/yr 15 1.5

13
PV of Cost of T1-T3 Rich
  • (1,000) T1 T2
    T3
  • a. cap charge 80 200
    400
  • b. wages 4112 2056
    935
  • c. other costs 142 116
    83
  • d. Total Rich 4334 2372
    1418
  • T3 is the clear choice since it is relatively
    capital intensive or labour saving

14
PV of Cost of T1-T3 Poor
  • (1,000) T1 T2
    T3
  • a. cap charge 80 200 400
  • b. wages 280 140 64
  • c. other costs 97 79 57
  • d. Total Poor 457 419 521
  • Poor Pick T2 However, if wages drop than T1

15
LAC
16
What are Scale Economies
  • 1. What are scale economies?
  • a. Scale economies are declining Lac curves.
  • b. Declining LAC arise due to
  • a. fixed costs research,
  • b. spreading of capital,
  • c. greater scale implies greater specialization
  • d. quantity discounts
  • 2. What role do they play in an investment
    decision ?
  • Crucial to being competitive.

17
Second Criterion Product Choice?
  • Want to experience large scale economices quickly
    ? Why?
  • Small Domestic markets ?
  • Concepts MES
  • MES minimum efficient scale
  • increase in ac _at_1/2 MES
  • Tells you how steep your cost increase is on
    short run Average cost curve
  • MES as of market

18
Product Choices Why No Beer ?
  • rise in LAC
    MESas of market
  • 1. Bread 15
    1
  • 2. Beer 9
    3
  • 3. footwear 2
    .2
  • 4. dyes 22
    100
  • 5. sulfuric acid 1
    30
  • 6. polymers 5
    33
  • 7. cement 9
    10
  • 8. steel 8
    80
  • 9. machine tools 5
    100
  • 10. Electric motors 15
    60
  • 11. Autos 6
    50
  • 12. bicycles 1
    10
  • 13. diesel engines 4
    10

19
Conclusions
  • Beer and Bread No major scale economies and too
    quickly realized. Thus, all countries are
    efficient. Cant compete by scale
  • Steel and Machine tools,
  • Huge scale economies,
  • First there is efficient and tough for others to
    compete

20
Technical Choice and Scale
  • Favour Developed Countries
  • Capital Intensive have large scale economies and
    thus low capital costs keep developed countries
    continually out front when new techniques emerge
    for same products. Steel in Canada.

21
End of Show
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com