Title: Quasi-Experimental Designs 101: What Works?
1Quasi-Experimental Designs 101What Works?
- The Need To Know Team
- January 31 February 1, 2005
- Patricia J. Martens PhD
2Outline
- Reviewing Xs and Os
- Quasi-experimental time series designs with
comparison groups - The Population Health Research Data Repository
what data do we have? - Brainstorming ideas
3Key features of study designs
- Artificial manipulation?
- (experimental or observational)
- Experimental
- Are the groups randomly assigned to receive or
not receive the intervention? (randomized
controlled trial) - Are the groups selected to be as similar as
possible, not randomly? (quasi-experimental
comparison groups)
4Research Design Schema
5Key Features of Study Designs
- Observational
- Information collected concurrently or over a time
period? (cross-sectional or longitudinal) - If over a time period, i.e. longitudinal, do you
go from exposure to disease (cohort) or from
disease back in time to examine exposures
(case-control)? - Do you start now and go forward (prospective), or
do you have a cohort somewhere in the past and
you follow them forward (historical prospective)?
6Research Design Schema
7Study design observational
- Cross-sectional studies
- studying all factors at once - both the
hypothesized explanatory and outcome variables - Prospective studies
- going forward in time, following a cohort and
observing the effect of exposure to a future
outcome - Case-control studies
- going backwards in time from the cases/controls
to look at differential exposures
8Research Design Schema
9Study design What Works proposal
- Randomized Controlled (Clinical) Trial
- designing a specific intervention and randomly
assigning people to receive it or not to receive
it - Quasi-experimental
- using a comparison group which is not randomly
assigned - Each RHA is a comparison group
- A quasi-experimental time series with many
comparison groups (all other RHAs in the
province) - Diagrammed and described by Campbell Stanley
(1963)
10Lets play Xs and Os
- X is an intervention
- O is an outcome measure
- X O
-
11Lets play Xs and Os
12Lets play Xs and Os
13Lets play Xs and Os
- R means randomly assigned
- R O X O
- R O O
- (pretest-posttest control group design)
14Lets play Xs and Os
- _ _ _ _ means not randomly assigned
(quasi-experimental comparison) -
- O X O
- - - - - - - - -
- O O
15Lets play Xs and Os
- O X O
- - - - - - - - -
- O O
- quasi-experimental pretest- posttest design
- (non-randomized control group)
- (non-equivalent pretest-posttest comparison group
design)
16Examples of a quasi-experimental
pretest- posttest comparison group study to
determine effectiveness of hospital
policy/education program
17Lets play Xs and Os
- O O X O O
- Time series (quasi experiments)
18Example of a quasi-experimental time series to
determine effectiveness of a community-based
breastfeeding strategy
19Lets play Xs and Os
- Time series (quasi experiment with comparison
group) - O O X O O
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- O O O O
20Example of a quasi-experimental time series with
comparison groups to determine effectiveness of
a regional teen pregnancy reduction program
From CIHR proposal submission September 2004
21Additions of small amounts of phosphorus to one
section of ELA Lake 226 caused surface blooms of
blue-green algae, and vividly demonstrated the
importance of phosphate as a cause of excessive
algal growth or eutrophication. This experiment
spurred legislation controlling the input of
phosphorus to many water bodies.
A demonstration of the work of Dr. David
Schindler and the Experimental Lakes project in
NW Ontario
http//www.umanitoba.ca/institutes/fisheries/eutro
.html
22Study design Low internal validity
- Anecdote/case study
- Pre-experimental
- just doing a pretest and posttest on one group
and seeing its effect - Cross-sectional
- a snapshot in time cant tell which comes
first, but only that they are associated
23Study design medium internal validity
- Time series Time series with qualitative layer
- looking over time to see change, with information
about when interventions occurred in the time
frame - Case-control
- going backwards in time from the cases/controls
to look at different exposures to possible risk
factors - Observational (prospective)
- going forward in time, observing the effect of
exposure on a cohort to a future outcome
24Study design high internal validity
- Randomized Controlled (clinical) Trials, RCT
- designing a specific intervention and randomly
assigning people to receive it or not to receive
it - following people to observe the outcome of
interest - Quasi-experimental comparison group studies
- using a comparison group which is not randomly
assigned, but very similar at onset
25High
Randomized Controlled Trials RCT Quasi-experimenta
l comparison group studies
Time series with comparison Observational
(prospective) Case-control Time series with
qualitative layer
Internal validity
Cross-sectional Pre-experimental Anecdote/case
study
Low
26There is nothing so useless as doing
efficiently that which should not be done in the
first place.
27MCHPs paperclipsPopulation Health Research
Data Repository
Population-Based Health Registry
Census Data EA/DA level
National surveys
28Brainstorming What Works proposal
- Pick (a) a policy and (b) a program
- Think of something that your region has done in
the past, somewhere between 1997 and the present
(hopefully, with a few years of data AFTER the
onset of this) - What OUTCOME measures would you think this would
impact? - Think of what you would expect to see if this
intervention was working - Are there specific target groups to which this
intervention applies? (e.g. teens, people living
in a certain district of your region?) - What measures of this intervention would be
available through the Repository data? - Brainstorm and report! (see sheet for recording)
29Policy or Program Outcome Measure(s) Target Group Outcome available in Repository? Other comments
Teen pregnancy reduction Teen pregnancy rate 12-19 year olds? Certain district? pregnancies or live births? Maybe birth control pill use in Rx data?