Quasi-Experimental Designs 101: What Works? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Quasi-Experimental Designs 101: What Works?

Description:

Quasi-Experimental Designs 101: What Works? The Need To Know Team January 31 February 1, 2005 Patricia J. Martens PhD – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:297
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: MCHPE3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quasi-Experimental Designs 101: What Works?


1
Quasi-Experimental Designs 101What Works?
  • The Need To Know Team
  • January 31 February 1, 2005
  • Patricia J. Martens PhD

2
Outline
  • Reviewing Xs and Os
  • Quasi-experimental time series designs with
    comparison groups
  • The Population Health Research Data Repository
    what data do we have?
  • Brainstorming ideas

3
Key features of study designs
  • Artificial manipulation?
  • (experimental or observational)
  • Experimental
  • Are the groups randomly assigned to receive or
    not receive the intervention? (randomized
    controlled trial)
  • Are the groups selected to be as similar as
    possible, not randomly? (quasi-experimental
    comparison groups)

4
Research Design Schema
5
Key Features of Study Designs
  • Observational
  • Information collected concurrently or over a time
    period? (cross-sectional or longitudinal)
  • If over a time period, i.e. longitudinal, do you
    go from exposure to disease (cohort) or from
    disease back in time to examine exposures
    (case-control)?
  • Do you start now and go forward (prospective), or
    do you have a cohort somewhere in the past and
    you follow them forward (historical prospective)?

6
Research Design Schema
7
Study design observational
  • Cross-sectional studies
  • studying all factors at once - both the
    hypothesized explanatory and outcome variables
  • Prospective studies
  • going forward in time, following a cohort and
    observing the effect of exposure to a future
    outcome
  • Case-control studies
  • going backwards in time from the cases/controls
    to look at differential exposures

8
Research Design Schema
9
Study design What Works proposal
  • Randomized Controlled (Clinical) Trial
  • designing a specific intervention and randomly
    assigning people to receive it or not to receive
    it
  • Quasi-experimental
  • using a comparison group which is not randomly
    assigned
  • Each RHA is a comparison group
  • A quasi-experimental time series with many
    comparison groups (all other RHAs in the
    province)
  • Diagrammed and described by Campbell Stanley
    (1963)

10
Lets play Xs and Os
  • X is an intervention
  • O is an outcome measure
  • X O

11
Lets play Xs and Os
  • O X O

12
Lets play Xs and Os
  • O X O
  • O O

13
Lets play Xs and Os
  • R means randomly assigned
  • R O X O
  • R O O
  • (pretest-posttest control group design)

14
Lets play Xs and Os
  • _ _ _ _ means not randomly assigned
    (quasi-experimental comparison)
  • O X O
  • - - - - - - - -
  • O O

15
Lets play Xs and Os
  • O X O
  • - - - - - - - -
  • O O
  • quasi-experimental pretest- posttest design
  • (non-randomized control group)
  • (non-equivalent pretest-posttest comparison group
    design)

16
Examples of a quasi-experimental
pretest- posttest comparison group study to
determine effectiveness of hospital
policy/education program
17
Lets play Xs and Os
  • O O X O O
  • Time series (quasi experiments)

18
Example of a quasi-experimental time series to
determine effectiveness of a community-based
breastfeeding strategy
19
Lets play Xs and Os
  • Time series (quasi experiment with comparison
    group)
  • O O X O O
  • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  • O O O O

20
Example of a quasi-experimental time series with
comparison groups to determine effectiveness of
a regional teen pregnancy reduction program
From CIHR proposal submission September 2004
21
Additions of small amounts of phosphorus to one
section of ELA Lake 226 caused surface blooms of
blue-green algae, and vividly demonstrated the
importance of phosphate as a cause of excessive
algal growth or eutrophication. This experiment
spurred legislation controlling the input of
phosphorus to many water bodies.
A demonstration of the work of Dr. David
Schindler and the Experimental Lakes project in
NW Ontario
http//www.umanitoba.ca/institutes/fisheries/eutro
.html
22
Study design Low internal validity
  • Anecdote/case study
  • Pre-experimental
  • just doing a pretest and posttest on one group
    and seeing its effect
  • Cross-sectional
  • a snapshot in time cant tell which comes
    first, but only that they are associated

23
Study design medium internal validity
  • Time series Time series with qualitative layer
  • looking over time to see change, with information
    about when interventions occurred in the time
    frame
  • Case-control
  • going backwards in time from the cases/controls
    to look at different exposures to possible risk
    factors
  • Observational (prospective)
  • going forward in time, observing the effect of
    exposure on a cohort to a future outcome

24
Study design high internal validity
  • Randomized Controlled (clinical) Trials, RCT
  • designing a specific intervention and randomly
    assigning people to receive it or not to receive
    it
  • following people to observe the outcome of
    interest
  • Quasi-experimental comparison group studies
  • using a comparison group which is not randomly
    assigned, but very similar at onset

25
High
Randomized Controlled Trials RCT Quasi-experimenta
l comparison group studies
Time series with comparison Observational
(prospective) Case-control Time series with
qualitative layer
Internal validity
Cross-sectional Pre-experimental Anecdote/case
study
Low
26
There is nothing so useless as doing
efficiently that which should not be done in the
first place.
  • Peter Drucker

27
MCHPs paperclipsPopulation Health Research
Data Repository
Population-Based Health Registry
Census Data EA/DA level
National surveys
28
Brainstorming What Works proposal
  • Pick (a) a policy and (b) a program
  • Think of something that your region has done in
    the past, somewhere between 1997 and the present
    (hopefully, with a few years of data AFTER the
    onset of this)
  • What OUTCOME measures would you think this would
    impact?
  • Think of what you would expect to see if this
    intervention was working
  • Are there specific target groups to which this
    intervention applies? (e.g. teens, people living
    in a certain district of your region?)
  • What measures of this intervention would be
    available through the Repository data?
  • Brainstorm and report! (see sheet for recording)

29
Policy or Program Outcome Measure(s) Target Group Outcome available in Repository? Other comments
Teen pregnancy reduction Teen pregnancy rate 12-19 year olds? Certain district? pregnancies or live births? Maybe birth control pill use in Rx data?

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com